Please sign in to post.

Which of the 3 Norway cruises is good for us in terms of relaxing itineraries?

My wife and I are planning to go on a cruise next year to Norway in UK P&O next year in May/June from Australia in Down Under

I see there are 2 different types of ships next year in May. One is Iona and the other is Britannia ship
We aren't too fussy with the ship but more on the itinerary
We have never been to Norway and we are both more of a scenic type of person

Basically the 2 ships have a few dates slightly altered itineraries and have trouble choosing as each itinerary is very similar to each other except there is 1 or 2 omitted from the itinerary out of the 3 replacing/including Haugesund, Alesund, Flam, Sognefjord, Norway(2 cruises available out of 2) and Bergen (though this one is only from 7am to 2pm) while the others are:
Please see the itinerary for your reference in order to avoid confusion and better layout:

https://www.cleancruising.com.au/cruise/PAOBRI007_20240503

https://www.cleancruising.com.au/cruise/PAOBRI007_20240531

https://www.cleancruising.com.au/cruise/PAOION007_20240511

Just to let you know, we are more of a cruise scenery type and love to see the breathtaking view from the top or cute town villages. Not really so much into history.

In that case, out of the 3 itinerary would be suitable for us?

And if we were to choose the balcony, any tips so we can see the views cruising in Norway?
e.g. left or right hand side? which deck to avoid the partial blockage etc.

We don't mind aft or front since we both love rocking boat feeling!

Your feedback will be very very appreciated!

Thank you very much!

Posted by
2258 posts

I see 2 other options and want to mention them.

Cruises from Bergen or Trondheim with smaller Havila or Hurtigruten transport ships along the coast allow not wasting time with sea days. You can also fly to Oslo and use beautiful train ride to Bergen. With these ships you optimize "cruise scenery type" because they can drive closest along the coast. Itinerary is unbeatable by cruise ships. Prices are higher than regular cruises.

Cruises from Germany (Bremerhaven with Phoenix or from Hamburg or Kiel with Aida and Mein Schiff) are closer than from Southampton and do not cross the partly rough North Sea; they drive closer to coast. Staff on all ships speak English of course. Prices are comparable to the cruises from UK. Another advantage is that you are on European mainland and in Schengen zone already.

Good luck!

Posted by
8396 posts

These itineraries seem very close to me. Which one takes you to more of the UNESCO designated fjords? 2024 is the last year that ships that are not zero emissions can enter those fjords. You may want to consider that aspect.

The other aspect that might help differentiate is the size of the ship. For this routing I would say smaller is better.

Posted by
104 posts

These itineraries seem very close to me. Which one takes you to more of the UNESCO designated fjords? 2024 is the last year that ships that are not zero emissions can enter those fjords. You may want to consider that aspect. The other aspect that might help differentiate is the size of the ship. For this routing I would say smaller is better.

Thank you Carol

I was not aware of that!

In that case, may I ask this itinerary covers all the UNESCO aspects that you mentioned as I realised this one is a bit different from the 3 above I mentioned i.e.

https://www.cleancruising.com.au/cruise/PAOION007_20240525

If so, I will take this one!

Posted by
5821 posts

There are no Zero Emission cruise ships currently. Iona is a Low Emission ship, but not Zero Emission.

It is not clear how rigidly this rule is going to be applied. If all cruise ships are really to be stopped from visiting certain fjords the effect on the economy is going to be serious. There may be a more pragmatic approach ultimately.

But currently Havila and Hurtigruten are the only lines to meet the rules. They are the two lines who run the Coastal voyage- but the clue is in the name- they sail along the coast.

If the new rule really is taken seriously it may be that cruise lines will become the same as Havila/Hurtigruten and be confined to sailing the coast, and you may have to take local ferries to enter the fjords. Ports like Haugesund, Stavanger and Bergen (on these itineraries) will remain cruise ports as they are on the coast, but the others we have to wait and see.

Iona does not remotely meet the "smaller is better" thought. She (and others of her class with various lines) is huge, which is why there are only certain of the fjords she can enter. Iona takes over 5,000 passengers.
Britannia is around 1,000 passengers less, but is still a large ship.
Ideally for a fjord itinerary you want a 1,500 to 2,000 pax ship (or less).
Places like Olden are tiny, and ships like Iona- their passengers multiply the population of places like Olden by several hundred per cent.

Posted by
2258 posts

For the interested ones the German NABU (environmental association) does an annual cruise line ranking how many environmental friendly measures were realised. The results 2022 you can find here.

Posted by
27142 posts

Hurtigruten and Havila both go into the Geirangerfjord on northbound trips after making tye first if their two stops in Alesund.

Posted by
5821 posts

Hurtigruten and Havila both go into the Geirangerfjord on northbound trips after making tye first if their two stops in Alesund.

Only from the start of June to the end of August for Hurtigruten. And for some reason the Nordlys has not been serving Geirangerfjord at all this year. No idea about Havila.

Posted by
27142 posts

Yes, it's a summer-only feature. I meant to mention ithat in my post. That's strange about the Nordlys.