AWAY rolling bag

The smaller bag is 38 liters. That’s way more than enough for any trip.

Decisions, decisions: I'm curious to see it, but as soon as I Google it, then I'll probably also see it advertised constantly, by web advertising services. Also, if one were only carrying "a red bikini, a cap and one shoe," would one really need wheels?

I didn't purchase it, but did seriously consider it. The size is great in my opinion. It is the same capacity as my Osprey backpack, 38L, and it is sized to fit international carryon requirements. It was out of my budget though, so I went with a different brand. I also didn't feel the need for a suitcase with a battery. While convenient, I think that is just extra fluff, especially since it would have to be removed if the bag was ever checked. I do know someone who has it though, and is happy with it.

And remember, some airline are banning these bags if the batteries inside are not removed.

The bag is the new thing with the travel journalistas. They just love it. However, reviewers not swayed by its "hipness" have said it doesn't feel that sturdy and the telescoping handle seems a bit loose. I have never tried the bag myself so I can't verify the above.

I am about to try mine out, the carry on size in pretty dark blue, for a brief domestic trip before my 3 week Scandinavian trip this summer. The charger in the new models pops right out from under the handle. (I will likely not ever use it, since it just adds weight and is the same size as the external one I typically take.) After my old Lipault carry on bag was drenched when a domestic flight required gate checking, I shopped for a replacement with hard sides. This is very lightweight, almost "cheap" feeling plastic for the shell, but it is supposed to be really durable. What I do love already is the ingenious inner design, with one side for shoes, etc and the other for clothes. You do have to totally unzip it and open flat for access. The hidden laundry bag is nifty, too. It is supposed to meet the newer international carry on requirements. I get what reviews say about the handle. The wheels seem sturdy and speedy. Hopefully I will look cool and nobody will know I have sweats and not a tiny red bikini inside🤣!

Can I swap out the red for yellow polka dot?

Well, though I expect it would pass, the 21.7" actually doesn't comply with AirCanada's limitations of 21.5". If there is any creative measuring going on (not including the wheels for example), then it won't fit "international" standards. There are also plenty of cheapo airlines with even smaller limitations.
That being said, I like the interior design despite not being a hard side luggage fan, and find jyself partial to the imprsctical pink. My bikini would of course match my luggage.

Maria....when countries that use metric switch to U.S. measurements they always round to the nearest .5

Air Canada's hand baggage limits are 55 x 40 x 23 cm. That's 21.65 inches. Do you really think the sizers are so precise to measure 0.05 inches which is 0.13cm?

The Away luggage was designed to pass the european limits of 55 x 35 x 23 cm.

I had to laugh when I got a post card from AWAY. It said, "This is luggage for the way you actually travel". Excuse me, the way I actually travel is not with a 7 lb, rigid, spinner. And I don't need no stinkin' built in battery.

when countries that use metric switch to U.S. measurements they always round to the nearest .5

In which case 55 cm is 21.5 inches.

Yes, Lee, you've let out the big secret. There are actually two different sizers--one for people using metric and one for Americans. The ones for Americans are kept hidden and only brought out when they see people carrying the blue and gold guidebook. Afterall, that 0.15 inches gets them every time.

Non-U.S. airlines must be making a fortune on unknowning Americans. If only we used metric.

I actually was going to post a question but I see there is already a discussion going on. I am planning on buying a new bag for a trip to Italy this summer to Naples, Amalfi Coast and Rome, and am trying to make up my mind between a soft sided convertible bag that has wheels and can be carried like a backpack, either the Eagle Creek Expanse 21" Convertible Carryon, which is only 30 liters, or the Away bag, which, though I've never used a hard sided back, I really like the look of. I may also consider getting the Eagle Creek Load Warrior 22", which has wheels but not a backpack, but it's pretty light and has lots of handles. I like the idea of the Expanse Convertible and having the option of wheeling it or carrying it on my back, but am leery about the size, as I plan on only using the carryon, and am not sure whether I really need the backpack option. I've thought about getting the Expanse and the Away and trying them out at home and then sending one back, and I may yet do that. In the meantime I appreciate any suggestions!

Just bought the small Away and it came today. I practiced packing with a RS compression bag Large, put 4 or 5 pairs of pants in it, including jeans, a fleece sweatshirt, 2 skorts, several t-shirts, a pile of underwear, a nightgown and maybe a couple other things, compressed it, and that fit in the one side with room to spare. On the other side I had three pairs of shoes, sandals, make-up bag and some miscellaneous stuff...room to spare. Weight loaded like that was 18 pounds. Plenty of room for a week of clothing. The bag has a 100 day tryout, which for me will include a three day in-state trip and a 2 week Italy trip. I should then know. The handle has some play for shock absorption, they say. The sides flex but are supposedly unbreakable. Lifetime warranty. Pretty much risk free, if you ask me. Measurements are within BA's guidelines including wheels/handle.

Vicki - You didn't use packing cubes?