I am planning a trip for early next June for 4 including my two teenage sons (16 and 18). My wife and I have been in Venice twice and Verona once. I also was on a whirlwind tour of Europe when I was in high school and went to Pisa, Rome , Florence, and Venice (but that is ancient history. My two sons love history, which is one of the main reasons I chose Italy for their first European visit. For the moment I am budgeting for 16 nights.
My initial itinerary was the following:
Land in Venice - 3 nights
Morning of 4th day, train to Florence - 3 nights
Morning of 7th day, train to Cinque Terre - 2 nights in Vernazza
9th day, pick up car in La Spezia (or possibly Pisa), Visit Pisa on way to Volterra or Sienna - stay two nights in either Volterra or Sienna
Spend one day touring Volterra/San Gimignano and the other in Sienna (days 10 and 11), That evening drive to Montepulciano/Pienza area - 2 nights here. Spend day 12 touring around this area.
Morning of 13th day, drive to Orvieto and visit it, then train to Rome - 4 nights in Rome
Day 17 fly home
But as I have been reading various guide books, I am realizing that there is so much to see, in Rome that I would like another day there. So I am considering dropping Cinque Terre from the itinerary, which would give me an extra night in Rome and the other night either in Florence or in the Tuscan countryside. (though this means picking up the car in Florence and having to drive out without hitting one of the dreaded ZTLs).
Anyway, I wonder how strongly people feel about visiting the Cinque Terre. I have to admit it really appeals to me when I see pictures, and it seems like an interesting break after Florence. But I cut out a lot of extra travel time by eliminating it. Anyone have any strong opinions about this?
Finally, if you had to choose between staying in (or near) Volterra and staying in Sienna, which would you choose?
Thanks in advance for your comments