Hello People!
I am trying to determine if my plans for our next (and possibly last) trip to Italy seem the most flexible.
We are in our early seventies, fit, and have traveled to Europe and Italy several times. Our goal this trip is:
to see some wonderful northern landscapes,
visit some cultural sights,
and avoid crowds. (I know that won't be easy in Venice)
Avoid changing hotels/apts often.
To be in pedestrian/car free zones.
This is my current plan:
Fly to Venice (DH has never been, I've been twice) Arriving in the AM, so stay two nights.
On to Brescia-4 nights. (I chose Brescia, because it's half-way to Milan, and we could do a day trip to Bergamo. And I've seen several museums and such that we would be interested in, right in Brescia. And if weather is bad in Zermatt, it seems like we could reach other interesting places from there. )
On to Zermatt. DH's only MUST on this trip. So it's off to Zermatt, but I will check the weather before leaving Italy. Weather permitting, stay in Zermatt 4 days. If Zermatt will be fogged out, we are flexible for other places.
Back to Milan, stay one night, home from Milan.
I have been to Verona and Vicenza, Sirmione and Malcesine before, so not terribly interested in returning, but could be convinced. (An opera in Verona would be fun)
Also, I was originally thinking of hill towns in Tuscany, but since Zermatt is a must, I thought that staying in the north, would be less zig-zagging around. AND, I know that in June Tuscany will be swamped.
So, I guess my main question is: do you think Brescia is a good choice?
I do realize that we could just start in Venice, and end in Milan, and wing it in-between.
Your thoughts are appreciated.