So, I have to say that it really distresses me to read, "I see Iona as a 'redundancy' though it's definitely unique of its own, we could find that kind of panoramic almost anywhere in Scotland..." This island has a very special place in Scottish history. It shouldn't be visited just for it's views. I understand the pull of puffins, and that people have different interests, but this dismissal of Iona is disturbing and sad. When I did the tour of Staffa and Iona, it was on Iona that I spent the most time. Staff is a beautiful geologic wonder. Iona is rich in history and today is a place of peace. I encourage anyone looking at these tours to dig a bit deeper into what Iona has meant in the past for Scotland and what its meaning is today. Try this link to BBC for a starting point and here for information about the present ecumenical community. Try this link. If you haven't found Historic Scotland yet in researching Scotland, here's a starting point and of course the newly renamed Historic Environment Scotland. And while I've not read any of these Amazon.com is full of books on Iona. The ones that caught my eye are Steven /.Sarjeant, Watteville, Roy, and McArthur.
I realize that part of my distress is related to the fact that I was on, or about to land on Iona when the planes hit the World Trade Center Towers, but I didn't know that when I was there. When I was there I was able to enjoy the peace of place and reflect the history and present work of the current community.
Scotland is packed with beautiful scenery and wildlife, but the variations that humans, geography, history and more have brought to the individual places need to be considered when thinking about this wonderful country.
Pam