Please sign in to post.

Itinerary Help- Cinque Terre Or No Cinque Terre

Hello All. We are leaving for Switzerland and Italy at the end of August and I think we may have crammed too much into the back half of the trip in Italy. We are spending 4 nights in Switzerland and then taking a 5.5 hour train from Luzern to Florence getting us in around 1PM. We had planned to spend 3 nights in Florence (1.5 days to explore the city and 1 day for a day trip to Siena and a few wineries), then train to Riomaggiore for 2 nights, and end the trip in Varenna/Lake Como for 2 nights before flying home from Milan. We are meeting friends in Lake Como so we are stuck with that destination, but the routes to get there seem to be very time consuming, tricky, or expensive. Rental car would probably be our best bet, but I haven't secured an international drivers license yet and we leave in under a month, plus it's still very expensive ($400 for a day) and not very convenient to have to pick it up. Any way we slice it or dice it, we'll end up not getting into Varenna until 2/3PM and then we'd really only have 1 full day to explore. Cinque Terre was very high on my list, but I feel like we should just cut this out from our trip. Note: I am not huge into museums while on vacation, so that's not a high priority in Florence, so keep that in mind when thinking about things to do there. Do we #1:

  1. Leave itinerary as is and just suck it up and rent a car or take a long winded train journey to Varenna (private transfers are $750, ouch, but understandable)
  2. Stay in Rapallo instead of Riomaggiore and just train down one of the days to explore some of CT , which is slightly longer from Florence, but has a 3.5 hour train to Varenna
  3. Cut out Cinque Terre (sigh) and add an extra night in Florence and an extra night in Lake Como
  4. Cut out Cinque Terre and add on another city in the north closer to Lake Como (suggestions of where to go?! Would Verona be too similar to Florence? I like variety on a trip like this. Wouldn't do the Dolomites because we'll be in Switzerland before)

thank you and sorry for the extremely long post!

Posted by
5158 posts

3 or 4--sort of, I would actually add both nights to Varenna/Lake Como--but do you need a night in Milan, or can you get to the airport for your flight out without another hotel change?
It is not the ideal time of year for CT--you will get much more out of spending longer somewhere, I can come close to guaranteeing you! I am seeing a lot of reports of CT being even more crowded than usual, and you are losing so much time on trains if you do not make this change. Two nights is practically nothing if you have long train rides on either end of it. Four nights in one place at the end of a trip sounds about right to me.

Posted by
7276 posts

but I haven't secured an international drivers license yet and we
leave in under a month

This doesn't take long- usually same day service at your local AAA.

But I'd either just suck it up, leave itinerary as is and take the train.
Or stay in Rapallo- we were just in Santa Margherita and loved our time there. It was May but there were no tourist crowds AT ALL.
Just not willing to spend so much on a car rental.

Posted by
11647 posts

It usually takes ten minutes at a local AAA to get an International Driving Permit. Bring correct size photo or have AAA take them for you. You are given your IDP before you leave.
Skip the CT this trip and give the time to Tuscany
( Siena or a Chianti village) and/or Lake Como.

Posted by
2208 posts

Skip CT. The dreamy CT Rick Steves shows in his videos sadly no longer exists now that cruise ships have put the region on their itinerary. You've actually got a very full schedule without it. Use that time in Florence. 1.5 days is not nearly enough time.

Posted by
5571 posts

Another vote to skip the CT. If CT is important to you, see it on another trip when it isn't wall to wall tourists and the weather isn't stifling hot and humid. What time is your flight out of Milan? Bear in mind the trains to the airport from Varenna are at least 2 hours, and you will want to be there 3 hours before your flight if it is direct to the US. If its a morning flight, you would probably want to stay near the airport the night before.

Posted by
17572 posts

You have a lot of moving around and short 2-night stays. Renting a car would not fix that, and adds problems of its own, as well as expense (high rental and gas prices).

I’d say cutting Cinque Terre is your best option. That is a long way to travel for what amounts to one full day there, whether you go by car or train. And Riomaggiore is not the best place to stay right now, as the Via dell’Amore coastal path is not yet open. So to leave Riomaggiore and visit other villages, you would have to take a longer, higher path to Manarola, ride a boat, or take the very crowded local train.

I will add that many people (including all of my extended family members, two of whom have lived in Tialy and returned many times since) find the Cinque Terre overrated and overcrowded these days. That was our opinion 12 years ago, and it has only become more crowded since then. Our experience taking the train from Vernazza back to Manarola after our hike was so unpleasant we will not return.

Here is what I would suggest instead., based on your starting point in Luzern. This is the perfect opportunity to take an enjoyable, scenic train over the Alps, instead of the fast train which goes through Europe’s longest and deepest tunnel (57 km long and 2.3 km deep), with no scenery. The Treno Gottardo direct train from Luzern to Locarno uses the older route over the Gotthard Pass, passing through a short tunnel near the top, and a couple of interesting spiral tunnels on the way down. But it stays mostly above ground, with views of peaks and hanging glaciers, as well as villages along the route.

https://www.myswitzerland.com/en-us/experiences/treno-gottardo/

You can spend the night in Locarno at one of several lakeside hotels within blocks of the train station, with the afternoon to explore the town and the lake. Then continue to Florence the following day. This is a journey of 4h 40 minutes with a single change ( Milano), or 4h 9 minutes with 2 changes. Add the night you save by not going to Riomaggiore to your time in Florence.

Posted by
494 posts

To paraphrase Yogi Berra

"5-Terre? Nobody goes there anymore, it's too crowded"

Posted by
4 posts

Thank you all! This was the reassurance I needed to make the change. Sad to hear that CT isn’t what it used to be, but glad to not add further to the tourist crowd. We will likely add a day to Florence and a day to LC and see more in the surrounding areas. Our flight isn’t until 3:10 PM from Milan so not too worried about getting from Varenna to the airport.

Posted by
1321 posts

Agree - skip CT and add to Lake Como.... you won't regret it.

Posted by
3961 posts

Good advice up thread. We were last in CT in 2006. It was great then, but “been there done that!” ;) Lake Como should be lovely. Enjoy.

Posted by
309 posts

I could easily spend a week around Lake Como.

CT was very crowded when I was last there five years ago and much less relaxing than 25 hears ago now. I cannot imagine how it is now with cruise ships docking every day during season.

Posted by
4874 posts

Rick pretty much admits that he has helped CT to be loved to death

Posted by
1617 posts

Based on my travel to Italy, I would add extra time in Florence or add a day in Milan. I would much rather see The Last Supper than a lake or an ocean front.
Although, I don't travel to Europe for the scenery. I enjoy the scenery, but I want to be where history happened. So neither CT norLake Como will see the likes of me again.

Good luck with your decision and enjoy your trip!

Posted by
267 posts

Take the train from Florence to Varenna. No need to rent a car....