Please sign in to post.

Which city sounds better for 1st day/night arrival? Milan or Venice

Hi!
Planning to go to Italy for the first time from California, and trying to decide which city/airport should we arrive and stay first:
Milan or Venice?
Not in this order, but we really want to spend sometime in:
Lake Como (or any of The Lakes) - Tuscany (countryside vineyards) - Cinque Terre - both Venice and Treviso (my great grandparents were born in Treviso) - back home from Rome.

Thank you!

Posted by
23986 posts

Personally I don't think it makes any difference. I would go with the one that is more convenient. However,, with your schedule you might consider Venice and head west with min back tracking.

Posted by
8683 posts

Venice is the perfect place to get over jet lag

If you choose Milan I recommend going right to Stresa on Lake Maggiore -easy to get to from MXP

Venice is much easier to fly IN to than out of

Posted by
10 posts

Thank you Frank and Christine!
So, Christine, do you think this below would be reasonable?
Flying to Venice, then after stay in Milan or should go strait to Stresa on Lake Maggiore (?), then Cinque Terre and Tuscany.

Posted by
3769 posts

Venice-Treviso-Italian Lakes-Milan--Cinque Terre-Tuscany-Rome.

Posted by
8683 posts

When is this trip and how many nights in Italy?

Stresa works if you are flying in or out of Milan
Otherwise from Venice I would go to Garda and skip Milan

Posted by
7786 posts

Check flight arrivals and departures for Venice from/to your home airport. For us, there was a midday departure.

Posted by
10 posts

This trip is for September 2026, anniversary trip ;-)
We are planning 21 days. I am thinking avoiding Rome this time.

Posted by
17134 posts

I would do:

SFO/LAX (whichever airport you use) > VCE (via any European hub > visit Venice and Treviso > Lake Como or Lake Garda > Florence/Tuscany > Cinque Terre > Rome > Fly back from Rome FCO.

In terms of flights, I would look for a flight that takes you directly from your airport in California directly to Europe, then connect to Venice. For example with United/Lufthansa/ITA airways or Delta/AirFrance-KLM.

You don't need to fly to Milan at all for your trip, unless you want to. Most flights to Milan arrive at MXP, which is farther west, almost half way between Milan and Turin.

Posted by
10 posts

Thank you Roberto,
We live on the central coast, so either LAX or SFO works....I will take a look on the flights timing.

Posted by
8683 posts

Make sure you are searching for “multi-city” flights or open jaw -NOT 2 one way flights
Usually under Advanced Search
Begin your search in Google Flights-set up some price alerts
Book with the actual airline

Why skip Rome??
21 days (or nights) is a great amount of time
Try to stay 3-4 nights in each location

Venice 3
Treviso 2
Garda or Como-3
Florence 3
Tuscany hilltown 3-4 with car
CT-2-3
Rome-at least 4 or as many nights as you can give it

Posted by
10 posts

Thank you. I will check the flights. I was thinking about the time to visit Rome. We are both in the wine industry and it would be nice to visit Valdobbiadene and Valpolicella regions on this trip. Just trying to figure it out if it would be doable one day trip to the "prosecco region" and how to get there and how to get to Valpolicella.

Posted by
8683 posts

Valpolicella is outside Verona
Train from Venice to Verona is easy ( fast or regional trains)
Then probably bus or driver to vineyards
You might look for guided tours from Verona or from Lake Garda

Verona itself is worth a few nights-you could stay there and day trip to Garda and vineyards

Posted by
17134 posts

SFO/LAX (whichever airport you use) > VCE (via any European hub) >visit Venice and Treviso > Lake Como or Lake Garda > Florence/Tuscany > Cinque Terre > Rome > Fly back from Rome FCO.

Since you are interested in the wine regions, then I would stick to Lake Garda, rather than Lake Como. They are equally beautiful, but Valpolicella is really close to Lake Garda, and if you are interested in the prestigious Franciacorta bubbly wine from the homonymous region (between Lake Garda and Lake Iseo) you can visit that too.

In that case I would also rent a car, because it will be convenient to visit rural wine areas both in Veneto and in Tuscany.

This is my revised suggested itinerary.

-SFO/LAX (whichever airport you use) > VCE (via any European hub)

-Visit Venice and Treviso, and possibly Verona (none of these cities need a car to visit).
Venice deserves 2 or 3 nights, and maybe an extra one for a day trip to Treviso.
Verona deserves a full day, so you could go there from Venice in the morning and spend one full day, and sleep one night in Verona.

-The next morning rent a car in Verona to see the lakes and the wine areas.

-Visit Lake Garda, Valpolicella, Franciacorta (lake Iseo) with the rental car. You will need at least 3 nights for the lakes.

-Drive with the same rental car to Tuscany's wine area of your interest (Chianti hills, or also Val d'Orcia for Brunello di Montalcino, if you are interested in wine areas). Stay in that area with the car.

-Drive to Florence. Return the car upon arrival.

-Visit Florence for 2 or 3 nights.

-Train to Cinque Terre

-Visit Cinque Terre for 1 to 3 nights.

-Train to Rome

-Visit Rome for 3 or 4 nights

-Fly back to US from Rome (FCO). If you want there are non stop flights from FCO to SFO (ITA Airways and, in summer, United) and to LAX (ITA Airways)

Posted by
1010 posts

I like Roberto's ideas! But if you're avoiding Rome (you said upthread) you could head to Milan after CT, do a bit there and then fly out of Milan too :) I have my eye on Stresa on Lake Maggiore for a stay before a Milan flight :)

Posted by
10 posts

Thank you Katherine!
So much to do! I am afraid that visiting for the 1st time I want to do a lot (wine/food/relax/romance/culture), but I like to plan.
I like your idea Roberto! To visit Valdobbiadene and Conegliano as you did mention a visit by car, do you think I could do in one day from Treviso? Thank you s much! Oh, yeah....sparkling from Franciacorta would be amazing too!

Posted by
17134 posts

I wouldn’t bother to rent a car for a day only. If you have 3 nights at your disposal for your wine country travel ok.
You only have 3 weeks, so you have to make choices, you can’t visit it all.
Venice needs 3 nights
Verona needs a full day, and at least one night if you are interested in opera at the Arena.
Lake Garda and Valpolicella or Franciacorta needs 3 nights
Treviso also needs a day, but it can be visited from Venice, it’s near.
Florence needs 3 nights
Tuscan countryside maybe another 3 nights
Cinque Terre is hard to reach. You can see it in a day but to get there is what takes time.
Rome, if you want to see it, needs 4 or at least 3 nights.

Posted by
2090 posts

We spent 2 wonderful nights in Verona this past May, and we would have enjoyed another night. While there, we took a wine tour to the Valpolicella wine region. The tour was with Pagus Tours in Verona, and it was wonderful. We were the first tour of the season, and luckily, there was just me and my husband. They take a maximum of 8 passengers. Our driver and tour guide was wonderful. Very friendly, warm, and knowledgeable.

Posted by
10 posts

Oh my ... thank you so much for the recommendation on the driver! This is what we do at central coast Cali and appreciate a great referral!

Posted by
2797 posts

hey hey Ms Liberalli
hey hey
sent you a message, look in your account upper right corner
aloha

Posted by
183 posts

Skip Cinque Terre and relax for an extra day or two in the Tuscan wine area.
If you fly to Milan one day one night is plenty. Then get a car and do the lakes and then ditch the car and stay a few nights in Venice. After that take a train to Florence and do the city. Then get a car and visit the Tuscan hill towns and wineries. End in Rome for at least three nights.