Please sign in to post.

Should I change flight through Schiphol Airport.

I will be going on a river cruise in Aug. My flight is from Msp to Basel on Aug. 17. I will be changing planes at Schiphol with 2 hr 35 min to get to the other plane. I am concerned about this as the cruise starts on the 18th. I checked and if I miss my flight, there is only 1 other flight that would get me to the ship in time. My airfare was arranged by the cruise line. Usually, I would have a day in between arrival and a cruise. I am considering contacting the cruise line to see if I could change the flight to the 16th. I know that a lot could change by Aug., but I sure don't want to miss the start of the cruise. I do have travel insurance. Unfortunately, I will be flying home from Schiphol, too. Any thoughts?

Posted by
3999 posts

For peace of mind, I would contact the cruise line to alter your travel arrangements to what you need.

Posted by
8375 posts

It seems like most problems at Schiphol have to do with lines going through security. You would already be airside if that makes a difference.

Posted by
2267 posts

If you're flying out of MSP then Paris could be your only other option for a one-connection ticket. And I'd take AMS over CGD all day long.

Posted by
401 posts

I connected through AMS last month and was worried about the same issue due to all the bad articles I was reading about long lines there. My flight included a 3-hour layover there. The longest thing in my experience was walking from one end of the terminal to the other, which seemed to take forever. The immigration line was very long, but they had at least ten agents working, and it in fact took less than 20 minutes. Walking from my arrival gate to my departure gate took longer than that.

Posted by
2341 posts

Not arguing for or against your choice, but reporting my actual experience arriving at AMS on June 9, 8:30 a m. Carry on bags. Smooth sailing and literally zero line at immigration. Time from landing to Amsterdam Centraal train station was an hour and 15 minutes. YMMV. Will report on return experience later in June, not holding my breath we will get that lucky again.

Posted by
6384 posts

If you're insisting on flying to Basel your options will be limitied as has been mentioned.

But, Basel has a very small airport and the easiest way to get to Basel is usually to fly to Zürich or Frankfurt and take the train the last bit. That will give you a lot more options.

Posted by
1305 posts

If you booked this all on 1 ticket, you will remain airside and the only thing you have to do is go thru passport control. At the passport control for transit passengers there is a fast lane for passengers of flights that will leave shortly. So even if your incoming flight is late, you can still make your connecting flight. If you want peace of mind, you can of course arrange to leave a day earlier, but I see no reason to avoid Schiphol as a transit passenger.

Posted by
610 posts

If all goes well you should have no problem. My preference is to arrive the day before the ‘ship sails.’ Many things could happen that impact flights - weather delays, cancellations, getting bumped, mechanical delays, etc. Naturally it’s a balance between time, expense, comfort level…!

Have a great cruise.

Posted by
4518 posts

At the passport control for transit passengers there is a fast lane for passengers of flights that will leave shortly.

This is pretty sophisticated. There's a board showing flights leaving in 30 minutes and once your flight is posted there is at least one airport staff member herding people with boarding passes for those flights into a fast lane. There is no security check at AMS for transit passengers.

I would leave things as they are and try not to worry about it. Delta places a priority on these flights operating on time so late arrival is not really much of a possibility. The planes go back and forth day after day, AMS>>MSP, then MSP>>AMS, then repeat again. It's 8-1/2 hours flying time for a 12 hour time interval so even when there is a late arrival it doesn't roll forward to affect the next flight.

Edit: I see now that you are flying KLM the whole trip, but what I said about Delta still applies to KLM.

Posted by
1305 posts

“ There is no security check at AMS for transit passengers.”
Please be aware that whether or not transit passengers need to go thru security at Schiphol depends on where you’ve arrived from. If the country you arrived from is not on the safe list (i.e. if their security checks aren’t up to standard) you will need to go thru security again at Schiphol. The USA, all European countries and various other countries are on the safe list, but not all countries are.
In this case the OP doesn’t have to go thru security at Schiphol, but this isn’t a general rule that applies to all transit passengers.

Posted by
211 posts

Thanks everyone for your input. I haven't decided yet what we should do.

Posted by
69 posts

Schipol is an okay airport to have a long layover in, as there are lots of services to spend your time on. 2.5 hours is a plenty long enough layover, unless your inbound flight is seriously delayed, you should be fine. But like others said, if you fly through Frankfurt, you’d have more options.

Side note, I once missed boarding of a rhine river cruise because of major flight issues, was able to catch it on its next port of call. So not all lost.