bureaucracy to get out of its own way and be able implement a system that doesn't cost more than the revenue it brings in.
Actually, when they lowered the fee to 5 euro, they openly stated that the revenue generated would only barely cover the administrative cost to distribute the passes. This is being promoted as a "test", which would logically mean that in application, the cost would need to go up, which as I stated, would need to be closer to 50 euro to discourage visitors and provide meaningful funds for maintenance or improvement...but that will never happen. While many cities lament overtourism, it is like lamenting about having too many customers, a problem, but not one you want to solve. Cities instead focus on removing the "bad" tourists, which in their eyes are the ones that do not spend enough, or create disturbance. Unfortunately, budget travelers, like a number on this forum, tend to be classed as "bad tourists".