Please sign in to post.

A warning to anyone in Washington state applying for Global Entry: Follow-Up

You may remember my earlier post on this subject, but if not, here's a quick summary:

I applied for Global Entry back in May and was asked if I used marijuana. I replied in the affirmative and was told at that time my application would have to go in front of an arbiter and would probably be denied along with a forfeiture of my filing fees.

Today, I found out the results:

I was APPROVED.

I'm totally shocked, as I was expecting a rejection notice when I logged into the Trusted Traveler website. However, I now have a TT/GE number and am one of the club!

I guess honesty does pay in the end. Thanks for all the support from the wonderful people in this forum.

-- Mike Beebe

Posted by
2001 posts

Wow, honesty being rewarded. That is great news. Thanks for following up.

Posted by
3522 posts

Appreciate the follow up.

Maybe all of our government isn't mindless drones after all. :-)

Posted by
4656 posts

I read your original post. Around the same time I was visiting a friend in San Francisco (CA being another liberal state). We were discussing the value of Global Entry. I have had the Cdn NEXUS card for some years, she has not applied for GE yet. I mentioned your post and concerns (more for her son's benefit than hers). She worked in the US Foreign Service for decades and was accepted back in the 70s despite an honest 'yes' to the same question on her application. So perhaps the arbiter actually has common sense and the original warning was just a conservative word to the wise.

Posted by
14979 posts

Bravo! Maybe they viewed this as a "folly of youth."

Since I am not interested in the Global Entry program for myself at all, I won't have to answer such a question, even though given my age and birthplace, they might find my answer not credible.

Posted by
2252 posts

Welcome to "the Club", as you put it! Thank you for the update and I am happy to hear honesty really does pay off.

Posted by
4602 posts

If they have any sense, which would be a real surprise in most govt agencies, they have to take into account that it's legal in some states. I would think they would be more interested in those who lied about it and then it showed up on their police background check. I recently applied for Global Entry and don't remember that question being on the application.

Posted by
2787 posts

You were lucky that your application did not end up in front of an arbiter who was recently appointed. I live in Washington State and will be applying for a GE card as soon as my PC card expires. I wish I would have gotten a GE card in the beginning but I tried to "cheap-out" when I first applied.

Posted by
8967 posts

I would think they would be more interested in those who lied about it and then it showed up on their police background check.

I assume that is exactly why they asked.

Posted by
1 posts

Just as a warning, I had the same exact experience at Sea Tac and answered the marijuana question honestly (that I use occasionally since moving to a legal state) and was denied. My denial letter stated I was denied solely due to marijuana use.

Posted by
2916 posts

My denial letter stated I was denied solely due to marijuana use.

Bad luck. Maybe it was just a matter of getting a different person making the decision.

Posted by
2252 posts

I, too, live in a "legal" state (Colorado). The problem is Global Entry is a federal matter and not state.