Please sign in to post.

Is 4-5 extra hours in Florence worth a more expensive flight?

The hubby and I are deciding on May flights. We plan to start in Florence, coming from Philly. All flights have 1 stopover before we get to Florence. My question is - several (starting at $100 more expensive) tix arrive in FLR by 9:30 am that day. The other, less expensive tix arrive in FLR by 2 or 3 pm at the earliest. Is the extra 4-5 hours in the city worth it? I know we will be jet lagged, but if we really want to we could push through it. After that arrival day we will spend 2 more full days in Florence...

Somewhat related - if you do /not/ think the extra 4 hours would be worth it for us - one of the cheaper tix has a 4hr40min layover in France (Ch. De Gaulle) before getting to FLR. We are not visiting France on this trip. Would it be feasible for us to get out of the airport and see some of France before getting back for our connecting flight? We would each only have our 1 carryon backpack. It would be on a Thursday, leaving at 1pm ish local time. Thanks for your thoughts!

Posted by
1317 posts

Nonstop can also be more money before you even figure in the train costs, but could be an option. Of course, then you have to make sure your flight out is late enough in the day or go to Rome the night before or fly out from a different city.

Given the options, I'd go with the cheaper ticket and just stay in the airport. What you have time to see in Paris won't be worth the stress of missing your flight and throwing your schedule out of whack.

Posted by
1329 posts

If it were me, I would spend $100 to get to Florence in the AM. My trips are usually two weeks or less and a half a day is a lot to me. Don't worry about running out of things to do, you'll have more time to relax and have lunch or stroll around the city.

Posted by
1317 posts

Second question first. CDG is a big and busy airport and with under 5 hours, I don't think you will want to run the risk of leaving the airport.

Is Florence worth an extra $100? I would say it depends on several factors. 1) What airline? I would pay $100 extra to fly on KLM over US Airways for instance. Stopover cities could also determine this. Some people would pay extra to avoid CDG or Heathrow.

2) List out what you want to do/see in Florence. Is 2 full days plus an afternoon enough to cover everything, or would your schedule be easier with another half a day?

3) Your personal travel style/fatigue levels. Would you handle jetlag better if you arrive first thing in the morning and walk around during the day? Or do you prefer getting there in the afternoon, checking into your hotel and being able to go to bed sooner?

Posted by
56 posts

There is a mix of airlines available. Air France, Air France/Delta, US Airways/Bmi, US Airways/Lufthansa. The Bmi and Lufthansa ones are for the short in Europe connections. Besides the CDG connection, most seem to be connecting in Frankfurt.

Posted by
9110 posts

No. Here's why:

For us $200 pretty much covers a full day of being a tourist. We would not spend that amount of money for a half day.

Lots of folks wind up not spending as much time in Florence as they initially thought they would. With a bit of timing luck, you can jam it all in in one day -- two's plenty.

Regarding Paris: You'd be lucky to get into town and hour and a half after scheduled arrival at CDG. Figure two hours to get back, find gate, clear security, etc. With one hour, you could pop above ground right at Notre Dame, scurry through it, and be a nervous wreck about getting back to the airport the whole time.

Posted by
1589 posts

Hi Corey,

Have you considered the US Air Non stop from Philly to Rome?

BTW, I was born in Montgomery Hospital!

Posted by
56 posts

Hello! We decided not to visit Rome this trip as time is tight, and we don't have enough to do it justice

Posted by
1589 posts

The express train would get you to Florence in about 1 hour 40 minutes. Non stop is always less stressful and less time consuming. Just sayin' ......