Please sign in to post.

Review our England itinerary plus help w/Warwick - yay or nay

Hi ETBDers! Our family of four has a 21 night England trip planned for next July. We are mom/dad + 11 & 8 yr old girls. Parents have been to Italy & London/Bath before, plus a ETBD Best of Europe tour. This is the first time over the pond for the kids. We will be renting apts. to have a kitchen and washer/dryer. We want to go by train instead of renting a car. Here's what I have so far: Overnight IAD-LHR Train to Bath (seems faster than taking the bus, but let me know)
4 nights Bath: Roman Baths, governor's walking tour, full day Mad Max Stonhenge/Avebury/Castle Combe tour, free day to pick from additional Bath sights plus time to recover from jetlag Here's what I need help with: (See part 2 - sorry long post!)

Posted by
26 posts

After Bath we could take the train to Warwick to spend 1 night and see the castle and then have 3 nights in York. Or we could skip Warwick and have 4 nights in York (new to everyone in the family). York sights we want to do: Train museum, Viking Ctr, Cathedral, old town, plus maybe go to the coast and/or the Moors for a day (recommendations for best coast city?) Then we will be in London for 12 nights w/an apt. near High St. Kensington tube. I will list our desired sights to see if Warwick Castle would be duplicating the other sites we're seeing. London definite: Tower, British Museum, Science Museum, Windsor Castle, Legoland, Harry Potter Studio, Hampton Court, Globe, Tate Modern, St Paul's Cathedral, Churchill War Rooms, Westminster Abbey, London Eye (must do on the kids' list), Free time for parks/shopping/rest. Other possible London sites: Kew, History/V&A Museums We thought about Edinburgh for this trip, but it didn't interest us as much as the other sites we have planned. Similarly, we don't have many 'country' days planned b/c our 'wow' nature sites run more along the Alps, Rockies, beach, Italian coast, etc. vs. the bucolic Great Britain scenery. Thanks for any tips/advice!!

Posted by
452 posts

If you do go to Warwick it is a very easy day trip from London. I wouldn't get involved in just arranging one overnight there with all the logistics involved, better to add the overnight to London. I went to Warwick Castle a couple of years ago on a London Walks Explorer Day which they combined with Stratford on Avon. As you probably know it is owned by the same outfit that owns Madame Tussauds and is increasingly commercial. After you pay the basic entry fee there are further add on fees if you want to visit some of the other parts of the Castle. I guess the precise information is all on the website. I didn't love Warwick Castle, it was OK but I wont be planning on going again. But many others really like it. + I believe there are often lots of activities planned that suit children, especially in the summer - check their website.
Personally, I think Hampton Court Palace is much more interesting (and it also has activities suitable for children especially the kitchens). You could also think about travelling part of the way there or back using the river boat (say Hampton Court to Richmond on the way back) - using the river boat for the whole trip takes hours.

Posted by
377 posts

We visited Warwick Castle in 2004 with our boys and enjoyed walking around the castle walls, especially as there was an orchestra practicing for a concert that evening so our walk was serenaded all the way. I do agree that parts are rather commercial (like cut-rate Disney), but it was nice as part of a day that included Stratford . I don't think I would devote a whole day to it.

Posted by
9110 posts

Warwick Castle's a carnival. My kids thought it sucked. Wife II likes the town for the antique jewelry shops. The town has a statue of a dead boxer or wrestler. Not much else to say about it.

Posted by
26 posts

I had read about the commercial aspect of Warwick, so that was part of my hesitation. I didn't want to go into castle overload either, since we will also be seeing the White Tower, Windsor & Hampton Ct., not to mention all the churches. But I did think it would be nice to see a castle in a more rural setting as well. Good suggestion to do it as a day trip from London. We're going to try and stay flexible on what we do when, so we can put that in our maybe pile. Any further suggestions on day trips from York? Is 4 nights there overdoing it? (but our bare minimum stay is 3 nts - just not too fond of the 1-2 nt stays)

Posted by
51 posts

In Warwick you can also (usually) climb the tower of St. Mary's Church, which has very good views of the town and the castle from the top. Inside the church you can also do brass rubbing, and visit the crypt where the Earls of Warwick were traditionally buried. Warwick itself is quite small, and has a compact semi-pedestrianised town centre. There are some interesting shops and restaurants there, as well as a small town museum (last time I went it was free entry - but that was 5 or so years ago). It's also easy to get to Stratford-upon-Avon from Warwick - either by train or bus. There have been some archaeological digs at the Shakespeare house recently (my mother has been involved as a volunteer) and I know that people have been to see the dig / volunteered to participate (including an American professor from Oregon I think). Warwick is also contiguous with the town of Leamington, which is far less touristy that Warwick, but is bigger. Leamington grew as a Spa town in the 19th Century and has some pretty Regency buildings, as well as the restored Pump Rooms, which has a small museum in showing the Spa Baths as they were in the 19th Century. Whether or not you want to visit Warwick Castle comes down to whether or not you want to go somewhere that is rather commercialised, but is different to other castles in its content. You can easily spend several hours there, but as other posters have pointed out, there are extra charges for some of the sights (the Ghost Tower is one I think). Otherwise, you could do a trip to Warwick etc without the castle, but personally, I'd go to York.

Posted by
51 posts

Hm, the first part of my post wasn't posted. Gremlins probably. You can also go to Kenilworth for a different castle experience - Kenilworth Castle is ruined, but quite striking. Its also far cheaper (but also far less developed as a tourist site) than Warwick Castle. You can get to Kenilworth easily from Warwick or Leamington. Any questions about Warwick, feel free to send me a message - I live around 1 mile from Warwick Castle so I know the town pretty well.

Posted by
11507 posts

All kids are different, glad my kids have never found anything in Europe to "suck" as they are not jaded world travellers, lol My 13 yr old loved Warwick Castle , most especially the jousting show, I thought they did a great job of it too.

Posted by
1986 posts

I am a big fan of York, but even for me 2 days to throughly see the town (within the walls) is enough. the moors are definitely worth extra time(especially if you rent your own car). i prefer the moors to the seasidee- unless you are aiming at a typical British seaside resort experience.
I enjoyed Warwick Castle before it was so commercialized, but would definitely vote for Hampton Court- so much to see in the house and gardens. If you are doing Kew- i would suggest boat back from Kew rather than from Hampton Court, the ride is shorter from Kew, but easily long enough to enjoy the experience. Definitely see Stonehenge and Avebury. they will linger in your mind for the rest of your life.

Posted by
11507 posts

See, everyone is different, I thought Stonehenge was just "ok"..

Posted by
3580 posts

I like Warwick castle a lot. So some of the events connected are a little "cheesy"! I enjoy seeing demos of long-bow vs cross-bow use. I enjoyed the museums within the castle. When I was last there events were staged throughout the day, demonstrating medieval activities. The castle appears intact and is in a setting isolated from the town. And there is the living quarters demo of a 1890s house party. I loved the realistically-displayed wax figures of famous people including Churchill as a young man, the Prince of Wales and his son, the rooms as they might have appeared then. The walk into town is easy and pleasant. In fact, I stayed in Warwick and took daytrips from there for several days. Coventry is a bus ride away, as are Stratford-upon-Avon and several Cotswold villages.

Posted by
635 posts

To get a train to Bath, I think you'll have to first go into London and then turn around in Paddington for a train to Bath. There is a bus that goes from Heathrow directly to Bath. I think that in the end the bus will be faster. We spent two nights and one day in Bath and it was plenty. Add a day for the Mad Max tour and you're covered. If you are interested, the best evensong I've heard in GB is in Wells which is about a 45 minute bus ride from Bath. The cathedral has excellent accoustics and the setting is very intimate.

Posted by
26 posts

I was looking at the train vs bus schedules and from what I found, it seemed like it took slightly over 2 hrs on the train going through Paddington, but on the bus it was almost 4 hours! Re: Warwick and the shows - my girls really like that kind of role play/demonstrations (Williamsburg, Quebec City museums that had dress up, etc.) So I'll have to think about it further!