Please sign in to post.

Trieste - ideas (and a sanity check)

We're exploring our options to get from Nice to Trieste (1st week in July). We've been using Skyscanner & Rome2Rio so have some of the basic options in front of us.

Flying: We only do non-stop hops (i.e., no connecting flights, to avoid the associated stress) so would be open to a flight into some place we wouldn't mind staying a few days, if that place was a direct connect to Trieste. That said, there are very few places are a direct flight into Trieste -- and even fewer that are direct out of Nice. We are open to traveling from Nice to, say, Marseille if that gave better options -- but so far it doesn't appear to. Milan is a distant potential; Rome is off the list.

Train: Admittedly, the actual July train options are not yet posted this far in advance so this may prove to be the most viable path. We'd like a train with no/minimal connections.

Drive: DH thinks driving could be the easiest. To avoid the 'rent in one country return in another' situation, we'd likely need to go to, say, Genoa, rent a car, drive to Trieste, and turn it in.

All that said, are we losing sight of a bigger picture? Is Trieste worth all this fretting???

This all began rather spur-of-the-moment (because of a conference that was going to be in Trieste and we later decided not to attend). But by that time we'd been looking into Trieste (found out that illy was founded in Trieste) so it remained on our "interesting places to see" list as an interesting (& new) place to stick our map-pin in.

(Background: This is just a smallish segment in the latter part of a multi-week itinerary where we'll have been in Spain & France for 1-month++ and will be working our way from Nice to (eventually) Ireland, over the latter 3 or so weeks of the trip. Trieste -> Munich -> Ireland seems doable to get out of Trieste; it's getting into Trieste that is proving to be the challenge.)

Thanks in advance for ideas and input (pro & con).

Posted by
16893 posts

Currently, you can travel from Nice Ville station to Trieste Centrale with a single train connection in Milan if you depart at 14:00 and arrive to Trieste at 23:30. (You can also depart at 8:00 a.m. and make an extended lunchtime layover in Milan, then eventually catch the same onward train.) Improvements that would create more 1-connection options instead of 2-connections are theoretically possible when the summer schedule gets announced, but I would not hold out for that. Currently, three trains per day cross the French border without requiring a change there and roughly 4/day run directly from Milan to Trieste, but timing for most of these is not synchronized to meet up.

Posted by
5687 posts

How about flying Nice to Venice then take the train (or bus) on to Trieste? easyJet has cheap direct flights though they are at different times depending on what day it is. FlixBus has direct buses a few times a day directly from Marco Polo airport to Trieste that take about 2 hours; if you can't sync up with one of those, then you'd have to get to Venice Mestre station probably by bus to catch a train on to Trieste.

Posted by
2186 posts

I haven't yet been to Trieste (going in May), but this does seem crazy to me. There are so many wonderful places to visit that wouldn't have you going so far out of your way.

Posted by
3122 posts

Are you determined not to spend any time in Venice? I'm just thinking Venice could be a reasonable jumping-off spot to get to Trieste. You could even do it as a day trip, as the train is just over 2 hours each way.

Posted by
5405 posts

Trieste is a third tier city only worth visiting if you’re in the area. Beautiful places nearby in Slovenia, though. But Trieste? Not worth the effort.

Posted by
2487 posts

But Trieste? Not worth the effort.
Tastes differ. The city had been on my list for decades (as was nearby Palmanova), and I was not disappointed. On the contrary.

We'd like a train with no/minimal connections
It is a long way from Nice. With a stop in Turin (Torino) it becomes a lot more manageable. Elegant city, if only for its 15 kilometers or so of arcaded streets.
I have seen a reasonable connection from Nice with only one change, and the same to Trieste.

Posted by
7688 posts

Been to Trieste, it's OK, but there are far more interesting places to visit in Italy.
I don't recommend driving across borders, you may have a huge drop fee for the car rental. Also, many who rent cars in Italy get very expensive tickets driving there. Also, using the autostradas incurs expensive tolls.

Also, Marseille is largely a dump, there are far more interesting places in the South of France like Nice, Monaco, Eze, St. Paul de Venice, Arles, Pont du Gard(ancient Roman aqueduct), Avignon and more.

Posted by
5687 posts

I would agree that Trieste is a good place to stop on the way to somewhere else but doesn't seem worth much effort to get to. I spent one night there on the way from Slovenia to Venice - Trieste had also been on my list of places to see that I had never quite made it to. Can't imagine why I would go back - didn't really do much for me. Some people do seem to love it, though.

Posted by
408 posts

Thanks for all the different opinions and options -- it's really a good cross-section of inputs!

A few comments: Venice? Could do, but it's one of those places where our one-and-only visit was so spectacular we're not tempted to return just for a hopping off spot. Interesting places in S. France? Yes, we will have been in Nice for a month and so will have toured back and forth a lot by rail and covered most of that stretch. Marseille? What can I say ... it's not glorious but it has kinda grown on us and it's an okay connection, if need be. Not really a 'dump' - have some pleasant memories there, nice walks/sights.

Agree that the car idea was only from desperation - driving in Italy? Crazy thought.

Many wonderful (other) places to see? For this year's trip planning, all our stops (so far) are repeats, returning to places we love a lot. But for a 10-week span we like to include at least one new place, just to see if we can have a pleasant 'surprise'. So far, Trieste was to be that surprise spot.

And tonfromleiden has now given us another candidate for a 'surprise'! Turin (Torino) -- haven't been there / hadn't considered it as a connection! Good potential. There's both a reasonable bus (Nice to Torino) and a not-too-complicated train connection: Ventimiglia is at the eastern end of our Nice rail run so after a month in S. France, we should be familiar with that leg. From there, by rail, it looks like there are several/day runs up to Torino. And from Torino to Trieste the connections look promising (arriving a tad late for our taste but doable).

So, for now, Trieste is still on the draft itinerary: Checking AirBnB/VRBO, the prices are really, really good, and the hosts appear to be competitively fixing up their properties (much like we found in Budapest & Prague last trip). And now we have the challenge of learning about Torino. It looks like that would call for more than just a day or two....