Good morning, folks. I was wondering if anyone had a gut feeling on an itinerary I'm planning for October. I'll be doing an organized tour that meets at Venice Marco Polo airport early in the morning. I will fly to VEN and want some buffer time before the tour in case of flight delays, etc. but don't want to spend the time in Venice since I've already been there three times! I'm entertaining a few ideas for a sort of "add-on" destination.
Option 1:
- Day 1: Land in Venice, take train to Padua, some sleepy sightseeing, stay in Padua
- Day 2: More Padua, take train back to VEN late-afternoon, stay at Venice airport hotel
- Day 3: Tour starts
Option 2:
- Day 1: Land in Venice, take train to Ravenna, probably too tired to do much on arrival, stay in Ravenna
- Day 2: Ravenna sightseeing, stay in Ravenna
- Day 3: Half day more sightseeing, take train back to VEN after lunch, stay at Venice airport hotel
- Day 4: Tour starts
I'm intrinsically more interested in Ravenna, but it's considerably more train time, it appears that a large cruise ship docks daily in October, and I wonder if I'd be giving the sights short shrift. Since this is an add-on to the "real" trip the following week, I don't want to take more vacation time than I've outlined here. Does anyone more familiar with the area see one of these as obviously better than the other? Thanks!