I booked a flight on BA from SFO-LHR and back for our family of 4, and later we decided to travel to Italy. We purchased a separate ticket, also on BA but not a through ticket for travel back from FCO to LHR, and then from LHR to SFO on the same day. We have 4 hours and 10 minutes between the flights. We will be carrying on international sized bags only, no checked bags and will have our boarding passes printed for the flight to SFO.
With the recent terrorist attacks in the UK, BA is offering to reschedule at no charge some flights, and we qualify. We could leave a day later and come back a day later. This would mean we could take our flight as planned from FCO to LHR, but then not leave for SFO until the next day. But this would also mean one less day in London on the front end. We only have 3 nights, 2 full days as of now.
Pros would be that we would be less worried about our flight home, cons would be that we would have to arrange new hotel, change our plans on both the front and back end and have only 2 nights in London, but a day on the back end to visit Windsor castle or something close to LHR. We also have to leave the airport and come back the next day and go through the process again.
As an aside, my husband is a US pilot so if we get stuck we can always fly standby home. Not optimal, but a backup. I called BA and they said they would give us a credit if we call before we actually miss the flight, but that would be worthless probably as the tickets would cost more than the credit. We do have travel insurance, but they require a delay of 5 hours to pay out for missed connection. We'd probably be just best off flying standby.
As seasoned travelers who know best, would you change the itinerary, or leave it alone? I understand that if we have carry ons only, boarding passes in hand, we should be fine to go right to our next flight. Is this accurate?
It is more of if something mechanical happens or the flight is cancelled, or a very long delay, etc. that we would miss our flight.
thanks so much in advance.