Please sign in to post.

Making a tight connection work in your favor

Consider the following: a tight connection in a major European airport of 1 hour 15 minutes on the way home. The flight is booked on a single ticket and it’s the last flight out of there on that day.

Obviously, the airline thinks I can make it, because otherwise they wouldn’t sell the ticket, but in reality it wouldn’t take much of a delay to miss that connecting flight.

Due to EU regulations, at the very least I would be owed food, drinks and hotel accommodations until the next flight could be booked. In other circumstances, for example if the delay is the fault of the airline then I am also entitled to cash compensation.

It seems to me that if you’re in no rush to get home then why not take the gamble of a tight connection? You either get home faster, or get a free trip to another European city with the potential for monetary compensation.

Posted by
4001 posts

In practice the airline will try very hard to make sure you make that connection, so don't count on it. For example LH group airlines have special "connection managers" stationed a the hubs. These person's jobs are to be aware of passengers that are at risk of misconnecting, and do something about it. Things that are regularly done is:
- Holding flights, or at least keeping the door open till the connecting passenger is on board.
- Directly driving them to their next flight, with passport control done on the way.

Actually the main risk is that your luggage does not make it, but you do...

Posted by
2063 posts

A few years ago on a trip home that originated in Nice, France, our flight on Lufthansa was delayed leaving Nice and we missed our connection in Frankfurt to SFO. After waiting over an hour in line, a Lufthansa agent booked us on a United flight out the next afternoon, escorted a group of us back thru immigration where the passport officer, not looking pleased (but do they ever), had the Lufthansa agent throwing up her hands while answering numerous questions and then we were put on a shuttle and taken to a huge block hotel in the industrial section of Frankfurt. Our meals were with a hundred others, a horrible buffet of airplane type food. I might add that the next day, three of us that had gone thru all this and booked on the same plane to SFO were pulled aside while we were waiting at the gate to board and our carryons unzipped and the contents checked by hand. I like adventures but not this kind so I won’t be purposely looking for short connection times with the intent of prolonging my stay.

Posted by
641 posts

I don't know that I agree with this. Perhaps I'd say that I think this is an overly rosy view.

You are right in that "right of care," i.e. food, drinks and lodging, are due if you miss a connection, but there is no guarantee that said food, drink or lodging will be anywhere desirable or convenient (e.g. if you miss a connection at CDG, I doubt you will be put up at a nice boutique hotel in the Marais vs. an anonymous off-airport hotel in Roissy).

Even if you're not in a rush, the replacement itinerary is also not guaranteed to be pleasant -- at peak times you could end up with extra stops, inconvenient middle-of-the-night arrival times, etc. Even if my cab home is paid for at 1am, I'd still rather arrive not in the dead of night!

Posted by
19682 posts

I rarely fly within Europe, so I don't know how time reliable those flights are, timewise. I do know that trans-Atlantic flights can get delayed significantly. On 11 arrival in this century, I've been an hour late arriving in Europe on a flight from the US three times, but I would expect more on time arrivals for flights within Europe, particularly if the cities are fairly close. Of course the problem here is that if you leave late, it's hard to make up time on a short flight.

So I'd agree with your assumption that if you don't have to get back at a certain time, a short connection might not be a bad gamble. But, that is assuming that the airline does reliably cover your missed connection. I'd be interested to hear what other traveler's experiences have been. Did the airline cover it, or were you left on your own?

I was once on a United flight from Denver connecting in Detroit to a Lufthansa flight for Frankfurt. It was winter and they first de-iced the plane; that took an hour, which was the connection time in Detroit. When we got airborne, I mentioned it to the FA and she checked the manifest. There were 13 of us connecting to Lufthansa on the flight. United meet us at the gate with a van and took us to the International terminal where they were holding our connecting flight.

They did that for 13 of us; would they have done the same thing if it had been just me?

BTW, as I sat in the van going between terminals, I was glad that my carry-on bag, my only bag, was sitting on my lap. On the same flight were half a dozen business men going to Stuttgart. The were walking around the gate fat, dumb, and happy, hands-free, having checked all of their bags. I'm sure when they got to Stuttgart, they were still fat and dumb, but maybe not so happy if their bags had not made the now-extremely-short connection.

Posted by
194 posts

Plus, I don't understand why folks don't seem to take into consideration that the airlines can stick you in whatever seat they want.

Which I can tolerate for an hour-ish flight. But for the 10 hours back home? No thanks.

Posted by
9729 posts

There're a lot of things on which I would be willing to take a risk when I was younger and single.

Posted by
10332 posts

I don’t plan connections like this on purpose, but I did have an airline caused missed connection once in Iceland that actually ended up being a very nice extra day on my trip. I always assume something can happen no matter how long a connection is and plan accordingly. Joining a tour or a cruise? Build an extra day or two up front. Headed home? No “must dos” for the next day after return.

Posted by
1440 posts

For me, the absolute last thing I want at the end of a trip is to get caught up in unpredictable circumstances and held up in Europe. I'm not going to put myself in a position that I would have a tight connection in the first place or depend on an airline to uncluster themselves. I also don't care about compensation.

I have a strict general rule that I do not fly within Europe, but that is because I prioritize trains and ferries. Instead, I always position myself at my final European city for a direct flight home to the US. If I have to make a connection, I would much rather do it in the US, like connecting IAD to RIC. This way I am already through immigration/customs and much closer to home. To each their own, but trying to play the system isn't a worthwhile game.

Posted by
9435 posts

Being retired, I figure they will get me home (or there) so why agonize about it. My last trip, we got to the airport in Catania, flight delayed, then cancelled (Non-stop to JFK) and their reschedule was for two days later! No problem, Delta paid for hotel, transport, and meals for two days in Ortigia. Plus, per EU rules, we each picked up 600 euro in compensation. So an extra weekend in Sicily brought us about $2000 in compensation. Of course the cancellation was their fault, so your experience may vary.

Posted by
13603 posts

Due to EU regulations, at the very least I would be owed food, drinks and hotel accommodations until the next flight could be booked. In other circumstances, for example if the delay is the fault of the airline then I am also entitled to cash compensation

Assumes the delay is for a covered compensable reason..

You have a right to compensation if:
your flights were booked as part of a single reservation and
EU air passenger rights apply and
the delay to your arrival time was not caused by extraordinary circumstances
https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/travel/passenger-rights/air/index_en.htm#connectingflight

I did not dig to find what extraordinary circumstances are..

Posted by
192 posts

Assumes the delay is for a covered compensable reason

Actually, what you are insinuating is basically incorrect, which is that sometimes you are not entitled to any compensation at all.

Remember, the scenario described is a single ticketed “tight connection”. No other scenarios are applicable to the discussion. For example, if you decide to leave the airport and not make it back in time for the connecting flight, well that’s another topic entirely.

To reiterate: At the very least the airline is obligated in terms of Right to care. This includes food, and accommodations, even in the event of extraordinary circumstances, whatever those happen to be. At the next level, when the airline is at fault, is when monetary compensation kicks in.

All of this is very well documented.