I've been having an internal debate about my upcoming itinerary and questioning if Venice is worth the effort and expense or if time would be better served by removing it.
I'll be traveling in and out of Rome via a Covid-flight, so I'll be taking on an extra travel step via train to get there, and wouldn't be arriving until around 8pm.
Right now, my itenerary looks like:
2 nights (1 full day) in Venice for Grand Cannel, St Mark’s, Doges Place
4 nights (3 full days) in Florence for Uffizi, Pitti, Bargello, Accademi, Domo, Medici Chappels, Boboli
5 nights (4 full days) in Salerno base for Pompei, Capri, Heracleum / Vesuvius, and Amalfi Coast
4 nights (3 full days) in Rome for Vatican City, Forum / Colosseum / Palatine, Borghese Gallery, Trevi Fountain, Spanish Steps
If I were to drop Venice, I could pad out both Florence and Rome by a night, perhaps to have a more relaxed trip and maybe include Siena day trip.
I'm mostly interested in history and the sea / cliffsides and do like to wander around twisty alleys and visit markets, being a part of the local evening promenade sounds lovely, and smaller mom and pop restaurants with simple meals will probably be my go to. Based on my preferences, I am starting to think that dropping Venice is the wise choice but looking for reasons to be convienced otherwise. Right now I have that it will probably never be cheaper, cleaner, or least crowded, which is a bit of a selling point I guess.
Any recommendations are appreciated!