Please sign in to post.

Why does Rick promote the myth that camping and cooking gear are related?

Rick is surely not the only one who promotes the myth, but I have seen him promote it enough to make me want to scream, even though from other comments it is pretty obvious he knows it is a myth.

Rick has stated that if you go the camping route you need to bring a tent, sleeping bag and cooking gear. Implying that if you don’t go the camping route there is no need to bring the cooking gear. Both of these statements are total baloney.

First, I have gone camping, once as long as two weeks, without bringing any cooking gear whatsoever. Some meals were cold (e.g. cold cut sandwiches) but most were at a restaurant. Granted this route won’t work if you are doing backcountry wilderness camping. But it works just fine if every day you are leaving the campground and heading off somewhere touristy. First stop is somewhere for breakfast.

Second, just because you are not camping doesn’t mean cooking gear is coming with you. In fact Rick sells overpriced plastic forks and spoons on his website and encourages picnic lunches. I have done a week of traveling all in hotels and motels and only had one or two restaurant meals during the entire course of the week. But, most times I was packing a pot, cup, bowl, frying pan, fork, spoon, knife, hot plate and can opener. You can cook a lot with just one burner if you plan it right. When I needed to travel a little lighter the frying pan and hot plate got left at home and all I had was an immersion heater. Works great for boiling water but not much else.

It is true some people who camp do a lot of cooking. By camping and cooking you can travel very cheap. And there are many people who do hotels and all restaurant meals. My budget tends to allow one or the other. If I go camping and pay very little for lodging, I have enough money to splurge at restaurants (even very expensive ones), but if I am paying for hotels, I need to be much more careful with my food budget.

Posted by
2788 posts

Having met RS some 20 years ago at lectures and travel shows, I have never heard that "myth" before. I guess I am real glad that I missed it.

Posted by
10235 posts

I don't know where this is coming from, and never heard this myth, but I will agree that you don't have to cook in order to camp. My brother spent 4 months in Europe doing a combination of camping, staying with relatives and hostels. He didn't take anything to cook with. He ate his meals at restaurants or purchased food at a grocery store. As the OP said, this doesn't work for wilderness camping.

Posted by
1035 posts

First Iran and now this cooking gear controversy. Rick will soon be the Mel Gibson of travel writers.

Posted by
8947 posts

I guess this won't be a contender for "Helpline Question of the Month"

Posted by
1317 posts

LOL @ Jo's comment.

I too don't really recall Rick talking too much about camping and cooking, as his target audience tends to be those middle ground folks who don't want 5-star luxury or to sleep on the ground.

To give you an actual answer to the title of thread, I suspect it's because most people who plan to go camping, particularly in Europe, are doing so to save money and travel as absolutely cheap as possible. Restaurants are not all that cheap, ergo, cooking one's own food is recommended. It's also often recommended as a cost-cutting measure for those who rent apartments instead of pitching tents.

The no camping = no cooking implication is a fallacy. The one statement does not logically derive from the other. However, in most apartments, cooking implements are provided, and in most hotels there is limited space/ability to cook.

Sure there are exceptions to every scenario, but as a guidebook author, Rick is trying to cover as broad an audience as possible by talking in generalities.

Posted by
873 posts

You're really going to go to Europe "packing a pot, cup, bowl, frying pan, fork, spoon, knife, hot plate and can opener"? I might not have been around as long as most of the posters here, but when did Rick encourage that at all?

Posted by
683 posts

As a columnist once said on TV, after being asked her take on a speech, "It probably sounded better in the original German"

Posted by
12040 posts

As far as I can remember, I think he mentions the usefulness of packing a Swiss Army knife and corkscrew, but that's about it.

And yes, this is a very strange thread...

Posted by
75 posts

This may be the strangest post I have read in a LONG time. Just what are they putting into the water in Albany?

Posted by
811 posts

Between this and being asked to forecast the Pope's demise, there has been a lot of levity on the HelpLine this week.

Posted by
9100 posts

Here's another myth I wish RS would stop promoting! Buying the largest size of an item at the supermarket is always cheaper; not true! I was at the supermarket today and noticed it was cheaper to purchase two 32oz containers of Gatorade, instead of the big half gallon size. Also cheaper to purchase a 64oz size of Tropicana OJ, compared to the big plastic jugs. Had I taken your advice Rick, I would be out $2.43! I could have purchased two of your European Electrical Adapters! Please stick to what you know best Rick: travel and marijuana reform!

Posted by
811 posts

That was a very wise decision to go with the 2-32 oz bottles, Michael. Unless, of course, you opted for the smaller sizes so you could sip on them whilst walking the streets of New Paltz because then we'd have a serious problem...

;)

Posted by
2193 posts

Michael makes a good point…it often makes much more sense to buy a nickel bag instead of a larger dime bag.

Posted by
365 posts

You will always find excellent Gatorade values in Wales.

Posted by
4407 posts

But RS doesn't sell a specific 'for Wales' plug adapter; how will I ever get my hot plate to work? I don't want to be overcharged at some tourist restaurant for their Gatorade reduction salmon sauce when I could make the same thing in my room (or train).

Hey - What happened to the very recent post about cooking on trains (and other 'things'...)?!?

<;^D