Please sign in to post.

Short flight connection for return flight to USA: 85 minutes in CDG or 100 minutes in AMS?

I am planning a trip, flying from USA to Italy. On the return flight back to the USA, I can connect through either CDG (Air France, with a 1 hr 25 min connection) or AMS (KLM, with a 1 hr 40 min connection).

I read a bunch of posts here about short connections at each airport, and it seems both of these are possible - although tight, especially if there are lines at passport control or the flight is delayed. But I haven't read anything comparing the two of them against each other. I am inclined to book the KLM flight, as the things I've read suggest this is a slightly easier airport to navigate and it gives me an extra 15 minutes. Is that correct, for anyone who has experience with both? Which would you choose?

At CDG, I would come into 2F and depart 2E (using the gate assignments from today's flights)
At AMS, I would come into B and depart from E.

I could get a longer connection, but I would have to depart Italy at 6am and that will be miserable.

I am an experienced traveler and my home airport is huge, so I am very comfortable navigating big airports, fwiw.

Posted by
23214 posts

I can't speak for CDG, but AMS is pretty good. You can move up in the passport line if your connecting flight is imminant.

Posted by
1275 posts

While there is no way to predict exactly what the conditions will be on your date of travel,
on average, Amsterdam will be the better airport to connect in.

CDG is large and potentially confusing. AMS is not small, but less confusing.

As long as your flights are booked on the same ticket, KLM will make sure you get home.

Posted by
4 posts

OK thank you both. You confirmed my suspicions. I'll book through AMS. I appreciate the quick responses.

Posted by
188 posts

I had a similar dilemma and opted for AMS for my trip later this summer.

I was at CDG last year and it was tight for my connection there even though just under 2 hours (arriving from USA heading to Morocco).

You will be coming from within EU so I expect either connection to be easier/faster.

Posted by
9895 posts

We have used both airports for flights.

I would give the edge to AMS over CDG. At CDG you have farther to walk between the two terminals.

Posted by
9287 posts

I too would opt for Amsterdam, mainly because of the ease of the airport, but personally, if I was going to be stuck someplace, the Amsterdam area is much easier to get around and much more pleasant than Paris.

Posted by
2000 posts

I too would choose Amsterdam. I've had a 90 minute connection at CDG when returning to the US. I was told to run. I thought the agent was joking. I didn't run but walked very quickly. The door closed within a couple of minutes of my boarding. Folks who I knew were also on that flight didn't make it. And I've missed a connection to the US at Amsterdam when my inbound flight was significantly delayed. The airport hotel Delta/KLM (don't remember which, it was a codeshare) put me up in was very nice. Swimming pool, good restaurant and if I had the energy, easy access to the City Center.

Posted by
2313 posts

Just a reminder that, if you're delayed on a flight returning to the US from the EU on a single ticket, the airline will owe you a substantial amount of reimbursement. That fact (and that I've been retired) means I don't sweat the connection times so much.

Posted by
1275 posts

jphbucks is partially correct. If the delay is due to an airline issue and not an Act of God
(e.g., weather, war, etc), then the EC261 provisions kick in and compensation is due based
on the amount of delay and the distance traveled. It's not the easiest thing to figure out,
and some airlines will drag their feet to the greatest extent possible before offering a
resolution.

Also, in the event of a delay for any reason, the airline is required to offer "Care of Duty"
which means meals and a hotel room overnight if that is the extent of the delay.

Posted by
83 posts

Is it my imagination or are airlines scheduling more flights with less time for connections? We don't see as many 2+ hour layovers as we used to.

Posted by
7862 posts

It's a normal connection in AMS (I've done as little as 1 hr.), it's a tight one in CDG!