Please sign in to post.

Include Zermatt in 10 night itinerary?

Hello everyone. My husband, 1.5 yr old son, and I will be spending a total of 10 nights in Switzerland from June 15 - June 24, 2017. We will then be taking the train to Florence. So far we have planned the following itinerary:

June 15: Arrival in Milan (flight is already booked) - Train to Lucerne (Spend 3 nights)

Train to Wengen (Spend 5 nights)

Train to Zermatt (Spend 2 nights)

Train to Florence

I am, however, second guessing our 2 nights in Zermatt. Knowing how unpredictable the weather can be, I'm worried that it will end up raining/no visibility of the Matterhorn both nights we are there (I just came back from a beach vacation where it rained our entire stay, so I may be overly cautious of the weather because of this).

Would you recommend spending the last 2 nights in Spiez instead, where we can just take a daytrip to Zermatt to see the Matterhorn if there was good weather (although I know it will make for a long day, which is difficult with a 1.5 yr old). And if the weather is bad, then we can just take a daytrip around the lake or daytrip to Bern.

I was also thinking of skipping Zermatt altogether and maybe spending 2 nights in either Lugano (never been) or Lake Como (previously visited and loved it) before heading to Lucerne. Although my husband does have his heart set on seeing the Matterhorn...

Or would you recommend a different place all together for those 2 nights instead of Zermatt?

Thank you in advance for your reply. I would greatly appreciate your advice.

Posted by
2908 posts

Hi,

I'd go for the 2 nights in Zermatt. Gives you 1/2 a day, a full day, and a morning. While we love Wengen (our favorite place in Switzerland), maybe do 4 nights and 3 in Zermatt?

Paul

Posted by
11329 posts

Excellent advice from Paul. We liked Zermatt a lot and staying one more night means a better chance of seeing "The" mountain. Spiez is cute situated as it is on the lake, but not as charming as Zermatt, IMO. One of the special things about Zermatt is that it is car-free, and the mountaineering museum is worthwhile.

Posted by
271 posts

You have 2 days to deal with here.

My question is why do you want to go to Zermatt?

I read that your husband has his heart set on seeing the Matterhorn. If that is the only reason then go to Zermatt--you pretty much HAVE to go there to see the Matterhorn. If seeing the Matterhorn isn't THAT important (sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't) then skip Zermatt. To rehash from previous posts, it is crowded (often shoulder to shoulder), like Bourbon Street but without the nasty alleyway smells/puddles, and more similar to a Disney experience than an afternoon in the Alps--in my opinion :) Probably better beer, though.

Saas Fee next door is a lot slower and just as beautiful, Engelberg in central Switzerland below Luzern is in a beautiful valley where you have great access to both ridges (two SAC huts easily accessed above/near Engelberg), Grindelwald is smaller than Zermatt and is in a great valley, or Wengen (sort of) next door.

Posted by
262 posts

I have been to Zermatt many times and love it. It can be busy at certain times with skiers and their equipment, but the Matterhorn is here and it's worthwhile to see.
Lugano is a lovely area and worthwhile to visit as well.

Posted by
271 posts

Each time I have been it was busy and no skiers or other type of equipment in site. I have been in June, July, and September. Shoulder to shoulder each time and all tourists who looked like they had no plans to leave the city.

I also saw that someone called Zermatt 'quaint'. I have never thought about Zermatt as quaint. Zermatt is, in fact, the opposite of quaint. If it wasn't so big bursting with people I would call it the largest alpine village in Switzerland, I just can't bring myself to call it a village.

Posted by
12040 posts

I'll defend Zermatt a little...

Yes, the town is crowded, but only Rickniks visit Alpine towns for the towns themselves... it's the mountains that you come to see. I've spent lots of time all over the Alps, but I've never seen scenary more spectacular than the mountain vistas that unfold before your eyes above Zermatt. However, from the valley in Zermatt, the lower slopes block most of this scenery (expect the peaks of the Matterhorn and Monte Rosa). You really have to hike up into the meadows to get the full picture. So, it's much more than just the Matterhorn, as beautiful as that peak might be.

Posted by
2908 posts

We visited in mid October. It wasn't very busy. We took the Gornergrat trip and walked part of the way down from the top, all the while with the Matterhorn in front of us (plus many other peaks). Talk about a memorable day.

Paul