Please sign in to post.

RS Tour vs Independent Travel: No clear winner for me

Prefacing this to acknowledge everyone is different and wants different things from their travel experiences. However, having done 3 RS tours with independent travel tacked on the front and back ends (most recently in 2024) and having just completed an independent 20 day trip, I tried to compare our very specific experiences to see whether there was a clear winner. I was surprised by how different factors favored each approach and am curious about experiences of others who have traveled both ways recently.

Transportation: we chose to travel by train, supplementing this with day tours or private guides/drivers to out of the way locations. Winner: RS tours. Huge time savings with door to door transportation. No extra time necessary to walk to and from train stations, wait for trains, etc.

Hotels: We chose small centrally located hotels or B&Bs as well as one larger centrally located hotel. Mid range places with excellent reviews. Winner: independent travel. Our rooms were consistently updated, roomy, extremely comfortable. We experienced little extras like a plate of fresh fruit and pastries waiting for us. Breakfasts were excellent, as were the staff. These hotels all met the “small centrally located hotel” criteria for RS hotels, but were hands down nicer, more comfortable and welcoming environments in which to relax with a comfy robe and cup of tea at the end of a busy day of sightseeing.

Guides: we hired private guides for city walking tours and several excursions, and took a few small group day tours. Winner (by a nose): RS tours. I’ve found the local guides on RS tours to be consistently excellent. All of our private guides were excellent, but I found 2 of the small group tours somewhat disappointing.

Cost: Winner: independent travel. For about the same price as a RS tour we stayed in nicer hotels and ate in nicer restaurants. Our costs would have been much lower than an RS tour had we chosen to stay and eat in places comparable to the tours.

Flexibility: This is a tough one and kind of a draw. We chose the specific locations and activities we wanted, and if we were at a museum or on a hike we didn’t have to leave sooner than we’d have liked to in order to stay with the group. We mixed in 3 and 4 night stays with a few 2 night stays and a 4 night stay mid trip gave us more time to relax. However. RS Tours are more able to pivot to accommodate bad weather or crowds (sometimes changing the order of the daily schedule or easily substituting an alternative activity). We were forced to book excursions in advance, so when we had a bad weather day we couldn’t shift those excursions to a different day. On the whole we were more flexible but there were a couple of times we were stuck (and probably would have been less so had we chosen to drive rather than travel by train).

Food: independent travel. We had a number of excellent meals and didn’t pay more overall than we would have on an RS tour. We’ve often had very good meals on tour, but we had excellent meals on our own.

Overall experience in a group vs traveling as a couple: A conclusive “it depends.” We’ve had amazing RS tour mates who enhanced our trip — several of whom have become great friends we see as often as we are able. However our 3rd tour group never gelled, and spending so much time with them probably detracted a tiny bit from our overall experience. On 2 of our 3 RS tours one person got sick and then many more came down with the same thing— so much time spent together on the bus and at meals. Traveling independently, even with train travel, we both stayed healthy throughout the trip and after. Luck of the draw?

What’s your experience comparing recent travel?

Posted by
9428 posts

Quite honestly, this question is a hot button topic for some people and they are quite passionate in their answers. I've followed this forum long enough that I can pretty much predict the types of answers you are going to get.... I like that you have experienced both types of travel and are doing your best to be objective on your comparisons. I'm also not terribly surprised that there was no clear winner.

There are many ways to travel and often what might be best for one trip or one individual is going to be different for the next trip or individual. I like to keep an open mind and explore multiple possibilities. There isn't a right way/wrong way or even a "best" way to travel. There is just travel.

So many different things can be a catalyst for the next trip. A bargain to a place I've always wanted to go is always likely to get me moving on planning! An experience from childhood that really made an impression can lead to a trip. A friend wanting to travel. A big event, a family reunion, a special celebration, and the list goes on and on. Get inspiration and get going. It really doesn't matter how you go as long as it meets your needs.

I solo travel, I independently travel, I travel with friends, I travel with family, I take tours and I take cruises. I enjoy them all. Really, I am happy to just go and explore!

Posted by
3669 posts

Adding on to Carol’s response, I think travel preferences can evolve too. I did my first multi-day tour (3 days) last month and enjoyed it a lot more than I thought I would. So, I’m considering even longer tours for future travel.

I think it’s important to get out there and try new things. I think it was carol who made a comment on a thread about tours awhile back about not knocking tours until you try it. That sort of stuck with me. I’m not a social person, but maybe I could go on a 2-week group tour and have a good time. I’m signed up for the my way alps tour next year and am looking forward to it. We’ll see if I survive it. :-)

Posted by
550 posts

Carol has good comments.

There isn't a right way/wrong way or even a "best" way to travel. There is just travel.
So many different things can be a catalyst for the next trip.

Our last trip to Europe was to Italy. RS tour, self-guided cycle tour and independent travel. Our TR is at https://community.ricksteves.com/travel-forum/trip-reports/southern-italy-30-days-three-ways-to-travel

Our NEXT trip is also a 30 day trip ... 14 days in Germany; 16 in France. We will spend 15 or 16 of these days cycling; with added on dates to the cycle tours in Strasbourg and Dijon, 18 days will be self-guided cycle tour and connected; 12 days will be independent travel. So, perhaps you might say we prefer self-guided cycle tours, but I really don't think that is necessarily so.

Each mode of travel has its own merit, so its a little hard to say which is best, as our TR from last year notes...

  • I can’t say that any one mode of travel was “better” than any other. I will observe that my wife quite liked the ease of the RS tour, and we both felt great about our RS guide.

  • We generally loved the bike tour, except for the last day, 'the day from hell.'

  • As for the last part of our trip, the freedom of driving from Lecce to Naples was great in terms of freedom of movement and schedule, and stressful in terms of driving in Italy … Our 4 nights/3 days in Naples with no car, but with day trips to Pompeii and Ischia, were fantastic and exhausting.

  • RS was the most expensive, per diem. Puglia Self Guided Bike tour with the hotels they added onto our time in Puglia was the least expensive.

LATE ADDITION. Self guided cycling is the most “through the back door” style. You run into folks along the way who find your cycling through their village, town, city, or farmland to be a great reason to strike up an exchange. You’re on the road and not spending multiple days in one large city with many visitors/tourists. Self guided means my wife and I are not embedded with a large group of North Americans. We’re on our own, for better or worse.

LATE ADDITION 2 -The RS Sicily Tour also had three great specialty guides - in Palermo, Agrigento and at Taormino, where we were enthralled by a volcanologist from the University in Catania, Boris Behnke, hours after we were astride Mt Etna watching it blowing smoke rings.

Posted by
37 posts

Carrie is correct in that travel choices evolve. My husband and I travel independently in Italy because we've done it many times before and we are comfortable doing so. We rent an apartment and use it as a home base. We took a RS tour in 2022 and enjoyed it, but as we are getting older we find that constant packing and unpacking is something that we don't like. We discovered that we like cruises because we only unpack once; we may not have the in-depth sightseeing experience of a tour or independent travel, but we don't worry about leaving things behind or missing the bus.

Posted by
8624 posts

Interesting topic, Ruth! I prefer both, depending on the itinerary. I am currently considering either the RS Prague/Budapest or maybe the Loire/south France tour for next year. But, I will also be planning an independent trip. France might evolve into an independent trip, instead, since I’ve already been to some of those cities.

Here’s how I would rate them:

RS tour is better:
-”Social interactions” - being with a group is fun!

-”Ease” -the carefree feeling about the next day (no concern about logistics)

-”Itineraries where trains aren’t easy”. One of my main reasons for RS tours.

-”Guides” - a very nice experience from all of the RS guides & city guides!

Independent travel is better:
-”Flexibility”. Huge winner here. I can & have switched locations during trips when I wanted for a variety of reasons. Also, huge flexibility of the entire day. If I decide to sleep in (rarely do), there’s no schedule or person I need to notify. I can stay in museums for hours, or leave after 15 minutes; I’ve done both! I rarely have any need to look at my watch.

-”Lodging” - a clear winner. I stay in wonderful, unique B&B’s or little hotels - ones that would be too small for a tour group. Many of my choices are very memorable! Only a few of the RS ones readily come to mind as comparisons except the Cinque Terre (lovely view!), the Paris (so charming!), and a few on the GAS tour (alpine beauties!).

-”Transportation” -my definition is how little time can I be on transportation divided by the number of days. I don’t want it to be more than an average of 1 hr/day. I realize RS tours aren’t going to just cover a small portion of a country where independently I can be at the next location enjoying it by 10:00am. so this becomes a clear winner.

-”Activities” - RS tours has the unfair disadvantage because with independent trips, I tailor the activities to my hobbies, curiosity, and something new I want to learn after researching. Plus, I love the festivals! But, that’s not to say the RS tours haven’t been enjoyable, too.

Interactions with locals” - this happens so much traveling independently. To be as impartial as possible, I will compare the days on the Adriatic tour with my one night away from that tour when I went over to Hvar Island, instead. It surprised me how much I had someone talking to me, or I initiated the conversation during my time away from the tour. I’m not sure if I became more approachable away from the tour for that one day, seemed more independent or what, but it was noticeable for me.

-”Cost” - easily the winner.

Posted by
59 posts

We loved our only RS tour (so far)…11 days Paris & HOF. My husband doesn’t enjoy driving in foreign countries…”put me on a bus and tell me what time to show up” seems like a true vacation for him. And how lovely for someone else to do all the research for you and have your museum tickets and private guides all arranged. And we had experiences that we would never have been able to arrange on our own…a wine and cheese tasting under an ancient tree followed by a picnic that we had gathered from the morning street market comes to mind. An overnight on MSM with a private dinner and early morning tour for another.

I also think you have to consider a tour more than a way to get from one place to another. The RS guides share so much info while you are on the bus or walking tour, both regarding the history and significance of what you are going to see, as well as insights into the culture and traditions. It’s priceless to “hang with a local” in any country you visit.
I agree sometimes independent travel can be lovely as well (for instance in a large city like London or Rome.) Or if you simply don’t have 10 days to spend in one country. I wouldn’t rule out either mode of travel…just depends on the trip!

Posted by
227 posts

It truly is a matter of personal preference and there is no right answer. Even in the same category, we get different "results."

Transportation: the train (supplemented by taxi, ride shares or private transfer as needed) is the HANDS DOWN winner for me for two reasons:

  1. I hate traveling by bus because I get motion sickness.

  2. I don't go to Europe to spend my time with other Americans on the bus all day (no offense!). Traveling on the train is a way of mingling with the locals and absorbing their language and customs. It is also the more authentic experience - that is how the locals travel so that is good enough for me. And I've often ended up having interesting conversations with people on the trains who are interested to meet an American and glad to practice their English while I am happy to practice my French.

Interaction with locals: See #2 above.

Guides: my personal preference is pretty strong, I truly dislike being part of a guided tour group. I want to wander at my own pace, and read the information in a guidebook. I rarely join a guided tour anywhere in Europe and the times I have I've spent alternately shifting from foot to foot wishing we could move along OR deeply engrossed in something and being rushed along. Not for me.

Flexibility: 100% goes with DIY. Again, I don't want to travel en masse from Site A to Site B, and eat in the pre-chosen restaurants and stay in the pre-chosen hotels. Some people might like that kind of "security," while I find it inhibiting.

I want to add that I've traveled a lot in Europe, but it has all been in Western Europe and the UK where I am more or less in my comfort zone culturally and linguistically. I might feel differently in a more "exotic" locale.

Posted by
23182 posts

Jean, if you to the RS Prague / Budapest tour, do it primarily for the social sturcture of the tour. Thats very legitimate. Dont do it primarily for the cultural aspect or with the expectation of getting the most out of the locations you reach. Its just too short for that, and if you are going to extend it, then you end up with repitition and a loss of the efficiency of the RS tour.

Posted by
5199 posts

The social aspect of an RS tour is something that my wife raved about, but sometimes drove me bananas. She loved the evening group meals, as she put it, a vacation from her vacation with me. I on the other hand don't like to be stuck for 2-3 hours at a meal and couldn't wait to escape. On the bright side, because she had 26 new friends on our tour I didn't feel guilty leaving the meal early and she probably never noticed.

The post reminded me of one I wrote in 2019 when I was a newbie on the forum. Here's an excerpt, it also includes a comparison with cruising.

Do I have a preferred travel method? No. It depends on where we’re
going, what we want to do and what we want to see. Cruising; unpack
once, put your wallet away, multi destinations, lowest price of the 3.
Downside for us, not enough time in each destination and no evenings
in port on the trips we were on. On our own; advantage is seeing what
you want, how you want and for as long as you want. Disadvantage,
planning is all up to you, everything is an out of wallet expense, day
trips or renting a car may be intimidating if not used to it. Group
Tours; I can’t compare all tour companies but on an RS tour there is a
good mix of scheduled sites and on your own time, see places I
probably wouldn’t see on my own, and outstanding cultural experiences
I wouldn’t get on my own. Disadvantages, it’s the priciest-especially
as a Canadian, once you convert an RS tour from $American to $Canadian
(x 1.35 at the moment) it can get really pricey (but worth it),
limited time in some spots.

Bottom line for me is that there is a place for all methods, it depends on what we want to get out of it.

Posted by
4938 posts

My favorite thing about tours? They take me to places and experiences that I really enjoyed that I would never have done on my own.

Posted by
453 posts

Think it really depends on the individual and what they wish to gain out of their travel experience. Tours offer efficiency to see more in less time, and make transportation considerations (getting from Point-A to Point-B) mostly stress-free. The 'blank canvas' of independent travel allows flexibility to be where you want, when you want, and for however long you want. And in most circumstances, independent travel is more budget friendly.

That said, we have found the right recipe is to incorporate both. We have taken three RSE Tours, each time adding days ahead of, and following, the tour/s proper. Our fourth tour is scheduled for next year, where we'll lead into 'Berlin, Prague and Vienna' with a few days in Amsterdam and spend a week in Budapest following (Vienna) final-night dinner. Like the three before it, the core of this trip will have benefit of knowledgable guides and transportation between geographically-distanced places, but will also have an independent element while in bookend cities. Such a schedule also helps, we find, with acclimating to time zones and jet lag before structured (tour) go-go-go, and winding down afterwards before heading home. Good travels!

Posted by
279 posts

I sometimes enjoy the group meals when traveling with a group. But, I don't really like lingering at the table longer than an hour if everyone is talking about things that don't interest me. I can talk about art and food with the best of them but some other topics like clothes, sports, opera, and marathon times aren't of much interest to me. But to be honest learning about others travel nightmares is always fascinating. I love those travel war stories and can tell a few myself.

Posted by
1825 posts

I know for a fact that I would hate any tour or cruise, so I've never done either. Well, except for an art tour in Italy with a school friend and a bunch of grown-ups when I was a teenager --- basically just being driven from one place to the next for a week and then left to look at art on our own. That was great at the time, but I'm not sure I would even like the exact same tour now --- there wouldn't be enough bathroom breaks for an old lady, for instance!

Posted by
5906 posts

Transportation: for some countries, this was an overwhelming factor in favor of a tour, that toppled all my other DIY preferences.

The countries and towns I wanted to visit were not well connected by trains; buses did not always run to schedule; routes were not ideal; point to point routes were not always available, requiring backtracking through a major hub. I had no desire to rent a car and didn't prefer to hire drivers(s.)

The tour went almost exactly where I wanted to go and I sat back and enjoyed letting someone else figure it out.

Posted by
259 posts

There is no right answer. We have travelled independently on most of our trips. I have used tours as a guide for some of our trips, but like the freedom of traveling on our own. We do not enjoy group dinners and the mindless small talk. We sometimes miss things that a guide would provide.

Our trips to Africa was organized as well as our trip to mainland China. I would not do either any other way.

We did a self driving tour of New Zealand. The route and accommodation was planned. In some ways the best of both worlds.

Our last trip was a cruise. Not a good way to see a region (a few hours in a port) but it was easy as accommodations and food were easy.

As we age I find our travel process change.

Do what you want. The dollar cost becomes meaningless in my opinion if you do not enjoy your travel.

Posted by
23182 posts

CW sort of my take on it too.

As time goes by I get more and more like this. Do lots of research (for me that just being awake) and turn over the likes and dislikes to a good trip planner with experience in the region. When done well, its 75% my idea and 25% things and ideas you just cant find on the internet or a guide book ... thanks to the experience of the trip planner.

Posted by
1515 posts

I agree with Bob there’s no right answer. There are plus and minuses to all ways of travel. You just need to decide which way suits you. What I think most people are passionate about on here is being able to travel, no matter which way you do it.

Posted by
1356 posts

I like to take a tour my first time in a country for an overview and to get into popular sites with a group. Then I go back (or add days) to see/do what the tour didn't cover and to return to or spend more time at favorite places. I also like meeting people on tours and have made lasting friendships. I did eight days in the Netherlands on my own this spring as I wanted a lot of time in art museums. It was my first time in the Netherlands and I did it independently as none of the tours I looked at provided the itinerary I wanted. I missed having a traveling companion to talk to, the first time I've had that feeling in spite of many other independent trips in other countries.

Posted by
3144 posts

I haven’t taken a multi day tour but know lots of people who have. I think one big difference is that independent travel takes a lot of planning and research. Now I enjoy it a lot but not everyone has the time or inclination. In fact, that is one of the major advantages of tours that the people I know cite.

Posted by
126 posts

We often do a mix of independent travel and Rick Steves'. Last year, we did the Romantic Road for a week before joining the Munich, Salzburg, Vienna trip.

Pros of independent travel:
- You may get to drive in a different country – autobahn, for instance!
- Your free to roam around all the time – e.g. London with the subway system, or enjoying more days at the sea in the Algarve.
- More control of your itinerary – I prefer spending more time than just 2 or 3 nights in some places.
- Flexibility.
- Cheaper, better hotels, better meals (for the most part - usually the first and the last Rick Steves meals, and the meal with the family are great).

Pros of Rick Steves’ travel:
- We go to places we wouldn’t go and love them.
- No-stress traveling – just follow the group.
- Amazing guides and experiences in all the places – hiring your own guide or tour is a hit or miss, and mostly a miss.
- A guide for your whole trip can help you better when trying to find things to do in our free time.

My wife was saying this week that she didn’t care one way or another, she loved all our travels. Except I’m the one who plans everything and tells her what to do, so it’s like a guided tour for her either way :) Not so much for me.

Posted by
5906 posts

Except I’m the one who plans everything and tells her what to do, so it’s like a guided tour for her either way :) Not so much for me.

This is why I prefer tours with some of my travel friends. I enjoy being my own tour guide, but I don't want to be their tour guide. I love being responsible for my own vacation; I don't want to be responsible for their vacation.