I've read a lot of the info here about the disadvantages of staying in Flåm and the advantages of staying in Aurland. However, we are just staying one night to break up our Oslo-Bergen NiN trip, and we're more of the sit in a cafe and soak it all in kind of tourists than the hike, bike, and zipline tourists (4 adults in our 50s/60s and a 17yo). We will want to see the Flåmsbana museum and probably eat at the Ægir brewpub. If we play the timing right, we might take the bus out to the Borgund Stave Church as well. I like the idea of staying in Aurland, but I'm worried that it will just add extra logistics during our short stay since we won't have a car. I know I need to book something asap as we're traveling in mid-August.
Should I stop "fretting" and grab two rooms at the Fretheim Hotel while they're still available? Or should I go off the beaten path to Aurland? Any other options to consider? Thank you!