Hello everyone.
We have 6 days in hand for this trip and it will start/end at Frankfurt. I fail to decide between both options, even after reading older posts, so seeking help here to figure it.
We love architecture as well as landscape scenery, which could remain in our memory and photos for long. Photography matters (light, streetscapes, viewpoints, overall mood). If I remove logistics (which is manageable I feel), I have two options:
Option 1: Germany + Alsace (more nature-driven) - Rothenburg ob der Tauber, Alsace villages: Riquewihr, Ribeauvillé, Kaysersberg, Black Forest area: Gutach Valley, Gengenbach (scenic drives, villages)
Option 2: Bruges and Ghent (Belgium) + Alsace (more architecture-driven)
From a “lasting memory + photography” point of view, which option tends to feel more rewarding?
Does Bruges + Ghent feel sufficiently different from places which I would skip, except Alsace, to justify or does it start to feel visually repetitive?
Conversely, does adding the Black Forest meaningfully deepen the experience after Alsace, or does it feel more like “pleasant filler” rather than a highlight?
If you personally had only 6 days total, starting/ending in Frankfurt, which option would you choose.
Appreciate any insight, especially from those who have done these places with photography/scenery-focused travel style.
Thanks much.