My husband and I are working on our itinerary for our first trip to Europe in May for two weeks, including time in Heidelberg visiting family. We created itinerary #1 but then worried that we weren't spending enough time in each city, so dropped Prague due to distance and created #2 (below). Now looking at both, we are wondering if #1 would allow us ample time to see the highlights of each city or not. We hate to cut Prague if we don't have to. Do you think we are too ambitious with #1? We are a young couple; long days & lots of walking shouldn't be a problem.
ITINERARY #1
Day1 - arrive Frankfurt am, train to Heidelberg,
Day2 - train to Munich am (arrive ~1200),
Day3 - Munich,
Day4 - to Salzburg afternoon (arrive ~1400),
Day5 - Salzburg,
Day6 - Salzburg,
Day7 - train to Prague early am (8hr arrive 1500),
Day8 - Prague,
Day9 - train to Heidelberg (8hr train - arrive 1600),
Day10 - to Paris early am (arrive by 1100),
Day11 - Paris,
Day12 - Paris - late evening train to Heidelberg,
Day13 - Heidelberg & surrounding area,
Day14 - Depart.
ITINERARY #2
Day1 - arrive Frankfurt am, train to Heidelberg,
Day2 - train to Munich am,
Day3 - Munich,
Day4 - Munich,
Day5 - am train to Salzburg,
Day6 - Salzburg,
Day7 - Salzburg - evening train to Heidelberg,
Day8 - Heidelberg,
Day9 - am train to Paris,
Day10 - Paris,
Day11 - Paris,
Day12 - to Heidelberg pm,
Day13 - Heidelberg & surrounding area,
Day14 - Depart.