Please sign in to post.

Want to play travel agent - Scandinavia?

[Cross-posted from Sweden board to get general replies]

I'm trying to put together a trip to Scandinavia in the near future. The cities I'm targeting are Copenhagen, Stockholm, and Oslo - after probably flying into Amsterdam. Trip will probably be 16-17 nights and most likely traveling solo so can be a pretty agile traveler. I've been to Europe 4 times and really did not dislike any city - but really like Amsterdam, Berlin, and Paris. I love museums, walking tours, history, food - not too interested in things like hiking, biking, but not out of the question for an awesome opportunity.

Just trying to figure out things like:

How to balance time in each city - equal in each?
Best travel options between cities - plane vs train.
Is one city best for departure back to USA?
How good of an option is AirBnB in these areas vs hotel?

Just trying to get general feel now.

Thanks

Posted by
25 posts

Hi,

We just took a similar trip last summer. We flew to Stockholm where we stayed 3 nights, saw the major sights in the city, and could have stayed 1-2 more to see some of the archipelago/surrounds. We then took the fast train to Copenhagen (5 hours--booked a few months before online) and stayed 4 nights with family friends in a suburb, but visited Copenhagen, Roskilde (Viking Museum/town). I would say 2 full days in Copenhagen would give you a good feeling for the city. We then flew to Bergen, Norway (from CPH) and stayed 2 nights there--well worth the trip and plenty to see in 1-2 days. From Bergen we took a train to the fjords--stayed in Aurland in a fjord-side cabin 1 night (could have stayed another if an outdoor adventure was desired), and then traveled the Flam Railway, ending eventually in Oslo where we easily could have spent 3 days. The train ride from Myrdal to Oslo was one of the most amazing journeys I have ever taken in all of Europe.

We found wonderful museums in both Oslo and Stockholm (get the Stockholm pass), and found rail travel very easy in all 3 countries (easy to book all train travel from the US several months before). We, too, have traveled extensively in Europe and found the only drawback to travel in this region was the very high prices everywhere (including grocery stores). The natural beauty of Norway is breathtaking and experiencing the progressive societies of all three countries was very refreshing. Enjoy your trip!

Posted by
8176 posts

We have been to Copenhagen and would advise minimum of 4 days for tour the city and surrounding area.

Haven't been to Oslo or Stockholm, but I am planning a trip for June 2019 for Stockholm and possibly Oslo prior to our Arctic Circle cruise up the coast of Norway. From what I have read, you will need about 4 days for each city. The train is good from Copenhagen to Stockholm, but there is a ferry you might consider between Oslo and Copenhagen.

Check your flights, but I would probably plan on flying back from Copenhagen.

Posted by
99 posts

Just love Amsterdam mainly and want to stay there a couple nights

Posted by
3 posts

You may have already considered this before, but Norway is really for nature, not for urban exploring. Bergen is pretty if you absolutely must see a Norwegian city though. Oslo is almost universally considered the ugliest of the Nordic capitals.

Are you wanting to explore smaller cities or small towns in Scandinavia? If so, how many?

Posted by
99 posts

maybe smaller towns in a day trip, but probably not wanting a lot of hopping around as far as packing/unpacking

I'm starting to lean Iceland-Amsterdam-Copenhagen-Stockholm a little

Posted by
3 posts

Copenhagen has some decent day trips-- There's the Louisiana Museum in Humlebaek, and the unmissable Frederiksborg Castle (Danish castle exteriors are right up there with Germany and England's castles in my opinion, and they have pretty classy interiors too with lots of black and white checkered floors). Osterlen in Skane is a quaint sort of Midwestern farm-type region east across the bridge into Sweden that never gets mentioned in guidebooks for some reason, in fact its hard to find information on it in English.

Uppsala is probably the best place to focus on outside of Stockholm, there's tons to do. Outside of Stockholm for the most part, Swedish architecture can start to look bland, especially with the lack of mountains in 80% of the country. I'd say the only really aesthetic cities in Sweden are Stockholm, Uppsala, Lund, Vaxjo, Linkoping, Lulea and Umea.

Posted by
12313 posts

I felt there was more to see and do in Copenhagen. I spent six nights there and could have spent more. I flew in and out of Copenhagen because I could get a direct flight to DC (near my home). Stay near Kongen's Nytorv (upper end of the pedestrian mall). It's a nicer area and faster/easier to get to by metro from the airport than center city is using the train. I like the Copenhagen card because it covers the city, all transportation, plus transportation and sights all over northern Zealand.

Oslo is fairly small so spend less time there or add the Norway in a Nutshell tour (see Rick's guides).

Plan to fly from city to city, there is no other really good option. You can ferry overnight but it's more expensive than flying. I'd add a ferry from either Stockholm to Helsinki, Tallinn or a triangle of all three. The archipelago out of Stockholm is beautiful and you will only see it by water.

I like Airbnb in Europe. I generally price things out each trip before deciding. Remember, unless a hotel says breakfast included, it probably comes at an added charge.

Posted by
99 posts

I'd add a ferry from either Stockholm to Helsinki, Tallinn or a triangle of all three.

So are you suggesting ferrying to say Tallinn and staying there - or could that be a day trip from Stockolm? How long does a ferry take I guess is the question.