We will be visiting Edinburgh as well as London and have some extra time. Should we extend our trip in Scotland and go to Glasgow before flying back to London, or leave Edinburgh and go to Bath instead of Glasgow? Thank you!
Posted by
Tresana, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA
23650 posts
Flip a coin. They are really not comparable. Bath is far more historical being an old Roman city but Glasgow is interesting also.
Posted by
New York City, NY, USA
5678 posts
Really, really different palces. Glasgow is marvelous with lots of energy and interesting museums--the Riverside, The Tenement House, Kelvingrove, the Burrell Collection and more. It's quite different from Edinburgh and can offer a contrasting perspective of Scotland.
Pam
Posted by
Edinburgh
2687 posts
easy enough to visit Glasgow from Edinburgh only 45 minutes on the train.
Posted by
Michigan, United States
703 posts
We did Bath as a day trip out of London & loved it. Very historical, interesting sites, walkable. Our trip was with London Walks and we took the train to get there. As I recall we left around 9am and got back around 6pm. Never been to Glasgow so I can't comment on that. Whichever you choose, enjoy!
Posted by
Edinburgh
2687 posts
you can fly from Edinburgh to Bristol with Easyjet, from Bristol it is a fairly short bus ride from the airport to Bath