Please sign in to post.

No Wonder the Lines are So Long Everywhere! Some Interesting Passport Data

I've often wondered why the lines had become so long at the major tourist sites. This is pretty much from the time I started traveling in Europe. The previous 20 years 1974 - 1995 the number of passports issued went from 2.4 million to 5.2 million. My guess is a good portion of those were for business travel.

EDIT: My guess is this is the same trend in many countries around the world - I just happened to be looking at US data.

U.S. Passports Issued per Fiscal Year (1996 - 2015)

Fiscal Year U.S. Passports Issued

2015 15,556,216 (includes 1,647,413 passport cards)

2014 14,087,341 (includes 1,463,191 passport cards)

2013 13,529,757 (includes 1,408,865 passport cards)

2012 13,125,829 (includes 1,300,145 passport cards)

2011 12,613,153 (includes 1,173,092 passport cards)

2010 14,794,604 (includes 1,556,392 passport cards)

2009 14,170,171 (includes 1,544,718 passport cards)

2008 16,132,536 (includes 189,560 passport cards)

2007 18,382,798

2006 12,133,537

2005 10,123,424

2004 8,825,410

2003 7,300,667

2002 7,001,482

2001 7,119,506

2000 7,292,182

1999 6,722,198

1998 6,539,864

1997 6,295,003

1996 5,547,693

Posted by
32932 posts

You are forgetting that travelers from the rest of the world also make up substantial parts of those lines.

There are parts of the world sending huge numbers of travelers now that didn't in the past, China and India being just two.

Posted by
2393 posts

Very true Nigel - I am guessing many countries travel growth is similar or greater than the US - especially China & India to a lesser degree.

I think for the US and other countries it clearly demonstrates the affluence of the baby boomers.

Posted by
2642 posts

I think Keith hits the nail on the head. I certainly take many more trips to mainland Europe than I did years ago, at least 4 per year though I must admit I do try to avoid the busiest tourist periods and indeed the sights that everyone seems to want to tick-off their list.

Posted by
8435 posts

I think the requirement to have a passport to travel to Canada (which has not always been the case) is probably the biggest driver for the upswing in passport requests in recent years for US citizens.

Posted by
2349 posts

That's my guess. You also need one for most cruises, and for Mexico. That requirement went into effect sometime in the mid 2000's.

Speaking of which, did anyone else see the story about 1500 Americans in Michigan doing an annual river float? They drifted into Canada and had to be returned by bus. No passports, of course. Canadian papers were calling them refugees. Drunken refugees.

Posted by
2393 posts

That's my guess. You also need one for most cruises, and for Mexico. That requirement went into effect sometime in the mid 2000's.

Actually not - if the cruise departs & returns from the same US city aka closed loop - a Birth Cert & photo ID are all that is needed. Surprisingly - many cruisers still do not spring for a passport.

Posted by
14580 posts

Hi,

On this last trip in the tourist areas and train stations of Vienna, Frankfurt, Salzburg, Berlin, Prague, the nationalities I saw or heard language wise sometimes daily were Italians, Russians, and Chinese (both Mandarin and Cantonese), more Chinese than Japanese, it certainly was not American English. On the IC and ICE I saw Asians constantly, individual millennials, certainly not so with Anglophones. Traveling now is definitely different in which nationalities you see from what it was 40+ years ago, as respects to Russians, Indians, and Asians.

A few years back, ca 2011, CNN reported that even with more stringent requirements needing a US Passport when traveling, only 25 % Americans have a passport. I've had one constantly renewed since 1971.

Posted by
7049 posts

Relaxation of international Visa requirements for travel makes makes a huge difference for certain countries when their citizens don't have obtain or pay for a pricey travel Visa to visit somewhere. When I went to Argentina, a Visa (for US citizens) was $120 or so and I believe it was only good for one year. When you remove barriers to entry and make it easier to travel, more people will come.

http://travel.usnews.com/features/How-Global-Visa-Changes-Impact-Travelers/

There is a slew of accessible information available for planning purposes, greater ease for do-it-yourself travel, huge marketing reach of the internet has opened up a lot of new places and overemphasized others, and more competition from budget airlines, etc. It is definitely not just baby boomers who have disposable income to travel...travel is more affordable and feasible in general.

Posted by
19118 posts

When I was in Hallstatt in 2009, I noticed quite a few Asians (and Italians, very few Anglos). Then I was at Neuschwanstein in 2013, during Oktoberfest, and a lot of Asians. I can't remember so many Asians before then.

Posted by
15607 posts

Definitely the prosperity and ease of travel restrictions in the Far East means many more Korean, Chinese and Japanese tourists. Also European prosperity and the ease of travel within the EU means that many more Europeans are traveling on the continent - in their own countries as well as foreign ones.

Christi - do those numbers represent only new passport issues or also renewals.

Posted by
10245 posts

And after The Wall came down, we could freely travel inside the former Soviet Union, but even better, they could get out to see the rest of the world. People didn't have much money for hotels those early years, so some slept in cars or tour buses and ate food they brought, but at least they were able to come see the rest of the world. Big change.

Posted by
2393 posts

I am not sure Chani - it does not say. With it being governmental I'd even be afraid to guess as logic does not always apply!

Posted by
14580 posts

Until the 21st century those tourists from the Far East one only saw was that proverbial busload of Japanese businessmen in their blue suits arriving at a site clicking away with their terrific 35 mm cameras. I saw them too a few times in 1970s and '80s. In the 1990s tourists from India were showing up in noticeable numbers. Now, you see a lot more of everyone from the Far East.

Stay at the hostels in Vienna, you can bet on seeing numerous Asian millennials and even older folks speaking Mandarin or Korean, likewise with hotels. On one of the trips to Vienna a few years ago, a Serbian women's group were among the hotel's guests, I saw their tour bus, and it was not peak season, only May. That you would not seen 30 to .40 years ago. Americans may be going or not going over, being deterred by safety concerns, whatever but that does not seem to be the case with other nationalities which you can spot out on a daily basis at the tourist sights and train stations.

Posted by
23343 posts

...Actually not - if the cruise departs & returns from the same US city aka closed loop - a Birth Cert & photo ID are all that is needed. ......

While that is basically true. It is strongly recommended by cruise lines to have a passport and I think most do from our observation. The issue is what happens if you have an emergency need to depart the ship prior to returning to the US. You will need you passport if you fly back early.

I wonder about the statistics and how to read them. For example - In 2015, 15,556,216 were issued. But how many were renewals of the 10,123,424 passports issued in 2005. The data doesn't indicate differences between new passports and renewed passports.

Posted by
2393 posts

I did not mean the title as strictly literal...I was just surprised at the growth of US passports in the past 20 years as opposed to the previous 20 years.

Posted by
7049 posts

I'm not surprised about growth of passports...see airline fee deregulation and dropping of fares over time
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/02/how-airline-ticket-prices-fell-50-in-30-years-and-why-nobody-noticed/273506/

Passports on their own are only one explanation for why there are too many people at top tourists sites...there will always be too many people at the same sites, especially at peak periods, no matter where those people come from. Same reason why too many people go to the same "top" National Parks (Yosemite, Yellowstone, Bryce, etc) relative to others who visit lesser known parks that are often harder to get to (Big Bend in Texas). There are Top 10 "must see" attraction lists everywhere (in hard copy books and online articles) and the same attractions get mega amplification on the internet and get rebroadcasted over and over again through marketing and word of mouth (and let's not forget cruise ships). Call it the Cinque Terre or Dubrovnik Effect.

Posted by
14580 posts

If the price of flights were lower, say suddenly taking a nose dive to $900 departing from the west coast, I wonder how many more would be going over given other pertinent concerns, such as safety, which Americans do factor in, whether perceived or real danger. If flights got down to some fantasy price of $800 to $900, I certainly would be going over more often, or if you didn't have to contend with the Schengen rules.

What I've seen in the last several years, say from 2005, if Americans aren't traveling, lots of others are replacing them in ever increasing numbers, say from Italy, Russians, Asians. South Americans, etc. Look at who are other guests are at the hotels you stay at, what languages are being spoken? More so, if you are traveling off season, obviously, "they" are too.