I'm starting the preliminary planning process for a trip in early May combing the UK and Spain. I want to see Madrid for the art musuems, Malaga for the sun and to get over what looks to be a very cold Chicago winter, and London for the culture and to see a friend there. I've been to the UK numerous times, still haven't made it to Spain.
My initial idea was fly from ORD (Chicago O'hare) to Madrid for about 3 days, then Malaga. Should I train or fly to Malaga? I'd spend about 4 days in Malaga, then fly to London for a week or so in the UK. As of now, I don't know if I"ll spend the whole week in London or visit another UK city, I'll depend on my friend's work schedule.
. My rationale behind this plan is that I'd booked the two major cities with the relaxing time in Malaga. I'd have to use a European low cost carrier to get to London, and I'm going to try to avoid any airport in London besides LGW, LHR, LCY, and I think I'd prefer to avoid Gatwick if I can, since I know it's not particularly convenient. At all costs, I'd avoid LTN or STN.
Does this sound reasonable? Should I consider flying from Chicago to Malaga, then train or fly to Madrid? I can certainly get a flight from MAD to LHR. The advantage of flying to Malaga is that I can get over jet lag there and then hit Madrid and London full speed ahead.
The other option is to start out in London, fly to Malaga, and then train or fly from Malaga and end the trip in Madrid. It's certainly easy to get a flight from MAD to ORD.
Any thoughts? And, thanks in advance for your help.