Please sign in to post.

Which city sounds better for 1st day/night arrival? Milan or Venice

Hi!
Planning to go to Italy for the first time from California, and trying to decide which city/airport should we arrive and stay first:
Milan or Venice?
Not in this order, but we really want to spend sometime in:
Lake Como (or any of The Lakes) - Tuscany (countryside vineyards) - Cinque Terre - both Venice and Treviso (my great grandparents were born in Treviso) - back home from Rome.

Thank you!

Posted by
23957 posts

Personally I don't think it makes any difference. I would go with the one that is more convenient. However,, with your schedule you might consider Venice and head west with min back tracking.

Posted by
8624 posts

Venice is the perfect place to get over jet lag

If you choose Milan I recommend going right to Stresa on Lake Maggiore -easy to get to from MXP

Venice is much easier to fly IN to than out of

Posted by
7 posts

Thank you Frank and Christine!
So, Christine, do you think this below would be reasonable?
Flying to Venice, then after stay in Milan or should go strait to Stresa on Lake Maggiore (?), then Cinque Terre and Tuscany.

Posted by
3670 posts

Venice-Treviso-Italian Lakes-Milan--Cinque Terre-Tuscany-Rome.

Posted by
8624 posts

When is this trip and how many nights in Italy?

Stresa works if you are flying in or out of Milan
Otherwise from Venice I would go to Garda and skip Milan

Posted by
7658 posts

Check flight arrivals and departures for Venice from/to your home airport. For us, there was a midday departure.

Posted by
7 posts

This trip is for September 2026, anniversary trip ;-)
We are planning 21 days. I am thinking avoiding Rome this time.

Posted by
17068 posts

I would do:

SFO/LAX (whichever airport you use) > VCE (via any European hub > visit Venice and Treviso > Lake Como or Lake Garda > Florence/Tuscany > Cinque Terre > Rome > Fly back from Rome FCO.

In terms of flights, I would look for a flight that takes you directly from your airport in California directly to Europe, then connect to Venice. For example with United/Lufthansa/ITA airways or Delta/AirFrance-KLM.

You don't need to fly to Milan at all for your trip, unless you want to. Most flights to Milan arrive at MXP, which is farther west, almost half way between Milan and Turin.

Posted by
7 posts

Thank you Roberto,
We live on the central coast, so either LAX or SFO works....I will take a look on the flights timing.

Posted by
8624 posts

Make sure you are searching for “multi-city” flights or open jaw -NOT 2 one way flights
Usually under Advanced Search
Begin your search in Google Flights-set up some price alerts
Book with the actual airline

Why skip Rome??
21 days (or nights) is a great amount of time
Try to stay 3-4 nights in each location

Venice 3
Treviso 2
Garda or Como-3
Florence 3
Tuscany hilltown 3-4 with car
CT-2-3
Rome-at least 4 or as many nights as you can give it

Posted by
7 posts

Thank you. I will check the flights. I was thinking about the time to visit Rome. We are both in the wine industry and it would be nice to visit Valdobbiadene and Valpolicella regions on this trip. Just trying to figure it out if it would be doable one day trip to the "prosecco region" and how to get there and how to get to Valpolicella.

Posted by
8624 posts

Valpolicella is outside Verona
Train from Venice to Verona is easy ( fast or regional trains)
Then probably bus or driver to vineyards
You might look for guided tours from Verona or from Lake Garda

Verona itself is worth a few nights-you could stay there and day trip to Garda and vineyards

Posted by
17068 posts

SFO/LAX (whichever airport you use) > VCE (via any European hub) >visit Venice and Treviso > Lake Como or Lake Garda > Florence/Tuscany > Cinque Terre > Rome > Fly back from Rome FCO.

Since you are interested in the wine regions, then I would stick to Lake Garda, rather than Lake Como. They are equally beautiful, but Valpolicella is really close to Lake Garda, and if you are interested in the prestigious Franciacorta bubbly wine from the homonymous region (between Lake Garda and Lake Iseo) you can visit that too.

In that case I would also rent a car, because it will be convenient to visit rural wine areas both in Veneto and in Tuscany.

This is my revised suggested itinerary.

-SFO/LAX (whichever airport you use) > VCE (via any European hub)

-Visit Venice and Treviso, and possibly Verona (none of these cities need a car to visit).
Venice deserves 2 or 3 nights, and maybe an extra one for a day trip to Treviso.
Verona deserves a full day, so you could go there from Venice in the morning and spend one full day, and sleep one night in Verona.

-The next morning rent a car in Verona to see the lakes and the wine areas.

-Visit Lake Garda, Valpolicella, Franciacorta (lake Iseo) with the rental car. You will need at least 3 nights for the lakes.

-Drive with the same rental car to Tuscany's wine area of your interest (Chianti hills, or also Val d'Orcia for Brunello di Montalcino, if you are interested in wine areas). Stay in that area with the car.

-Drive to Florence. Return the car upon arrival.

-Visit Florence for 2 or 3 nights.

-Train to Cinque Terre

-Visit Cinque Terre for 1 to 3 nights.

-Train to Rome

-Visit Rome for 3 or 4 nights

-Fly back to US from Rome (FCO). If you want there are non stop flights from FCO to SFO (ITA Airways and, in summer, United) and to LAX (ITA Airways)