Please sign in to post.

NYT article on how to travel

John Hooper says he is often a little puzzled by Italy.

“It’s a country that seems to be all on the surface, but actually a lot of things are hidden,” said Mr. Hooper, author of “The Italians,” a cultural study of the country that was published by Viking last month. “That can be at times sinister, but it can also be fascinating and rewarding, if you go off the beaten track.”

That is why Mr. Hooper, 65, thinks life is too short for tourist traps. Many people, he said, tend to prioritize Italy’s famous sites over its more sincere side, when in fact they should do the opposite.

Mr. Hooper, who lives and works in Rome as a journalist for The Economist and The Guardian, recently gave some cultural and culinary advice for travelers wanting to see Italy from an insider’s perspective. Following are edited excerpts from a conversation with Mr. Hooper.

Q. You mention Puglia in your book as a recently popular destination for tourists. What’s an area nearby that people don’t know about yet?

A. Basilicata. The tourist industry there is almost nonexistent, and yet in many ways it’s as beautiful as Tuscany. The people are very welcoming. When you’re down there the roads are very poor, so it can take a long time to get around from one place to another. But if you do, it’s really worth it.

Pasta is such a go-to food choice for foreigners. Should it be?

The Italian food with which they’re familiar is southern Italian food because immigrants have tended to come from Campania, Sicily and so on. People are not prepared for the meat-heavy diet that you get in places like Emilia, around Bologna. Or the equally meat- and game-heavy diet that you get in places like Umbria and Tuscany. There’s certainly much more variety than people realize.

Italians love to talk about food, right?

People become incredibly engaged in these conversations. Just recently — I was on the third floor, and I heard two people getting into the lift. And I thought: My God, there’s a terrible row going on. And as the lift drew closer to my floor, I heard “onion” and “bacon” and so on, and I realized it was an argument about pancetta.

What are faux pas to avoid with how you dress?

Even if you’re casually dressed, being smartly dressed helps. Otherwise people will be inclined to look down on you. Appearances count for a lot in Italy. If people dress in a slobbish way, then they can be expected to get the kind of treatment that is accorded to slobs.

What would be your first response if someone said: “I’m going to Italy next week. What should I do?”

Go to Venice. There’s just nowhere like it. Don’t expect the cuisine to be anything like what you imagine Italian cuisine to be. It’s a legume-based cuisine, and you find small aquatic creatures fried in batter and pickled dishes and goodness knows what else. Drink wines from the area. Don’t go to Venice, order Chianti and expect that you’re going to get something good. Order wine from the Veneto.

Try to get as far away as you can from Piazza San Marco. Look for areas of the city where there are still Venetians living. There are parts of Cannaregio where you can walk a number of streets and not come across a tourist.

Posted by
1791 posts

Mr. Hooper hopes to be seen as an insightful observer, but he doesn't deliver. Advice such as not ordering Chianti in Venice, and the roads are poor in Basilicata assault the reader with their triviality.

Posted by
15995 posts

Mike is right. Why should Chianti be bad in Venice? It's the same Chianti bottles you can buy anywhere else. I also don't remember roads in Basilicata being bad. There are good roads and bad roads everywhere. Some of the worst paved freeways are here in California (especially I580 on the Altamont pass, which cal literally kill your suspensions).

Posted by
7151 posts

I sometimes get a little peeved at people (writers or otherwise) who live somewhere, or spend time there on a regular basis, and then tell tourists who come with only a couple of weeks that they shouldn't go to any tourist traps. When you live somewhere and see places all the time they become not so important to you and you look at them as tourist traps when, in reality, they are the tourists' must-sees and with just a short time they're what you want to experience. Sure there are those tourists that want to only go off the beaten path but those are the minority and probably have already seen the usual tourist biggies.

Posted by
7737 posts

I agree 100% with Roberto and Nancy. Personally, I'm glad I've gone to some of the "tourist traps". Heck, all of Venice could be considered a tourist trap.

Posted by
4795 posts

My rule of thumb is the first time I go somewhere I want to see all the places I've heard about - that's why I'm there! The second time I head off the beaten path.

Posted by
1523 posts

Nancy is right, I lived and worked in st Louis after college.....all of my visitors wanted to go up the arch....which also has an amazing museum and a cool film about how the engineers figured it all out....... this was before 9/11 when it was a fast and mindless trip. many of my coworkers would roll their eyes and say they "had" to go on a field trip in 4th grade and had refused to ever go again.... some folks just get jaded and, forgive me, smug, pretty early in the game.