Please sign in to post.

Aer Lingus Reviews Autumn 2024

I just flew Aer LIngus for the first time in six decades of traveling. It was a reasonable cost flight for two, round-trip from Washington (IAD) to Faro (FAO) in economy class.

The ground staff were universally friendly and compassionate, though they played with the queuing process rather amusingly. The aircraft were clean and appeared to be well maintained.

Schedule was not a priority and three of the four flights were delayed at boarding with exactly zero information provided to passengers each time.

Two of the flights arrived early, but were both delayed by a lack of gate preparation at Dublin, leading to actual net delays in disembarking from the aircraft. In both cases, this meant a crowded rush to disembark by a lot of anxious passengers, that was met by a closed cabin door and long periods of people, many rather expansive in girth, crammed in the aisle but not moving for a long period.

In-flight trans-Atlantic service featured a tasty dinner/lunch entrée each time.

Otherwise, the inflight service could best be described as abysmal, negligent, and lethargic. Water, a key requirement of an 8 hour flight, was virtually unobtainable, except by begging from a single flight attendant busy on their phone in the galley while their colleagues slept in the last row. Beverage service was offered twice during 8 hours, the first just prior to the meal, the second time exclusively coffee or tea - no water or other beverages. Flying east, there was one meal, flying west a tiny sandwich and a cookie were offered, prior to landing without beverage. Departing IAD, I was amused by the passenger in front of me who brought a pizza on-board, but now I get it.

An interesting engineering aspect of the A321 aircraft seating is the provided headsets plug directly into the screen. This means, if the window seat passenger needs to stand, the other two passengers must stop whatever they are watching on the touch screen and then physically disconnect their headsets. I am guessing the standard armrest headset connection must have interfered with the aforementioned girth or something. For whatever reason, it's not a great design.

Another interesting design is the economy lavatory hidden behind a flight attendant seat in the galley. As I am 76 inches/193cm I could really only use that hidden lavatory as the two others had very low, curved overheads. Think of them as Cirque du Soleil contortionist lavatories.

My A321 seat was hard and uncomfortable, as if the pad had been worn thin and hard through long use by large people. I tried sitting on one of the provided pillows, but that wasn't much help. At a not insignificant extra cost, I had upgraded to an exit row, so I did have reasonable legroom on the IAD=DUB and DUB=IAD legs. The normal seats on the DUB-FAO legs were the normal, steerage seat pitch, compounded by the entertainment device boxes occupying the legroom under every seat.

Lastly, virtually all of the folks on the DUB-FAO leg (Full A330 both directions) were traveling on UK passports. Since Brexit, this means the non-EU passport queues are very, very, badly overwhelmed. Passport control wait times arriving and leaving (U.S. Passport) were on the order of 90 minutes arriving and 60 minutes departing. As Ryan Air and Aer Lingus are very significant carriers at FAO, it behooves them to engage the FAO airport to do something about this - such as subsidizing physical and personnel improvements. Brexit has its costs that should be payed by those responsible.

Finally, were I not a water-dependent mammal, had I slept the entire flight, and also perhaps were I not taller than average, I believe the flight would have been tolerable. Alas, I am, I didn't and I am, so it wasn't.

I am looking for any suggestion for comfortable, reasonable media of travel from IAD to FAO. My next try will likely be direct flight to Lisbon and driving the balance. That gives a better array of airlines and the elimination of changing planes.

Posted by
2 posts

Circling-back to compare to two other transatlantic flights I have taken in 2024: TAP IAD/FAO/IAD - Check-in staff chatted amongst themselves for 20 minutes after the posted opening of check-in before checking anyone in. They were extremely strict on all weights, especially carry-on, requiring checking my European spec roll-on case. Their A321 aircraft has virtually no overhead storage and the seat pitch has to be among the shortest in the industry. Otherwise, the service was consistent, bottled water was copiously available throughout the flight, and, unlike Aer Lingus, I did not see 2/3 of the flight attendant crew asleep in the back of the aircraft.

British Airways & KLM IAD/AMS/IAD - BA check in to London LHR went very smoothly. Seat was comfortable, with a paid upgrade to premium economy. Food and beverage service were as expected, with beverages readily available throughout the flight. KLM from LHR to AMS was as expected with a quick beverage available. KLM charged $200 for a small cabin pet AMS to IAD and were very strict about keeping it under the seat on the cold floor, but otherwise the premium economy seat was comfortable, beverages were readily available, and the food/beverage service were excellent with two full meals provided.

On none of these flights did I feel as neglected as I did on Aer Lingus, nor did I feel the seat cushion had been worn thin to where I could feel the metal structure of the seat as I did on the four Aer Lingus flight legs.

Posted by
1 posts

Also had poor service in September. Had paid Dexter for exit row and they changed me to regular and told me I would get a refund. Due to to my height , flight were extremely poor; now November and no refund despite numerous phone calls.

Steve Breen

Posted by
799 posts

We flew Aer Lingus economy on our first two overseas trips in 2015 and 2017. Personnel and service were warm, friendly and excellent but second trip on newer Airbus planes was definitely more uncomfortable. Very thin seat padding, and entertainment boxes took up a lot of room. Our next trip in 2019 was United premium economy and I’ll never go back to steerage for long flights. Clearing U.S. entry in Dublin was a big plus, but I can’t see using Aer Lingus seven years later in today’s era of diminishing service.

Posted by
51 posts

Aer Lingus is like so meny low-cost carriers: they cut costs with thinner seat padding, lower seat pitch, etc.

I'm tall (6'4"/193cm) and most economy seat pitch doesn't work for me on flights longer than 2-3 hours. I'm also lean (cyclist build) so there's not a lot of butt padding on me and thinly padded (with low quality padding, I should clarify) seats get excruciatingly uncomfortable after a short while. "Dead butt" is no fun at all.

So I save up for or exchange status points for a minimum of premium economy for international flights, if only for the leg room. Whenever possible I'll go for business class or first class, which are a lot more comfortable albeit tougher on a budget most times.

And I'll avoid the low-cost carriers - full stop. It's not worth the discomfort.

That said: not offering multiple water services is unconscionable on long-haul flights. While I make it a point to bring a bottle of water (or two) with me even on short-hop flights, I shouldn't have to rely solely on that to keep hydrated.

I think the direct to Lisbon with driving (or, better yet, transit) might be a better option, for sure. Either that or to any hub city for one of the major international carrier alliances (e.g. SkyTeam, Star Alliance, OneWorld) and connect from there to Faro.