Please sign in to post.
Posted by
1873 posts

Thank you for the interesting article, it gives a good overview of the intricacies that went into rebuilding Warsaw. Though I must strongly disagree with calling Warsaw's old town "Fake" by the article. "Fake" implies that something is inauthentic, when on the contrary the article demonstrates just how authentically the old town was rebuilt, using the same bricks and stones many times, no less.

Posted by
4168 posts

Interesting article, having been to Poland in 1989.
I am a student of history and lived in Germany (working for the US Army) from 87-91. We took a week long bus tour of Poland in 1989 that included most of the major cities in that country. I purchased books with photos of those cities after WWII.
Cites like Warsaw were virtually and totally destroyed in the war. Our guides there told us that it was rare for a building in that city that was not destroyed or seriously damaged. The one city in Poland that was not seriously bombed or damaged was Krakow. Also, parts of Gdansk were not damaged.

According to the article the "Old Town" was rebuilt as much as possible as it was prior to the war. Many cities in Europe, especially Germany tried to do this as well. The Frauen Kirche, or cathedral in Munich was rebuilt with its original stone. It is as original as can be. Cites like Nurenburg, Munich, Cologne, Berlin, Hamburg, all sustained tremendous damages with Cologne and Berlin being much like Warsaw. The famous Cologne Cathedral was one building that didn't sustain much damage, although allied bomber personnel said that they generally didn't try to save the Cathedral, it is likely that they did.

I lived in Augsburg and about half of the buildings in that city were destroyed or seriously damaged. The famous city hall burned, but its very thick walls survived and the building was rebuilt within those walls to be almost identical to the original.

If you go to the Great Wall of China that dates back to the third century BC you will be told that the wall was damaged and repaired over the centuries. During the Ming dynasty 5-600 years ago the wall was repaired to its original strength, perhaps more.
Also, since then, I am sure that maintenance of the wall has required substantial work.

I suppose it is a philosophical matter as to how old are such structures. Even great works of art are repaired, such as the Sistine Chapel at the Vatican was cleaned and restored by Japanese firms about 30 years ago. I have seen the Sistine Chapel before and after the restoration and would consider the restored work to be the original.