Please sign in to post.

Seeing more vs. staying put

hey guys. What are your feelings on traveling to more places vs. fewer with more time at each point? It's seeing the big sights vs. spending some time to get to know a place. More specifically, I'm trying to decide where to spend a week in France on a tight budget. Will probably be couch surfing and eating the sandwiches from the boulangerie. Note: will be going to Paris after that week's up.
PS I have gone through the Rick Steve's France book. Would like to see Provence/French Riviera. Any ballpark figures for how much one spends for a week there? Thanks!

Posted by
23626 posts

Of course, I do think you see more if you stay put. Our first trip, same as many first timers, was a blur of big cities and old buildings. Had to look at the photos to remember where we had been. Now we see a lot more by seeing less.

Posted by
11507 posts

This is simple, tight budget=more staying put,, each time you move you spent money on the actual travel..money you could spend on wine,,what a waste ha ha. Seriously, a week is one or two destinations tops to me. Have you priced out hostels? For French Riviera look at staying at Nice and doing daytrips to other cities,,Cannes, Monte Carlo, Eze, Antibes etc etc.. I have been looking at train fares for Paris -Nice if you buy well in advance they can be as cheap as 35-40 euros..not bad city center to city center.

Posted by
638 posts

TC, a great way to get a clear answer to your question is read the posts where people ask to have their itinerary scrutinized.

Posted by
3050 posts

The French Riveria can get pretty expensive, not just with lodging but with food. I think the best way to save money would be to rent an apartment in an area you'd like to explore. On the western -ish side of things, you could rent an apartment in Cassis and that means you're convenient to day trips in Marsielle and Aix-En-Provence. Or you could rent an apartment in Nice and go all the places people listed above. But a week apartment rental will certainly be cheaper than a hotel, and you can cook your own breakfasts and dinners and it's easier to do the picnic thing when you have your own fridge and a place to store food from the supermarket.

Posted by
10629 posts

You say you will probably couch surf, so that takes care of housing. You can find inexpensive food anywhere you go, even on the Riviera. There are a tiny family run restaurants, sandwich shops or little supermarkets. Look for kabobs, falafels, etc. My sons would say you haven't lived until you've survived on merguez sandwiches in a baguette, topped with overflowing french fries. The food stands are very popular.

Posted by
2829 posts

Staying put will usaully save you money, because you get to know where to eat on the cheap, and regardless of strategy used to travel, it will always cost you something more than staying in the same place. Just a friendly hint: as a person with many Couchsurf contacts (from meetings, not hosting/surfing), and having had an ex-girlfriend who's very involved in the project, just beware Couchsurfing might be more expensive than your average hostel if you don't want to be a freeloader. Google the terms freeloader + Couchsurfing and you will understand what I am talking about..

Posted by
818 posts

I get railed all the time for my itineraries - but I like to be on the move. Last year we did a 4 day trip to Belgium and stayed in three cities. I have done the same with weekend trips to The Netherlands. I don't mind waking up, grabbing my bag and jumping on a train to my next destination - I like the adventure of it and we try to pack three bags with our first two days in the first bag, second two days in second bag - that kind of thing. Me - personally, I'd spend the week hitting a few cities, staying in B&Bs or a hostels.