Please sign in to post.

base for Utrecht, Den Bosch, The Hague, Leiden, Haarlem

The Netherlands has so much to see and experience, I must return! Luckily, I have 2 weeks.
I enjoy architecture, art, food and learning about the area.
I'll begin in Amsterdam, then go west to visit Palais Het Lo.

After that...I need a convenient base or two for day-trips by train before heading back to Schiphol Airport.
With the remaining 5 nights, this is my unfiltered wish list:
Utrecht, The Hague, Den Bosch, Haarlem, Leiden
How is Geithoorn in the late fall?

Options:
Add Leiden to my time in Amsterdam.
Use Utrecht as a base to see it and the Hague, Den Bosch
Use Haarlem as a base to see it and head to Schiphol for my flight.

I'm open to your ideas & suggestions. I keep reading about castles with moats. It seems like you could enjoy the country for months and not get bored!

Thanks for any suggestions (hotels included) or ideas.
Lee

Posted by
12894 posts

Well if you want to see all of the ones you listed, and it’s a little unclear whether you do, I wouldn’t pick Utrecht as a base. As a destination, it works though, as you could easily get there from Amsterdam, Leiden or even The Hague without too much trouble.

But if it was me, I would go with Leiden just because I love Leiden and I think it would be wonderful to stay there. It’s much more residential than the other places around Amsterdam, is is very charming with a wonderful atmosphere, and it’s easy to get to and from by train.

Posted by
2313 posts

Given its central location, Utrecht is a good bases to visit all the places you mention, including Paleis Het Loo.

I’m however a bit confused by your itinerary;
“ I'll begin in Amsterdam, then go west to visit Palais Het Lo.
After that...I need a convenient base or two for day-trips by train before heading back to Schiphol Airport.
With the remaining 5 nights, this is my unfiltered wish list:
Utrecht, The Hague, Den Bosch, Haarlem, Leiden”

What day trips do you want to make from the “convenient base or two”? And do then after that need a new base to see Utrecht, The Hague, Den Bosch and Leiden? I guess what confuses me is the phrase “remaining 5 nights”.
Can you please clarify your planned itinerary a bit more? It would also help to know what time of year you plan to be here.

Posted by
2426 posts

There are still many castles with a moat in the Netherlands. Here an overview per province:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_castles_in_the_Netherlands

The most famous are Muiderslot near Amsterdam and Loevestein near Gorinchem south of Utrecht. For the latter you have to take the foot ferry from Gorinchem to very charming Woudrichem with an additional ferry to the castle. Lovely places and setting, to my opinion good for a daytrip you are looking for.

https://muiderslot.nl/en/
https://www.slotloevestein.nl/en/

De Haar Castle west of Utrecht is open to public too, despite being a 19th century rebuilt worth a visit.

https://www.kasteeldehaar.nl/en/

Posted by
1500 posts

It was my second time visiting the Netherlands that I stayed in Utrecht. From there I made a return visit for the day to Amsterdam, then a day trip to Den Haag, and then headed for Schipol from there as well.

Posted by
9543 posts

I will disagree a bit with others, but Leiden would fit the bill as a base for all that you want to do. It is the most central to most of your wish list, only 15 to 20 minutes to Schiphol by direct train (better than Haarlem by train or bus), about a half hour into Amsterdam, a bit less to Haarlem, 15 minutes to The Hague, a few minutes more to Delft, 45 minutes to Utrecht, with Den Bosch the only outlier, but only 90 minutes away.

Posted by
2426 posts

For visiting Palace ( Paleis in Dutch) Het Loo adjacent to Apeldoorn you can stay for instance in one of the charming Hanseatic cities like Deventer, Zutphen, Zwolle and Kampen along the IJssel river. Apeldoorn is 10 minutes by train from Deventer, Zutphen needs almost the same time.

For planning train journeys: https://www.ns.nl/en/journeyplanner/#/

Giethoorn takes for instance around 1h 40min with train and bus from Deventer. For planning public transport in general: https://9292.nl/en/

Posted by
2000 posts

Visit Haarlem from Amsterdam.

Utrecht, Leiden or Delft would work for me as the second location.

Posted by
174 posts

Thanks to you all for the suggestions and questions. Early planning is never clear, so apologies for the lack of clarity.

One week is in Amsterdam, that is all set for the late fall. Leiden or Geithoorn will be a daytrip from Amsterdam.
The remaining week will be split between Utrecht and Haarlem, to enjoy them and the surroundings by train.

Hotel or restaurant suggestions for Utrecht and Haarlem would be welcome.

Thanks,
Lee

Posted by
2676 posts

I stayed in both Utrecht and Haarlem in spring 2026. I will just say that you should be aware that Utrecht's train station is hidden behind a huge shopping mall that you have to go through or around. I would not choose Utrecht as a base from which to take many day trips because of the extra time needed to get to the trains.

Posted by
129 posts

We stayed in Utrecht in 2023 and loved it! We arrived in Utrecht at the enormous main station, Utrecht Centraal, but for day trips we used Utrecht Vaartsche Rijn train station, which is a much smaller station and it was very convenient for us. From Utrecht Vaartsche Rijn station, we trained to visit Castle de Haar, Leiden, and Amersfoort., and we stayed at Hotel Museumkwartier, and our room overlooked a canal which made for fun people watching.

Posted by
7272 posts

Janet, I share your sentiments. Tracking thru that huge shopping center was a real turn off. I didn't really get the feel of Utrecht, maybe because that was not an ideal start.

Posted by
4553 posts

I will just say that you should be aware that Utrecht's train station
is hidden behind a huge shopping mall that you have to go through or
around.

Maybe it depends on which door you use. I did a day trip there in 2023 and was not bothered by the short walk through the station/mall.

Posted by
7272 posts

Carrie, once again , you are the pro! When the RS Guide complained about the monster shopping center, and didn't specify a shortcut, I never looked for one.

Posted by
2313 posts

There is no short cut. In order to get from the train station into the historical city center of Utrecht, the shortest way is thru the shopping mall. There is a way around it, but it’s not shorter and there is currently a lot of construction going on in that area.
Based on her use of the words “ the short walk through the station/mall”, my guess is that Carrie is talking about the actual train station, which has lots of shops and food outlets. Whereas others are talking about Hoog Catherijne, the huge shopping mall located between the train station and the historical part of the city.

Posted by
4553 posts

Well, wherever I walked, I wasn’t bothered by it. :-)

I would not consider it a deterrent for visiting Utrecht.

Posted by
2313 posts

I also don’t see why the shopping mall seems to put off so many people in this thread.
Due to its location Utrecht is the ideal train hub from which to explore our country. In addition to that, Utrecht is a beautiful historical city. It has canals, nice squares, interesting museums, great restaurants and cafes etc etc.

Posted by
12894 posts

I found out a few months ago that some of my ancestors on my mother's side came from Utrecht, which gives me a lot of motivation for heading back to the Netherlands and visiting Utrecht.

Dutch_Traveler, I have a question for you. On my daughter's and my recent trip to Iceland, Stockholm and Norway, we ran into four different groups (two families, one couple and one solo traveler) from the Netherlands on various occasions and struck up conversations with all of them. Both families were from Haarlem, the woman from Amsterdam, and the couple from a town near Rotterdam.

We really enjoyed talking to them, but in every case, when I asked them where they were from, they said "Holland," not "the Netherlands." I assumed that everyone refers to their country as the Netherlands, not Holland. I do know that there is a geographical distinction in that here are areas of the Netherlands that are not in Holland. So is that why people say they're from Holland? Is this typical of everyone?

Posted by
2313 posts

That’s an interesting question, Mardee.
It is one of my pet peeves that RS refers to my country as Holland. Holland is only a small part of the country, albeit the part in which almost half of the population lives. The European part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands consists of 12 provinces. 2 of these provinces are called Noord-Holland and Zuid-Holland ( North- and South-Holland)
Haarlem and Amsterdam are in the province of North-Holland, Rotterdam is in South-Holland. So it makes sense that the Dutch people you met would say they’re from Holland, because they actually are :-)
I can guarantee you though that if you had met a family from Heerenveen or from Maastricht, they would have told you that they came from the Netherlands. Or they would have even told you that they came from Friesland or Limburg respectively. The Frisians and the Limburgers are famously (notoriously?) very proud of their heritage. The Frisian language for instance, is an official language in our country. It’s not a dialect, it’s a separate language with it’s own spelling, grammar and vocabulary. If a Frisian has to appear in court, he/she has the right to speak Frisian and to have a translator present to translate to and from Dutch, should any of the members of the court cannot speak Frisian.
And don’t get me started on the Limburgers…. ;-)

So long story short; my countrymen and -women who live in North or South Holland, might say there from Holland. Those that live in the rest of the country, will usually say they’re from the Netherlands.

Posted by
12894 posts

Thanks for the response! That makes a lot of sense. They were all very fun, especially the Dutch family that we took the RIB boat out to the glacier with. They made me laugh so hard, and we were just choking around the whole trip. And the woman from Amsterdam was interesting. She had driven to Norway from where she lives (I guess her home is on the outskirts of the city) and brought a tent with her and was camping out the whole trip. But all of them were a lot of fun and we really enjoyed talking to them.

Honestly, sometimes I think that's one of the best things about travel. Meeting people from other countries and just engaging in conversation and having a good time.

Posted by
237 posts

Fun fact: Haarlem is the capital of the province of North Holland, not our nation’s capital Amsterdam which is also in North Holland.

Posted by
2 posts

The Frisians and the Limburgers are famously (notoriously?) very proud
of their heritage. The Frisian language for instance, is an official
language in our country. It’s not a dialect, it’s a separate language
with it’s own spelling, grammar and vocabulary.

@Dutch_Traveler...that is quite interesting and The Frisians may be misrepresented in regard to the use of their language. Eight years ago, my husband and I spent several wonderful nights in the quaint village of Ortisei (Italian name, Urtijëi in Ladin). It is one of the three villages located in Val Gardena within South Tyrol, Italy in the Dolomites. This area was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, but was lost to Italy following WWI.

If one walked into the village without knowing where it was located, Italy would never be the guess as to one's whereabouts. A more likely guess would be the Bavarian Alps. The children of the area learn three official languages, German, Italian and Ladin with the option to also learn English in support of tourism. South Tyrol is trying to keep the Ladin language alive via the education of young students to prevent it from dying out. In almost all of the municipalities in this area, over 80% of the population speak Ladin.