Please sign in to post.

Italy in November - Florence & Venice or Florence & Rome

HI,

Visiting my daughter who will be studying in Florence, arriving 11/10-11/17. We have 7 nights. Have not booked air yet. Thinking of 2 itineraries:
Fly to Venice for 2 nights, then 5 nights Florence, fly back from Florence.
Fly to Florence for 5 nights, then 2 nights Rome, fly home from Rome

We are locked into Florence for 5 nights (could possibly go to 4 nights) as my daughter is in school Mon-Thurs and we really want to spend time with her. Guessing she will want to show us Florence, meet her friends, etc. She will accompany us to either Venice or Rome.

Also going is my 16 year old daughter and husband who would both enjoy some non-city, non-museum time. Definitely planning a day trip to Sienna and another possible one - Cinque Terre? Any other ideas?

Are either Cinque Terre or Venice not advisable in November due to weather? Would love to do all - Rome, Venice and Florence but think it is just too much moving around for 7 days.

Would love your thoughts. Thanks in advance!

7 days is not much. I would limit myself to Florence and Rome. Forget about adding any place else. You barely have enough time for Florence and not enough for Rome.

Posted by
12043 posts

Given the time of year and your limited days, CT is a 'no', in my book.

2 days Rome or 2 days Venice. Take your pick. No 'wrong' choice.

If you really need one other place to go while based in Florence, perhaps a day trip to Pisa or Lucca? Or Pisa and Lucca if that ambitious.

Posted by
316 posts

If you fly into Venice and spend 2 nights, you will have 1.5 days of which your half day is jet lagged. If you fly into Florence, and then go to Rome, flying out of Rome, you have 1.5 days as you need to allow a half day for checking out of your hotel, taking the train and checking back into your new hotel. What can you see in one day in Venice? What can you see in 1.5 days in Rome? That is your decision. I would allow one more night to either Venice or Rome and I would go to Venice. Why? To me it's magical. I love it there. Save Rome when you have more time to see it. But, that is just my opinion.

Posted by
789 posts

We did a similar trip to Italy in November 2016, but stayed the entire time in Florence with day trips to Lucca, Siena and Fiesole. There is so much to see in Florence and it makes a great home base for day trips. Also, remember that it gets dark early in Nov. and you may have a little drizzle (we did) that cuts into your sightseeing time.

That said, we ended up returning to Italy the next summer and wished that we had visited Venice in November instead of late June!

Posted by
3303 posts

As mentioned, you lose time on travel days. I would add a day to Venice. Because there is just so much to see and do in Rome, I feel that any visit shorter than 5 days really doesn’t capture the magic of the Eternal City. I’d save Rome for another trip.

Posted by
6 posts

Thank you so much for your replies. I think we will save Rome for another time and fly into Florence and out of Venice. We can get over our jet lag in Florence where we will have the longer stay. Plus it seems we would hardly touch the surface of Rome in that short time. I can see doing southern Italy on another trip and can do Rome at that time.

Think it is coming together!

Posted by
6 posts

Oh good idea. Flights coming in from Boston were good, so I assumed the same for departures. I will have a look.

Posted by
12043 posts

It has been a while since I looked, but it seemed the early flights were the lowest cost and the ones later in the day had a higher price tag. Just have to balance cheap flight and expensive water taxi vs higher priced flight and lower cost transport options, and not having to get up at o'grim 30.