Please sign in to post.

Itinerary suggestions - Stockholm, Copenhagen, then ???

We are novice travelers looking to finalize our itinerary for this coming May. We are set on flying into Stockholm to visit friends who moved there recently and they suggested Copenhagen as a second city. We have about 10-12 days for this trip and are trying to decide whether to...

  • Stick with just Stockholm and Copenhagen (likely taking a train to get to Copenhagen)
  • Add on Amsterdam
  • Add on a layover in Iceland and spend a couple nights there
  • Visit another friend in Poznan (I'm concerned about the length of train travel time from Copenhagen to Poznan)
  • ??? (your suggestions welcome here)

As I said, we are novice travelers in Europe. In the States, we take lots of public transit and walk when exploring new cities. For activities, we like a balance of sightseeing and downtime exploring cafes and bars (don't want to micro plan every minute of the day). We are in our 40s and like music, art, and walking to see architecture and sights.

So, I guess the ultimate question is whether we should stick to two cities and have more time to explore Stockholm and Copenhagen or if adding on a third city would make more sense. We're trying to plan this with the attitude that this won't be our only trip to Europe!

Posted by
3398 posts

I'm not sure if your 10-12 days includes your flight to and from Scandinavia or not.
Either way, I wouldn't try to do more than two cities unless you really do have at least 12 full days on the ground, not including your arrival/departure days.
If you plan to go by train or fly between Stockholm and Copenhagen, it's at least 5 hours by train...about the same via air since you have to get to the airport at least an hour before your flight. By the time you get to the station/airport, board, disembark, get to your hotel and check in, that's a fairly full day of travel with a bit of time left in the evening.
If you do have 12 full days then I would definitely add Amsterdam.
Stockholm is a beautiful city and you can easily spend 2-3 full days here.
Copenhagen has more to see and 3-4 days are a good length of time for this city. The food scene here is especially interesting!
Amsterdam has the most to see so I would try to get in 3-5 days there if you can. Great bars and museums.

Posted by
7175 posts

If you choose SAS to get to Stockholm, then look at 'open jaw' ticket arrangements, with departure from Copenhagen.

Arrive Stockholm - 4 nights
Train to Oslo - 2 nights
Train to Bergen - 2 nights
Fly to Copenhagen - 3 nights
Depart Copenhagen

Posted by
79 posts

I mostly agree with David that adding Oslo and Bergen to your itinerary would be a nice move BUT I would take the overnight ferry from Copenhagen. We did it last year and it was really fun and easy. Then you may want to take the train to Bergen (check out the website for Norway in a Nutshell). before taking another ferry back to Denmark. Enjoy!

Posted by
11294 posts

I like David's plan a lot. Since Scandinavia is "out of the way" for the more southern parts of Europe, you're unlikely to get to the area on trips to other places. So, while you're going there, focus on destinations there. In a short trip like yours (and, by the way, all of mine), staying in one smaller area is a good way to have a better trip.

When you go from Oslo to Bergen, do it via the Norway In A Nutshell, a coordinated series of trains, boats, and buses. It takes all day, but you get spectacular scenery. You need to reserve parts of it in advance, but it's worth it. All the details (as well as all kinds of other help) are in Rick Steves Scandinavia, which you should purchase ASAP. In particular, you will need his tips on saving money in these potentially expensive places.

Posted by
3280 posts

If you are visiting friends in Stockholm, I would imagine you would want more than 2-3 days. Stockholm has a lot to do and is a lovely city. It reminds me of Boston with the islands and ferries, etc. Stockholm also has some good Jazz. As Copenhagen is easier to get to on other trips, have you ever thought of heading north to Kiruna and the Arctic Circle? I really liked Umeå, but I was relaxed. In May, Swedes are starting to enjoying their woods and trails as the days are getting long. Sweden has a pretty coastline and the archipelago all the way up the coast. On the other hand, between Stockholm and Copenhagen is Eksjö, which had the largest preserved wooden old town of any town in Sweden. You don't have a lot of days, so I'd suggest you enjoy Sweden or at worst include Copenhagen. Save Amsterdam for another trip. The country of Sweden is worth 12 days on its own, IMO.

Posted by
7175 posts

Dreaming of some wintry Scandinavian weather as it's sweltering hot here just at the moment.

Posted by
12308 posts

You should use the ferry system as much as possible. All of these Baltic capitals were built to front the Baltic Sea so ferries replicate the way people actually traveled. One of the highlights of a visit to Stockholm is to see the archipelego that leads from the Baltic into the capitol. If nothing else, take a ferry to Tallinn and back (or a triangle that includes Helsinki), so you get a chance to sail through.

Posted by
12308 posts

Also if you fly SAS, I believe your ticket entitles you to good offers for getting around the region (it did when we flew them). If you don't have time to ferry, you should also look at flights to get around Scandinavia - trains are expensive and not particularly convenient.

Posted by
1717 posts

Hello Sue. If you will be at Europe a total of 10 days, I recommend going to Stockholm and Copenhagen. And you will have time for one or two day trips (via trains) from Copenhagen. Ride in the Express train from Stockholm to Copenhagen. I liked Stockholm and Copenhagen.