Please sign in to post.

Bath or Oxford?

Hello, we will have five days to visit other towns after we visit London and before we get to Edinburgh. Our plans are to take the train to Oxford and rent a car the next day, then go to the Cotswolds where we'll spend two nights in the area. After that we'll go to York for two nights where we'll drop the car off since we'll be taking the train to Edinburgh. We'll also return to London by train. But, we'd also love to see Bath and wonder if we should go to Bath instead of Oxford and continue our itinerary. Would appreciate suggestions.

Posted by
1162 posts

I've been to both and to me, Bath is more picturesque and has more sights.

Posted by
1 posts

Been to both several times and I would agree that Bath is the better choice. Stow-on-the-Wold is lovely. Of course Hadrian's Wall and York Minster are a must
to see.

Posted by
1986 posts

I would always do another night in the Cotswolds (and possibly see blenheim or Stonehenge/Avebury) but of your choices, Bath is a lot easier and more compact for a visotor.

Posted by
2450 posts

Try to also visit town of Wells with great cathedral, I think only about half hour from Bath, you can see if on one of Rick's videos. Be sure to take the free walking tour of Bath which you can pick down by the church. We stayed at the Henry B&B, good location and I think they had done major renovations. It does have shared baths though. To find a B&B we usually use Smoothound.com which gives great details.

Posted by
12313 posts

I like both but would chose Bath, it's a really pretty town. The Roman Baths and Cathedral were very interesting to me. The architecture and building materials make Bath probably the prettiest Georgian period town in England.

Posted by
10 posts

So many helpful hints. We will definitely try to maximize our time and see as much of the English countryside and towns as possible. Thanks to all!

Posted by
837 posts

While Bath is nice and Wells cathedral is impressive, I would definitely choose Oxford. Bath is at least an hour and a half out of your way, each way. The general Oxford area includes Blenheim, Stratford, all of the Cotswolds, Warwick, Coventry, and Kenilworth. There is a magnificent, free auto museum in Coventry. There is much to see in Oxford if you follow the walking tour in the Steves' book.

Posted by
970 posts

Bath is, by the book, more scenic than Oxford, especially in spring and summer. But, while Bath has its scenic charms, Oxford has its own compelling attractions. After all, it is a college town, probably "the" college town. Much of what Oxford has on offer is world class. I suggest doing some research on what each city offers and spending some time with a travel guide that offers lots of photos of either city. Nothing like a bunch of good photos to give you a feel for the looks of a place. Oxford is a one-hour trip from Paddington. Bath is about two hours out of Paddington. For the purposes of your itinerary (a good one, btw) either one will work. If you're like me, York is the place you'll want to visit again.

Posted by
349 posts

If you go to bath from waterloo station you will change trains in Salsbery so can see another great site for free. Padington is quicker and more expensive

Posted by
41 posts

Agree with above re Bath very pretty and the baths interesting, the circle architecture different but a day walking around Oxford is fascinating in a different way especially if you like history. You see places where Tolstoy taught, the pub where C.S.Lewis and his mates drank and the sight of looking down on the spires of Oxford is very unique. The university buildings are magnificent. We caught a train from London for the day, walked around ALL day and had a marvellous time. If you aren't interested in any of that sort of thing then go to Bath.