Hi all, I wonder which of these locations can work for just 2 nights or 3 days in total?
I'll be flying from Sofia so not much time wasted on flights. Those 3 destinations are the cheapest ones from Sofia airport for those days so I was like why not do a quick trip to a city I've never been to. :)
The total amount of days I'll have there would be 2 full days. I'll fly in on May 24th in the morning to either Bergamo, Copenhagen or Budapest airport and I'm flying back on the evening of the 26th.
I'm generally a quick traveler. I rarely ever visit museums and prefer to just walk around looking at classical or modern architecture and try to taste some local food, probably spend 30 min in a café people-watching. I've became really good at getting a quick taste for places. I just want to know which of these locations would be the easiest to manage for such a small time?
- Would 2 nights be enough to see Copenhagen and take a quick day tour to Malmo or even Lund?
- What about Bergamo and Milan - should I skip one of them? Or maybe base myself in Bergamo as there's where the airport low cost airlines use and visit lake Como or another city instead of Milan like Piacenza, Cremona, or even Verona? On many other forums people suggest Verona is safer and more interesting to visit than Milan.
- For Budapest I think the time would be enough, but I'll probably try to do a very brief trip to Bratislava to buy some Slovak food and probably have lunch there as I've lived there and miss the city and the food. :)
All of those trips will be my first to those places. If I go there my trip to Bratislava will be real quick - go there, shop/have lunch and see some locations in the city I miss and go back asap to Budapest. I've never been to Scandinavia or any Mediterranean country so although I miss Central Europe maybe I should postpone Budapest for another time?