Could this be the next step - or next publicity gesture? -- among airlines under attack for pollution and energy consumption?
Note that the budget carrier moved 91 million passengers last year and turned over a whopping profit.
Could this be the next step - or next publicity gesture? -- among airlines under attack for pollution and energy consumption?
Note that the budget carrier moved 91 million passengers last year and turned over a whopping profit.
EasyJet have just announced a 26% fall in pre-tax profits.
I’m not sure what you are suggesting - that people shouldn’t fly or that EasyJet shouldn’t be offsetting their emissions?
IF easyjet's numbers are correct/accurate that it can offset the carbon footprint for ~50 cents per passenger, I can see no problem with flyers being agreeable to paying that extra cost to offset the harmful affects of burning a fossil fuel