I read this and it was interesting: https://www.theplanetedit.com/travel-boycotts-ethics/ and the subject was touched on a tiny bit in another thread, so I thought I would toss it out.
There is a lot of grey area in this. If you choose to boycott, where do you draw the line? Even the most benign trip might have implications:
Human rights abuses in France: https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/europe-and-central-asia/france/report-france/
Human rights abuses in Italy: https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/europe-and-central-asia/italy/report-italy/
I tend to separate people from government. My requirements are I will consider going if:
1. If the general culture, or maybe a large segment of the culture, appears include people that would be interesting to share ideas with.
2. If I am fairly confident the money I spend will do more good than harm.
3. If my being there doesn't present an impression that I approve of a current negative world affair that the country may be involved in
4. If my security is fairly well assured.
I didn't mention any locations as this is more about the process than your decision. No, right, no wrong. Just thought provoking.