Please sign in to post.

Anti-Bucket List Travel

What is a popular travel destination that just doesn't catch your fancy? How about any popular tourist sites that just doesn't do it for you? Why?

I skipped the Blarney Stone as it just seemed kitschy to me. Plus, I'm not kissing that rock.

Australia, New Zealand, and the Far East. It's not that I'm disinterested as much as I quite dislike long flights. I had my fill of that in the Air Force. I'm good for about 8 hours to Europe and that's about it. I just don't fancy sitting for long periods of time. I nap, or not, read a little and watch two movies, and then we're on final approach. That's enough.

Posted by
2055 posts

Oktoberfest-I know it's supposed to be a Bavarian tradition but the appeal leaves me cold. Probably why I'm going offseason to Germany.

Venice-Maybe back in the 1970s-1980s but it's gotten way too crowded and any charm has left.

Dubai-I know it's supposed to be an "in" place but shopping has never been my favorite thing to do.

Versailles- I've been to Paris three times and never saw this palace. I hate crowds and frankly even seeing the royal palace in Madrid got tiring for me.

Same with Buck House-but then I'm not a monarchist.

Posted by
4627 posts

I said the same about Australia and New Zealand but now have reservations to go in 2024. I just can't resist all that beautiful natural scenery. For me, Cinque Terra because of the crowds and I don't like heights. I've been to Germany twice but returning there to see other places is not high on my list for political reasons. China is a no because of their policy of covering up the emergence of deadly diseases.

Posted by
4297 posts

Interesting question Big Mike. I have to give it some thought but one place that comes to mind is the Amalfi coast. I’ve seen other friends’ pictures and I’m not impressed. I have no desire to go any place that is a glorified beach resort.

I agree with Oktoberfest (hate beer) and cinque Terra (too crowded).

Posted by
3135 posts

I loved Oktoberfest when I was 25 and could recover quickly after getting plastered, but at 62 it has no appeal for me.

Agree with Venice. We went during the 80s and then again during the late 90s and the crowds were suffocating. I've been to Versailles twice and that's enough. Regrettably, the same with the Louvre. Both places were beyond jam-packed when I last visited in June of 2018.

Posted by
8337 posts

Ireland in general holds little interest to me. We went and were absolutely bored. Went into a smaller city's local pub and found 8 guys watching a soccer game on television. Satellite TV has destroyed much of the pub lifestyle for the locals. I can stay home and watch the grass grow. Dublin was also our least favorite city in Europe.

Other destinations that we don't care to visit are BIG AMERICAN CITIES. Been to most all of them traveling on business. We once flew in to NYC for the night after a few days in London. What a dirty, filthy place. And they won't even let you carry your pistol there.

Posted by
3135 posts

David, I'm right there with you. I liked the hustle and bustle of big cities when I was younger, but now I'm not much of a fan of crowds and traffic. We loved Ireland outside of Dublin, although there are some interesting sites to visit in that area.

Posted by
1037 posts

I will chime in here and concur with others:

Went to Venice back in the 80s, once was enough, never again...
Missed out on Cinque Terre before bucket listers made it too crowded 20+ years ago, no interest now...
No on Oktoberfest...really, same with Munich - been there, done it, not again...time is better spent elsewhere in Germany...
Someone mentioned skipping large US cities, and I agree...been there, done it, no more interest in that kind of travel...

Places I have never made it to and have quietly removed from my so-called bucket list: India...China...Russia (duh)...entire continents: Africa and South America...

Places I have never visited but intend to visit sooner rather than later: Poland...Ireland...Spain...Australia / NZ...Korea...Thailand...more Eastern Europe / the Baltics...

Places I never tire of and return to as often as possible: France...UK...Norway...Sweden...Budapest...Berlin...Japan...

Plenty left to see, need to get back on the road, not gettin' any younger.

Posted by
9022 posts

I agree with JojoRabbit - no place in Africa or South America interests me. Just to be contrary, I'll say Iceland and the south of France don't interest me. But places you don't want to go back to seems different to me. If you've already been there, then they're not potential bucket list anyway. A list of places you were disappointed by would be a whole 'nother topic.

I would love to go back to New Zealand and Australia, but spouse is not interested. Yeah its the long flight.

Posted by
8159 posts

I don't have a real desire to visit Ireland, China or South Africa. I might change my mind but I don't feel the excitement in my soul that I feel when I think about other places I want to visit or revisit, like Scandinavia, Iceland, Scotland, India, Japan and South America.

But I do like some large US cities - I love visiting New York, heading to the garment district for fabric, spending time with friends who live there, seeing a show. I've been there a lot so I tend to do less touristy things when I'm there but I have a real fondness for the city. I also love San Francisco with its Mission district and the area all around it.

Posted by
8322 posts

I am 75 years old and live in Saudi Arabia for five years, then Germany for four years. Then I retired in 2010 and have done 2-3 trips a year visiting all the continents except Antartica.

We have been to Australia twice, NZ once, Japan, China (twice), most of the East Asian countries, India, several mid-east countries, 80% of Europe, including Russia, the Baltic countries and Ukraine. Also, most of the South American countries except Venezuela, Bolivia, Brazil and Paraguay. For Africa, we have done Egypt, Morocco, and did a wonderful safari in Kenya and Tanzania.
Also, done several Caribbean countries on a cruise as well as Alaska and much of Canada.

It has all been great. I would advise those that disdain a trip to South America or Africa to thing again. Those places are amazing. The safari especially, as well as Egypt and Machu Picchu in Peru.

About the one place I have little interest is Antartica. Cruises there are very expensive and I understand that frequently bad weather can make it difficult to see land.

Posted by
18 posts

No more big American cities for me either; too much noise, traffic, litter and rude people.

I'm just beginning to plan a trip this fall to Scotland, Ghent, Bruges, Amsterdam and Paris. Not one museum in being considered.

Ireland just doesn't do it for me, nor do any of the countries of Scandinavia. I spent three years in Germany in the U.S. Army and have drunk my share of good German beer. I've gone to too many beer and wine fests to remember. Oktoberfest holds no interest for me. In a former life, I spent almost 10 years in Korea and in the 70s and 80s visited Japan and Hong Kong. Once in each place was enough.

I agree that eight hours on a plane are enough. I'm a nervous flyer and have to help the pilot fly the plane, so, I never sleep and always arrive tired and groggy.

Posted by
1037 posts

I would advise those that disdain a trip to South America or Africa to thing again. Those places are amazing

And I am sure they are amazing.

But since I nixed those for myself in my prior post, I can further explain it this way: I am older now, and the ravages of age and health are more evident, so no matter how I slice it, my years of arduous foreign travel are fewer now than they were even pre pandemic, the lost years. I am being honest with myself and am simply trimming the list of the places that compel me the least, focusing more realistically on the trips I want to take more, and for just new places alone there is at least a 5 to 10 year supply of those...and then there are the places I return to at every opportunity...my list still runneth over...

Posted by
7054 posts

Isn't life too short to dwell on what you don't want to do, or don't want to see? These types of "negative/ anti" threads always draw out comments about places that cause others to be defensive because invairably someone will knock someone else's beloved location or even their home city (and rather harshly too). I say let's focus on the positive side of travel - i.e. places that people are excited about and want to share with others.

Posted by
33994 posts

If you can't say something nice about somebody, say nothing. Same about destinations.

Posted by
3135 posts

Just because one isn't interested in visiting a certain location doesn't mean it's bad, but not everyone's cup of tea.

I'm certain many or most people have little interest in visiting West Virginia, but I'm not thin-skinned about it. To each their own. Vive le difference.

Life is short, thus we have to pick and choose what interests us. No reason to obsess or dwell on it. Just sharing thoughts. Not everything is unicorns and rainbows to everyone.

Let's lighten up a bit.

Posted by
16411 posts

The land of Lilliput. I read about it but it doesn't seem like Xanadu to me.

Posted by
7168 posts

Places I have been (only for a couple of days each) and have no desire to ever go again: London, Rome, Istanbul, Texas (all of it), Florida (all of it), Jamaica, Mexico.

Places I have not been and still have no interest to go: Spain, Portugal, Russia, Most Middle Eastern countries, India, Egypt (and other African nations, but not all of them - would love to go on a safari and visit South Africa), Hawaii.

And, even if some consider this a negative post, I think it's intetesting to hear about others' taboo places.

Posted by
1744 posts

Such places are few and far between, but I don't have much interest in visiting Australia, for no particular reason other than it has just never caught my fancy.

Las Vegas was a place that never interested me at all. However, my daughter wanted to do a little getaway after she graduated from university, and her friends weren't available, so we went to Las Vegas, because it was a cheap and easy trip. (Indeed, many things about Vegas are cheap and easy. LOL.) It was okay. We loved our hotel. Fremont Street was fun. We did a day trip to the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, stopping at Hoover Dam and Seligman, and I really loved that. We saw a couple of great shows and went to a really fun drag brunch. But Las Vegas was so busy and loud and there was so much excess and waste--all things I don't like. I can't imagine ever going back. Been there; done that; didn't bother to get a t-shirt.

I thought as you did about the Blarney Stone, and even when we ended up on a tour this past May that included Blarney Castle (my focus was the Rock of Cashel), I had no intention of standing in line to kiss the stone. Well, didn't it turn out that there was hardly any lineup to speak of, so I did it. And I thought Blarney Castle was really pretty and charming, and the grounds were a lot of fun.

Similarly, I had no intention of seeing the Leaning Tower of Pisa when I was in Italy. However, we found Florence quite busy and had seen what we most wanted to see there, and had done a fair bit of wandering around and exploring, also, and we still had a day (and had visited Sienna, too). So, we decided to get out of Dodge and go to Pisa. Well, again, I liked it far more than I expected. I thought the town was charming and picturesque, and I thought the tower and baptistry were gorgeous and would have been worth seeing even if the tower didn't lean.

So, I won't completely rule out my "anti-bucket list" places. If the opportunity presented itself to go, I would grab it, and would probably enjoy myself.

Posted by
1606 posts

Places I have been that weren't my vibe: Italy.
Places that I haven't been that aren't on the list: South America, Africa, China and Russia.

I think this is a topic worthy of discussion as input from others may change your mind and give you the opportunity for a fabulous experience.

I am fascinated by how a person who is going to travel picks the next destination. My own process even fascinates me.
I became aware that my own choices may be limiting me because those choices may be influenced by unwarranted discomfort.
Because of this, I have asked my husband to contribute to the destination picking process. He doesn't travel but has traveled in his youth.

For example, he really wanted me to see Florence. I was not interested in going to Italy. I spent 3 weeks in Italy. I am very glad I went. I am a much better person for having been there and learning what it had to teach me. I loved the museums in Florence and I enjoyed Rome, but otherwise, meh.

I also had no interest in going to Paris. This was just wrong! I went to Paris due to the urging of DH and now I am in LOVE. I predict I will go back to Paris over and over and over and over again.

I didn't want to go to Asia (except I chose Turkey). In 2024 I am going to Japan. It will add a colorful thread to my tapestry, I am sure.

So, my point is, sometimes you can eat somebody else's pizza and it will be delicious. If it isn't, then you know not to eat it again.

If I live long enough and have enough money and my health is good, I may even make it to South America, Africa, China and Russia.

Posted by
755 posts

One thing I don’t think anyone has mentioned is climate. I went to Hawaii as a teenager and really disliked it. So hot and muggy and it made me never want to go anywhere tropical again. And I’m sure other people avoid other parts of the world because of temperature - or bugs.

Posted by
1744 posts

rachele, definitely climate and insects are two big factors in my decision-making. I don't necessarily rule places out completely because of it, but I definitely do my research and try to visit during relatively cooler and less buggy times of the year.

For instance, when we went to Namibia, we chose travelling during their winter (our summer) for a few reasons. 1. Temperature. It's cooler and drier during their winter. In fact, there were times we needed a jacket during the evening or early morning, although mid-day was definitely like a summer day for us. 2. Bugs. Because it's drier and cooler, there are fewer bugs (and snakes) out and about during their winter. The worst things I saw were corn crickets--hideous but harmless. We saw one spider--a "Platte Annie" (also harmless), and no scorpions. We saw one poisonous snake--a green mamba smushed on the road--and a couple of harmless ones. I had spent a lot of time worrying about the insects, since I have a phobia, but it was really no problem, because of the time of year. 3. It is easier to see the animals during Namibia's winter. Because Namibia is mostly desert, the animals are drawn to the waterholes during the dry, winter season.

Note: I had also worried about Namibia being physically challenging, and we figured we'd better go before we got much older. However, it turned out to be one of our easier trips. There was less time walking and more time riding in vehicles (on safari). The "mid-range" lodges we stayed in were the height of luxury for us. And our guide was very solicitous--insisting on carrying our bags to our rooms, even though we travelled light and could easily manage, cooking a "braii" lunch for us in a dry riverbed while we were looking for desert-adapted elephants, treating us to a "sundowner" on a hill with spectacular views on my husband's birthday, changing the tire when we got a flat, and putting out chairs for us to relax in while he did so. We felt pampered, and we say now that we will consider going back when we get too old to walk for blocks and blocks on cobblestones and hills.

On the other hand, I'm really glad we went to Machu Picchu and the Galapagos Islands before we were much older. Climbing the MP ruins' stairs and doing the little hike to the Sun Gate, and all the snorkelling we did in the Galapagos, was something we enjoyed immensely but might have more trouble doing as the years go by.

This year, we went to two places that have had conflicts during our lifetime: Croatia and the North of Ireland. Those are both places we wouldn't have dreamed of going, say, 20 years ago or so. So, I keep an open mind and never say never, but there are definitely places that are more appealing than others.

Posted by
4627 posts

Those who don't like hot, muggy, and buggy need to add Charleston to their anti-bucket list. We give new meaning to all three words, just as Arizona gives new meaning to the word "hot"(when it's 100 degrees at 9 am)

Posted by
967 posts

Don't have a strong compulsion to go to Egypt to see the pyramids. Its not like you get to go in them or anything. And friends tell me that Cairo is a terrible place to use as a home base. No interest in any where in Mexico or South America. Going to Japan or China would just confuse us. The cultural divide is too vast. We have never found a good reason to go to Ireland or upper Scotland. Watched many travel logs on travel in Africa, and well, .... I can see a Zebra in a local zoo. No interest in the Middle East and places like Dubai - I'm left handed., These places would be depressing. :) .

Posted by
538 posts

Climate plays a large part of my travel choices. I gravitate toward cooler climates and almost always travel during shoulder season. I would love to go to Singapore, but I don't think I could tolerate the humidity. I also have zero desire for a beach vacation ever again.

I have also, like someone else said, become less fond of big cities as I've gotten older. I was in New York and London this past year (have been to both previously) and think I'd be okay not going back to either. I don't feel that way about all big cities - I adore Berlin and went twice last year - but something about the packed feeling of NYC and London, I found them both way overstimulating and couldn't wait to leave.

I keep trying to make myself go to Ireland, but somehow can't quite move it to the top of my list. Many travelers (not just here) have indicated Dublin is nothing special. I don't want to drive in Ireland, so I feel like a trip there might be a bit of a waste if I can only go where the train will take me.

And lastly, Las Vegas - was at the top of my 'never go' list but my younger son and I went in 2021 during his spring break. We did not set foot on the strip so maybe it doesn't count (we did go see the Neon Boneyard), but instead did three days of day hikes in Utah and around the city, including the gorgeous Valley of Fire State Park. I'd go back again in a heartbeat for the abundance of natural beauty around the city.

Posted by
4115 posts

I had a more firm idea about my non bucket list yesterday. We were sent a notice (Scott’s now Going) about a mistake airfare for a little over $100 RT for a flights from SFO to several South American airports. My husband looked a couple up on the airline’s website and sure enough he could book them for late fall travel. I wasn’t interested, even at $100. I’m afraid that says something about me as I become less adventurous. I told him if we get a notice about ANY airport in Europe he can book that without even asking me.

Posted by
1334 posts

For me, it’s mostly the Caribbean and/or some sort of cruise. I don’t generally seek out warm weather destinations, I’ve got a conference in Florida that’s been moved to June from the regular November time frame and I’m already not looking forward to that weather.

For the USA, as interesting as it would be to see Alaska/Hawaii, I’m not interested enough to deal with the long domestic flights.

Posted by
2556 posts

Ditto to Agnes and Nigel. And don’t knock something until you’ve tried it (for me that includes haggis). We have traveled on 6 continents and have not regretted going to any of them. All of these places have something wonderful and unique to offer. We haven’t been to Australia or New Zealand yet but those are on our list. I hear they are beautiful. Keep an open mind to new places and experiences.

Posted by
3135 posts

If we don't like a thread, maybe not read it? Or stop reading it.

Anyway, a colleague was in the Army stationed in Hawaii. I told him I envied him. He was not a fan of Hawaii at all. Said it was too touristy and crowded. I was surprised by his answer.

Posted by
1715 posts

I don’t mind this thread at all. I find it interesting to hear what places people have no desire to visit and why. I don’t think it’s negative. I think it’s part of being human.

I generally don’t mind crowded places because those places are usually beautiful, to me, and hold my interest for historical and cultural reasons and for its beauty. So I will visit crowded places. I would love to visit Venice, for example, regardless of how crowded it is. But I do not like or enjoy crowded events where people are drinking, loud, obnoxious, bumping into everyone, etc. For these reasons, I have absolutely no desire to attend New Years Eve celebrations in Times Square or anywhere else, including Boston, and I live fairly close to Boston.

The Dominican Republic doesn’t interest me.

I am not saying I will never visit Africa or the Middle East, but they are at the bottom of my travel bucket list. One reason is for safety. And reading about how women are harassed in some of these countries. I am unsure about India. I have in-laws who have visited and they found it very fascinating. But I don’t know if I want to see a lot of poverty while traveling. I know extreme poverty exists, but I don’t want it in my face. And I am concerned about intestinal problems in some of these poorer countries. I visited China 3 times, which I love and is very fascinating. In fact, Xinjiang Province, and especially Kashgar, is the most exotic and unique place I have visited, but I have always had intestinal problems while visiting China. Good thing I had Cipro on me!

Posted by
1744 posts

Agree, Dale. Both my husband and I have zero desire to go on cruises, although we know people who love them. They just aren't our style.

Posted by
3514 posts

It’s always interesting to hear which places are on our lists….or not.
After all, if we all liked or wanted to visit the same places, they would be crowded all year round.
I have no desire to visit China, though I did enjoy Hong Kong before it reverted back to China.
Same with Mexico.
I’m not a beach lover, so have no wish to go there as I feel safety outside of resorts would worry me.
Give me a big bustling city: Naples, NYC, London, etc and I’m happy.
And no desire to kiss a germy, grubby rock, though I’d like to visit Ireland one day.

Posted by
275 posts

Obviously for me, Australia, New Zealand and East Asia are short or shortish trips for me, so I have spent plenty of time travelling in all of those. In fact I am going to Malaysia in less than 2 months time. Europe requires 20+ hour flights, but I am willing to put up with those flights because I love Europe.

On the other hand I am not a beach holiday person. So I have not been to the smaller islands in the Pacific like Fiji, Tahiti, etc because they do not really interest me. Even when I go to Malaysia, I will not be going to their big beach destination, Langkawi. Nor did I like Phuket in Thailand which is a big beach destination in that country. I have been to the Gold Coast here in Australia, and I did not like that either, I much preferred the mountainous hinterlands inland from there.

Posted by
49 posts

From the frequently mentioned list: I was in Venice in October and loved it. Will return, even if just for cicchetti. Dublin was a fantastic place when I spent time there a few decades ago, and I definitely want to visit Ireland again.

I have no desire to ever visit Dubai again, but I liked Las Vegas much more than I should, even though I don't gamble.

I have never been to southeast Asia, Africa, or South America. It isn't that I am disinterested, but they seem hard to get to and there is so much of Europe still to see. Paradoxically, I am keen to get to central Asia/Caucuses and India despite the difficulties/distance.

I will probably get to Scandinavia at some point, but I really can't see spending vacation money to do it. There just isn't enough of the sort of art and history I crave to make it worth the expense.

Posted by
1359 posts

Florida ,did not want to go first time and ,for me, it's multiples worse than I thought

Posted by
1105 posts

See the thread on comfort zone. This is almost the same thing, excepting people have rationalized it out.

Posted by
1937 posts

I understand not wanting to go somewhere because you wouldn't enjoy the climate or the crowds or the conditions. I just got back from a trip to Colombia, and I got badly bitten by mosquitoes on the Caribbean coast (despite all the DEET I slathered on) and dealt with horrendous heat in Cartagena. I was a great trip overall, and Cartagena is one of the most delightfully charming cities I've ever been to, but I think in the future I will forego hot, humid, mosquito-ridden destinations. This kind of makes me sad, because there are a lot of places I'd love to see and experience, but I just don't manage these conditions well. Fortunately it's a big world. There are a lot of places I haven't been that don't have conditions I find so unpleasant.

I think anyone who rejects any place based on culture is sadly lacking in the kind of intellectual curiosity that makes travel worthwhile. I suppose if you just want to go look at sights, enjoy scenery, and visit museums, that's fine, but I pity you for what you are missing. That style of travel is certainly not in the spirit of Rick Steves.

The only anti-bucket list items for me are cruises and all-inclusive beach resorts.

Posted by
3135 posts

Richard and Lane, I agree. Hot and humid is a deterrent to me. I lived in Florida for four years and it was like living in a furnace for 8 months out of the year, plus it has become so overcrowded in many areas. I don't miss Orlando at all.

edit after reading posts below: No interest in all-inclusive resorts like Sandals. Sitting around eating and drinking all day has no appeal for me. I'd get bored quickly. Same with a beach. I'm fine walking or spending a couple of hours at the beach, but that's about it.

Posted by
4625 posts

Any beach, or all-inclusive resorts. My head would explode if I had to sit by a pool or on a beach doing nothing day after day after....

Posted by
1321 posts

Oktoberfest
Amalfi Coast
England or Ireland
Spain (although I would like to visit northern Spain)
Prague
Mexico
Egypt or really most of Africa some of that for me is politics.
India
The middle East

Yikes, I have a longer list then I was expecting, BUT some of these places I would visit if someone else planned the trip and said let's go

Posted by
755 posts

@ Lane: I should have said in my post that certain cultures don't interest me because I know enough about them to understand what they are about.. As a California native and life long resident, I know enough about the Mexican culture not to want to spend my vacation time in Mexico, because the Mexican culture is right here with friends, co-workers, and family. I am more interested in cultures I know less about, but yet aren't "violent in nature, or "governed" by corrupt leaders", as periscope said so well.
And, although I have never been on a Rick Steves tour, I believe that they probably are mostly about looking at sights, enjoying scenery, and visiting museums - activities in which culture is certainly absorbed - in the spirit of Rick Steves.

Posted by
147 posts

Bucket lists, must see, must do, best restaurant, best train route, etc, etc are all artificial contrivances at least to my mind. I’ve been to 70 countries and anywhere I haven’t been is another place to go.

Trying to milk every last drop of experience is insane. I haven’t regretted a place I’ve visited so off to the next adventure!

Posted by
1037 posts

I haven’t regretted a place I’ve visited so off to the next adventure!

Nor have I ever regretted any place I ever visited, but a few were "once is enough" for me, and that is the spirit of my earlier postings.

I have neither endless financial resources or the time to throw darts at the map (who does?), hence why I and I assume others have a "list" of places I most want to visit and revisit. In the making of a list like that, some places will be nearer the bottom and may never get visited by me, and I am OK with that.

Posted by
1072 posts

We skipped the fake Juliet's balcony in Verona.

And we have been to Amsterdam three times without stepping foot in Anne Frank's House (spoiler - it's not the real house).

We visited Stockholm, but not the Abba museum.

And Copenhagen twice without seeing the Little Mermaid.

For entire locations, Bali - as an Australian it is a very popular beach holiday, but it has the reputation of being filled with drunken Aussies getting tattoos and venereal diseases they will subsequently regret - kind of the Aussie answer to Spring Break. Popular for end of season sports team trips.

Posted by
2457 posts

Anne Frank House not real? Maybe he means not a house in the general.sense as they !lived upstairs over the office???

Posted by
1744 posts

There's a video taken of a wedding party outside the church next door, and it shows a glimpse of Anne looking out the window at the bride. There are items on the wall that Anne pasted there.

Posted by
4183 posts

It's been my experience that going to places I'd resisted was much more enlightening and enjoyable than I ever thought it would be. I just needed to get over myself, including any preconceived notions I had about those places.

That doesn't mean that I'd necessarily return or that any became frequent destinations for me. But then I rarely return to any destination unless there are things I missed on the previous visits there, or they are flight transfer locations where I want to ease out before going on to my real first stop for that trip.

I live in a very quiet and dark location. Dirt roads, lots of wildlife, very few houses and no street lights. Due to our close proximity to Kitt Peak, exterior lighting on our houses is severely restricted. It must be low wattage and point down with a cover on the top of the fixture or be under a porch.

Perhaps as a result, I enjoy visiting densely populated towns and walkable cities with real public transportation. I like the contrast.

For years I've schemed on a 4 or 5 week trip where I'd spend one week each in 3 or 4 major European cities I've never been to before and 1 week in one I have . The difficulty would be choosing the cities. There are really no EU or NATO places that I'd classify as anti-bucket.

However, I do have a hard time with noise. That's the primary reason NYC is #1 on my anti-bucket list. I made the decision to never return over 35 years ago. It is never quiet there. Fortunately, most of the European cities I've been to are much quieter than NYC, making returns to them or visiting others possible targets.

I don't get the attraction of tropical locations and climates, whether they are in the Atlantic or the Pacific. So Hawaii, other Pacific islands and the Caribbean countries will never see me on their beaches.

Similarly, the countries of the Far East and Middle East don't call to me. I like the food from most, the fabrics, jewelry and ceramics from some, but I'm definitely not interested in the human rights records and the level of population density of most. The long plane ride to any of them is another negative.

Australia and New Zealand are both places I once wanted to go. I actually considered the possibility of moving there in my early 30's when they were recruiting US trained librarians. Now my age and that long plane ride puts them in my anti-bucket.

Having been to Mexico for 2 long trips and many cross-border excursions back when I was much younger, having never been to Mexico City and having friends who've retired there from the US and Canada, Mexico is not an anti-bucket location for me. Full disclosure: I was born and grew up in San Antonio. Love the history, the art, the cultures and the food.

I'm glad that I went to Moscow and Leningrad in the early 1980's before the wall came down. I worked for the US Army in Nuremberg and was on a German tour. It was fascinating, even though we were obviously followed. I've had no desire to return.

Posted by
4625 posts

I'd do Space in a heartbeat, only the cost holds me back.

Posted by
1037 posts

For years I've schemed on a 4 or 5 week trip where I'd spend one week each in 3 or 4 major European cities I've never been to before and 1 week in one I have

My wife and I did a trip like that in October 2018. One week each, in this order: Paris, Budapest, Berlin, and London. Now I had been to all of them previously, and she had been to Paris and London, but Berlin and Budapest were new for her. It is our favorite trip all time...the longest one we ever took, too, one of the advantages of retirement vs the days of squeezing trips to Europe into as little as a week or at most 2 weeks during our working years.

Posted by
1037 posts

Nobody has yet mentioned the ultimate destination: Space.

Hello Captain Kirk..."Space: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise. Its five-year mission: to explore strange new worlds. To seek out new life and new civilizations. To boldly go where no man has gone before!"

Posted by
20468 posts

Jojo Rabbit I put that on the favorite travel quote thread. No one was amused.

On the topic, Plitvice Lakes. Been there. Sorry, just dont understand why someone would want to spend an entire precious day of holiday there; Split was a close second on the disappointment scale.

BigMikeWestByGodVirginia I am with you on long flights, but just discovered that Thailand is a 15 hour flight from Budapest .... so options come to mind.

Posted by
11608 posts

I love Italy but have no desire to stay on the Amalfi Coast.
I have heard bad stories from friends about India so have dropped it from my travel list.
Long, long flights don’t bother me if I am going somewhere I really want to go like Asia. I have been to most Asian countries but still have to visit several more of them.

Posted by
46 posts

My anti bucket list: joining the Mile High Club-no way. One of my general travel philosophies is not to travel anywhere that I would need to bring my own oxygen, therefore eliminating outer space, Mt. Everest and scuba diving.

Posted by
1682 posts

Negative reviews on destinations, and places to eat and sleep, are as important as positive reviews. Forums are all about opinions, even if a particular opinion may malign your beloved favourite haven. One man's Venice is another man's Skegness.