Several of you were very helpful a few months ago when I asked a question about visiting Ravenna. I'm sure you will be as kind and helpful with my question this time.
My husband and I will be visiting Rome and Ravenna in May 2018. We think we want to visit Ravenna first, and then Rome, so that we can appreciate and negotiate around Rome better after getting over the jet lag. We're planning to fly to Rome, then take a train to Ravenna. I'm figuring that we should spend three nights in Ravenna, as the one day will just be arriving and then have two full days for sight-seeing there--the mosaics, Dante's tomb, etc.
I had wondered about flying into Venice or Florence first instead, and taking train from there to Ravenna. However, the travel time seems about the same as from Rome, and then we would have the advantage of having seen Rome's airport once and having some familiarity with the transportation to and from there for our trip home. What do you think?
Thanks,
Christie