We booked very affordable, nonstop tickets to Venice a few weeks back for our anniversary in October and we will be taking our 3 year old with us. It will be her first flight and international trip.
My wife and I have travelled internationally a bunch of times for 9-12 day trips and have always visited at least two or more major cities, but this will be our first time ever in Italy.
Initially the plan was to fly into Venice, spend 3-4 days there, take the train to Florence for another 3 days or so and then take the train back to Venice for our flight out. I've always wanted to see Florence. Birthplace of the Renaissance. See the Duomo, David, Perseus with Medusa.
We were just about to book our AirBnB for the Venice leg of the trip when the thought occurred that maybe it would be better if we just stay in Venice the entire time. The idea certainly sounds far more relaxing rather than rushing around on a tight schedule as visiting both Venice and Florence would add a lot of extra back and forth, especially with a 3 year old in tow on her first big trip. We only have 8 days and we won't be able to take in as much as we usually would since we'll have a little one with us.
Are we missing a prime opportunity to see Florence too since its "only" two hours away by train? Is a week too much time to spend in Venice and the surrounding islands or is it just right?
We were also toying with the idea of keeping our Venice BnB booked the entire time, leaving most of our stuff there, catching an early morning train to Florence and just spending a single night in a hotel there to cut down on all the complexity of packing up and moving all our luggage around, back and forth. Is that a waste? Could you get a decent enough taste of Florence with two half-days and a single night?
Any thoughts or feedback would be greatly appreciated.