Tara, you have 10 nights/9.5 days to work with, and the .5 one - which is your arrival in Venice - could be a jet-lagged fog. For all the reasons already provided above, yes, 5 locations are way too many for the amount of time you have. You don't want to spend too much of it packing, unpacking, changing hotels, dealing with train stations and sitting on transport, right?
So I'd get down to no more than 3. What those should be depends on your interests: why did you choose them, and which of them do you most want to spend time on? Venice and Rome are givens, as you're flying into one and out of the other, so you'll cut two of Lake Como, Cinque Terre or Tuscany.
Personally, I don't think renting a car for a first trip is a good idea. You definitely don't want or need one for Venice or Rome, and you could easily travel between Venice, Rome and your 3rd choice via public transit. Now, if you choose "Tuscany" you don't want to locate in the countryside without a car. Florence (capitol of Tuscany) makes a nice base for day trips to Siena, Lucca and some other locations by bus or train so that's an option. You might also hire a driver for a day exploring the countryside. Anyway, It's quicker to get to from Venice than it would be to the CT.
Venice: 3 nights/2.5 days
Florence: 3 nights/2.5 days (including 1 day trip outside of the city)
Rome: 4 nights/3.5 days
But if want you want to see in Rome is minimal, you could steal one of those nights, add it to Florence, and use it for a 2nd day trip. These are just suggestions so if you want to swap out Florence for Lake Como or the CT, that's entirely up to you. IMHO, you're just going to experience more with less stress if you reduce the moving around.