Please sign in to post.

Italy - 3 days

Hi All,
I've been planning a trip with my parents (both above 60) to Europe. I posted in the General Europe thread and got many great suggestions on this thread (https://community.ricksteves.com/travel-forum/general-europe/traveling-through-europe). Now, I am planning the things I want to see per city-in each country. So here's what I'd like to do in Italy:

My list really is quite short as Dad is really interested in seeing only the world famous landmarks of Italy. So please let me know if this works.

Day 1 - Rome (Colloseum, Vatican, St. Peter's Basilica and anything else I can fit in that's famous). As long as I cover those 3 though, I'm flexible.

Day 2 - Pisa. Leaning tower of Pisa. The end :). Hopefully there is something else to see in Pisa or an area close by. Do recommend some nice places if there are any.

Day 3 - Mount Vesuvius. Naples. I thought this would be something unique to see, none of us having ever seen one.

Day 4 - Leave in the morning.

Is this doable? Do suggest ways in which I can do all these 3..one per day. At most, much against my will, I'd have to drop Naples..but would want to look at both Rome and Pisa, that's what Dad wants :)

And if yes..I plan to stay in Rome as my flight out of Europe (Day 4) is from Rome. Is that fine.. or are there towns very close to Rome which are cheaper and maybe have some unique characteristic that we could see in the evenings?

Thanks
Arvind

Posted by
654 posts

I am by no means an expert so keep that in mind. While I understand what you are attempting in Rome, I would not recommend it. It takes TIME to walk thru the vatican, the Sistine chapel, the forum, the coliseum.... We had tickets for the Vatican which also can be limiting. Pisa is great! Just came back from another trip and this time we did Pisa and Lucca on the same day. Had a wonderful time. Easy travel betweent the two cities. Again I had tickets purchased in advance for Pisa (the first climb of the day). We spent a few hours in Pisa (town and the main sites) then travelled to Lucca and spent another 1/2 day there. Several years ago from Naples we went to Pompeii from Naples. I would stay in Rome for the Rome portion... lots to see there.... but then I stay in Rome for at least a day or two each time I visit Italy. But maybe if "see" means to just walk outside it... Just my thoughts. Have a great trip!

Posted by
7343 posts

Arvind- I believe you are arriving in Italy from other places farther north. Are you planning on sleeping in a different place each of the 3 nights, or just passing thru Pisa on your way to Rome? You may want to visit Pisa first. The famous Tower is located together with the Duomo and the Baptistry, so you could catch 3 sights in one place. The Cinque Terre, 5 special towns along the coast not very far north of Pisa are worth visiting on another trip, but you won't have time this trip. Hit Pisa (maybe Lucca, too) then get to Rome before the end of the day.

Rick Steves has a Rome guidebook that also includes Naples, but not Pisa. Or you can get his full Italy guidebook, which is more than you need for this fast trip. The Rome book also includes information on sights within several museums and walks in neighborhoods within the city, so you can do your own museum and city tours. Note that not every sight is necessarily open every day of the week. Depending on what you see, purchasing a Roma Pass for each of you could save time and/or money.

We visited Rome for a whole week in 2012 and only saw part of it. Perhaps hiring a local tour guide to show you the highlights might make good use of your time. At The Vatican, you can see St. Peter's square outside, and do a quick visit inside St. Peter's Basilica, a really big church that will take some time to go thru. Michealangelo's Pieta is just inside the doors on the right, but you may want to venture further inside to view more. Climbing the dome (with an elevator part of the way) will take more time and energy, plus a fee, if you decided to do that. The Vatican Museum, including the famous Sistine Chapel with Michaelangelo's ceiling frescoes, is huge and will take some time to walk thru, even if you don't stop to look at much of the art, so you might decide to skip the museum, although it is outstanding.

The Borghese Gallery requires a reservation, only allows you 2 hours to visit inside, but it's an amazing building full of fabulous art.

For the Colosseum, purchase the tour that gets you into the lower level. See the Pantheon. We also liked the National Museum of Rome, the Capitoline Museums, the Palatine Hill, and the Roman Forum, but each can take some time to view. These probably aren't on everyone's Top 10 list of sights in Rome but we also really liked the Villa Farnesina and the San Clemente church with its 12th Century street level, 4th Century lower level, and 2nd Century subterranean level.

If you stay in Rome each night, you can even visit Naples (the original home of pizza) on a long day trip. Rick suggests a blitz visit that involves leaving Rome by train early in the morning, visiting Pompeii, which was buried when Vesuvius erupted almost 2000 years ago, seeing the Archaeological Museum in Naples (which has most of the art recovered from Pompeii), seeing some of the city of Naples, then retuning to Rome late at night. You can see Mount Vesuvius looming over Naples from a distance, but going on a tour to drive or hike up the mountain will take time and energy. Another very interesting ancient Roman city buried by the Vesuvius eruption is Herculaneum, which is smaller than Pompeii and closer to Naples, so Herculaneum might let you see an archaeological sight but take less travel time, and with less walking, than Pompeii.

We stayed at the Rome Airport Hilton our last night, which made it really easy to catch our early morning flight home. Their incredible breakfast buffet had foods from all over the world, something for everyone, and the room price was surprisingly good in December 2012.

Posted by
4152 posts

Well, the list is short and sweet.

I would suggest, if arriving by train from the north that you stop in Pisa in the morning. This way you can easily visit the tower. If they want to climb the tower they can make a timed reservation for that.

Once done with the tower get back on the train and head to Rome. Once in Rome they should have enough time to visit the colosseum and forum before night fall. The next day they can spend at the Vatican museums and St. Peter's basilica. You say "anything else that's famous" they are interested in seeing. Well........Rome itself is famous and just wandering the streets is well worth it.

Anyway, the next morning they can hop a train down to Naples to visit Vesuvius and then come back to Rome for the night.

Personally, your trip sounds like torture to me. Three cities in three days is not my idea of a vacation but if this is what you like then you should do it. You really aren't giving any of these cities the time they deserve and it sounds more like you're checking things off a list rather than taking a vacation. I know you and your Dad want to see "famous things" but you should take into consideration the amount of travel time involved and the fact that you haven't planned any time to relax and enjoy what you're seeing.

I really do hope you have a great trip and it turns out to be everything you hoped it will be.

Donna

Posted by
381 posts

Very unusual list for a three day trip. Also lots of travel for just three days. I hope you dad is in good shape. If you only have three days in Italy I might rethink you list. Maybe a day in Florence rather than Pisa, and he might enjoy Pomeii more than Mount Vesuvius. I would drop going south all together and maybe just do Rome and Florence and if you dad really wants Pisa than add it as the third day. And yes, if you are coming from the north go to Pisa, Florence than Rome. If you have an early flight you may want to sleep near the Rome airport it is not 10 minutes away from Rome and security takes some time.

Posted by
1589 posts

" Personally, your trip sounds like torture to me. Three cities in three days is not my idea of a vacation but if this is what you like then you should do it. You really aren't giving any of these cities the time they deserve and it sounds more like you're checking things off a list rather than taking a vacation. "

Big AMEN to Donna. Please give this mad rush /sprint trip some more thought.

Posted by
792 posts

I want to confirm you are staying in Rome and doing day trips. That is doable and preferable to spending a different night in each city. I would REALLY rethink visiting Pisa (just to see the tower) unless it has been a lifelong dream to see it. If it is just another "famous thing" to see, then I would spend the extra time in Rome. I took my Grandmother to Pisa and we saw the tower, went "hm", and turned around and left. It was very underwhelming. I know Pisa has more to offer but if you are just checking off the major sites, I think there is more to see in Rome.

Rome has a hop on/hop off tour that will hit a lot of the major sites that might be a nice transportation option. I would also buy tickets ahead of time to minimize your waiting in line time. To Naples, you can take the fast train from Rome which is a little over an hour. From Rome to Pisa, there are many options, some with less stops (2 1/2 hour trip) and some with more (4+ hours). Pay attention to the route to minimize your travel time.

Posted by
663 posts

If you are doing a super quick multi-country trip, you might consider joining a guided tour. The tours coordinate all the logistics for you (transportation, hotels, sight seeing) and are good at getting you to all the important famous sights with little waste of time. I believe Rick Steve's has both a 14 day and 21 day tour that hits most of the major cities in Europe. Or there are other companies as well. My in laws from India did a tour of Europe like that and the tour even brought along a cook to provide Indian food.

Posted by
137 posts

Thank You all for your good advice.

So a bit of context as to why I'm rushing through it. It does seem like a list - yes - that I tick off, but you guys have to get the context behind it. Dad has been hearing about these places all his life, so if he comes here and has a wonderful experience - but doesn't see those "tick tick touristy places", he'll feel we have missed out nevertheless. So, within limits, I'm trying to fit in as much as I can. In other words, while it might seem weird or stupid to not enjoy the city completely ... it's probably okay... as that's the only way the trip will feel "complete". I hope you all understand where I am coming from. I don't know if we will ever come back again - maybe we will - but life's tricky - and I don't know..really.

@Linda: Glad to see you enjoyed Pisa :). I'l keep your advice in mind and see if I can do Lucca too - basically mimic your little tour.

@Cyn: Hello again :). I'm planning to stay in Rome (thinking of a flight from Geneva to Rome - super cheap) and use it as a "home" for my Italy stay. Flights to Pisa seemed terribly expensive, I get what you mean though - it's enroute to Rome from Switzerland - but no that wouldn't work. If I do a day trip to Pisa though, I can certainly consider seeing the places you recommend.

Once I book all my travel and stay I plan to go to the library and get all the relevant guide books per country and drill down further. I'll take a look at Rick Steves's book then.

Good thoughts about the Vatican, St. Peter's and the Colosseum. If I can cover these 3 well, I'll be happy. The rest, I'll write down and do if I have the time.

About Naples, Pompei and Herculanem... I'm fine with any one really. The point is I wanted to see myself and take Mom and Dad as close to a volcano (as long as its safe) as possible. The one closest to Rome... and secondarily has other nice places to see...I'm happy to do. Which do you suggest? Thank You for your detailed reply again :)

@Donna: Indeed...and it does seem like it to me as well, but as mentioned right at the start - it's what I know Dad wants and he'll be ok with the long travel bits. As mentioned in my reply to Cyn, I'd love to see Mt. Vesuvius or any volcano.. which would be the most easily doable as per you?

@Tom: Indeed but that's what Dad will probably prefer the most. I'll keep Pisa as the 3rd day though - that should be doable. Flights from Geneva to Rome seemed cheap and made sense as a base - that's why I picked Rome. I think I'll skip Florence this time. Sorry :(. Great point about the airport in Rome - I'll try and book a place close to the airport albeit at a slightly extra cost - our return flights to Boston and Mumbai respectively are midday.

@Bob: True and I will think, but there's a good chance I'll go ahead as planned for reasons outlined above. Thanks for your concern though.

@Kristen: I'll talk to Dad, that's all I can promise. What you say makes so much more sense but if Dad wants it...hey.. lets make it possible if I can :). Thanks.

@Angela: I do love the planning bit and am past that phase too. I'll go it alone this time and have already booked flight tickets. Yes indeed Arvind is an Indian name :). I've heard of that bit too - a cook in tow wherever you go. Indians love their food most times. I guess most people love food though...that way.

Posted by
1589 posts

You sound like a thoughtful daughter to me- safe trip & great memories with your Pop.

Posted by
137 posts

Thanks Bob and I do appreciate the sentiment. But I'm a 31 year old male :) :) :)

Posted by
128 posts

Hi Arvind,

About your whirlwind (!) visit: RS has 'one day tour of Rome' suggestions in his Rome guide book. I have the digital copy of this guide book and it is on p. 71 of the 2014 edition.

There are some awesome Indian restaurants in the Monti district of Rome (near the Colosseo). Two are on via dei Serpenti and one close by on via Cavour. One of those on via dei Serpenti was always packed with visitors from India, so I thought it must be a good place to dine. I ate there a few times, but I have no experience with Indian food so I can only tell you that I liked what I had.

Use the time the way you need to in order to accomplish your family's goals. I am sure it will be a wonderful trip.

As for me, any time in Rome is never enough!

Posted by
7343 posts

Arvind-standing in the ruins at Pompeii, there's an awesome view of Mt. Vesuvius looking right down the "main" street. Rick's guidebook describes where to stand for the best view & for taking pictures. Pompeii is probably more famous than Herculaneum, but Herculaneum is smaller and many of the buildings are in surprisingly good shape. Before it was buried by Vesuvius, it looked a lot like the modern city around it (minus the cars and people with mobile phones) :-) To pick between the two, for your trip this time, I'd suggest Herculaneum, with a visit to the Archaeological Museum in Naples afterwards, to see artifacts recovered from Pompeii.

Vesuvius erupted 70 years ago, and right now, it just looks like another (calm) mountain, but you never know when it could start to smoke or erupt again. You can take a tour to actually go up on the mountain (described in Rick's guidebook), but, again, it will require some time. If you decide to hike up to the edge of the crater, you'll need time and energy for doing that, too.

We had a little more time to visit the area 2 years ago than you will have, and had a rental car. A great view of the mountain was from across the bay, after we'd driven south towards Sorrento. From downtown Naples, I don't remember trying to view Vesuvius, and there are probably buildings in the way. I believe I remember seeing Vesuvius from Herculaneum, with the top was hidden by clouds. Herculaneum is closer to both Naples and Vesuvis than is Pompeii, although if you go to Herculaneum by train you may have a bit of a walk (again, we had a car and parked in the car park), but a taxi might be a possiblity for you. You can see the volcano better from farther away (or by standing on it). If you ever return to Italy and can travel to Sicily, Mt. Etna is impressive anywhere you see it, with snow at the top. It is also more active than Vesuvius. We're going to Iceland next year, and they have plenty of volcanoes. Have a good trip!

Posted by
1994 posts

Regarding Vesuvius, I'm younger than your parents, and I found it to be a challenging hike. A long up- and downhill walk on much loose gravel. For me, the shifting/sliding gravel was more nerve-wracking than the ascent or descent. The climb was ok. But if your parents aren't particularly agile or good hikers, you may want to forego the climb. There are great views of Vesuvius from Pompeii. Or for nice views over Naples, you could drive to the parking area partly up Vesuvius (ie, the area from which folks start the ascent).

Posted by
137 posts

@dmae: Thank You. I will look at the Rick Steves book for Italy. Thanks for the tip on the Indian restaurants, I'll keep those in mind. I'll post back though in a "where to eat in each country" thread later on :)

@Cyn: Great. Just what I as looking for. I'll look up Herculaenum then instead. No, I'm fairly sure they will not be able to walk up a mountain or anything of that sort. Has to be quite easy to do :). Something on a flat road is fine, I was hoping to see smoke coming out of a mountain (while its not erupting :)). Thanks again.

@Sherry: Thanks for the tip. Yes, they cant climb that far.. no way. No car though. I don't particularly enjoy driving at all :) - stresses me out quite a bit. Anything that I could do with public transport would be nice.

Posted by
1994 posts

There are variety of day trips from Rome that will take you to the Vesuvius parking area, as well as Pompeii or maybe Herculaneum. There probably also are tours from Naples that will take you to the Vesuvius parking area.

Posted by
7284 posts

Having just returned from Sorrento, Pompeii, Herculaneum, Naples, and 3 days in Rome (our third time in Rome), I want to take the side of those who say you are over-reaching. Although I saw young people out and touring at 8AM every morning, Italy is (perhaps like India???) not a very efficient country. Everything takes longer than you might hope. (Not a whine, just a personal impression.) Even with a day-transit-ticket, city traffic makes any bus ride a long one. And the Metro doesn't cover the entire city like it does in London or New York.

Having seen a much more active volcano in Hawaii, I have the luxury of guessing that Vesuvius (which we didn't do ... ) is just a hot, sun-baked, dry and unpleasant climb, after a long bus or shuttle-van ride. It is a waste of time on a three-days (!) in Italy trip. [Opinion, but a strong one]

Pompeii is also lots of walking, and sun-baked, but it delivers much more value for time than a smoking mountain landscape. Pompeii is famous for being hot and stony, and for being time-consuming. (The Circumvesuviana train ride is half-an-hour anyway.) We overheard many couples outside Pompeii and Hurculaneum murmuring "I guess we're not getting to Vesuvius." Do yourself a favor and murmur that now!

I understand that your father wants to see the leaning tower. Is there any point in suggesting a more important and meaningful architectural monument to him? Also, Naples is so crowded (and dirty) that foot touring is slow, and the city is not nearly as rewarding as Rome. But you have to go through it to get to Pompeii. If you can get there, Venice for a day would be much more rewarding than Naples or Pisa. Please use the Search box hear to read old threads here about Pompeii as a daytrip from Rome.

Posted by
137 posts

Thanks Sherry - good to know. I will do some more focused research on Pompeii and Herculaenum.

@Tim: Sadly, India isn't very efficient - I do agree :) - but there's ways of getting to where you need to - if you know the tricks. If you drop down there, and I'm around - give me a shout and we can go around a bit.

Good points about the arduousness of the trek to a volcanic city. I'll consider it carefully - just that we've never seen one and it seems to be a bit different from the usual sights of a city. I can certainly talk to Dad about it - I even did yesterday, and he seemed okay with it... and we kinda decided we'd spend 2 days in Rome and leave the 3rd day completely open to .. Pisa, Volcano :) or anything.. based on our physical and mental state then. So I'll get the info for 2-3 places and take a call later, I guess.

Thank You for your informed opinion.

Posted by
4152 posts

I know you say your dad wants to see all these places but have you talked to him about all the travel involved? You'll spend hours getting to a site only to spend a couple of hours there. Have you explained to him the amount of time you'll spend changing hotels and riding trains? I understand that this is his dream but does his dream really involve riding 6 hours round trip on a train to visit a site for an hour or two? If not, then you need to cut back. All that travel takes it's toll especially on the elderly. Please have a serious talk with him to see if this whirlwind trip is going to be okay with him because if it's just what you "think" he wants to do you may end up being disappointed.

Donna

Posted by
663 posts

Having been to both Italy and India (twice), I would say Italy is far less chaotic. And at least Italy has signs and stuff so you can find your way around. Trying to cross a road in India is taking your life into your own hands and I've actually SEEN people run over, thank goodness the roads are so badly maintained that people cannot drive fast. Oh, and there are few traffic lights so people blast their horns as they go thru intersections. And if there are traffic accidents people run away, because if you stay everyone will come and beat you up. Plus foreigners are way overcharged for everything. My husband will have me stand behind a corner while he negotiates with a taxi driver to prevent being charged 3X more, and even historical sights have will have different prices listed... Like 15 rupees for Indians and 250 rupees for foreigners. India does have some fine points as well... But... I'd certainly rather spend my vacation money elsewhere when given a choice.

Posted by
137 posts

@Donna: What you say makes complete sense...and the fact that so many people are urging me to reconsider, means there must be something to it for sure :). I'll talk to him a bit more and we'll arrive at a compromise - he'll understand.

@Angela: Ouch. Ouch. Its unfortunate you've had such horrible experiences there. Much as I want to, I won't say .. that you're far off the mark though :). It's still a developing country though, and maybe it'll be better in a generation or two. I do know though for a fact, that there are plenty of very nice, helpful people there too - who will go out of their way to make you feel at home. I hope you enjoy your next trip there, if you make one. And if you have trouble somewhere - ping me on this forum - I'll try and suggest anything if I can.

Posted by
7343 posts

Hi Arvind- IF you're reconsidering any of your plans for your 3 days in Italy (maybe your Dad can get a great postcard of the Leaning Tower of Pisa, or a small model from a shop in Rome, without actually going to Pisa?), there are a couple of other sights closer to Rome than either Naples or Pisa.

Ostia Antica is a short train ride west of Rome, and it was the old port on the ocean for Ancient Rome. It's not quite as impressive as either Herculaneum or Pompeii, but still has lots of excavated buildings, original Roman grain mills, a Roman theater, and outstanding mosaic tiled floors made by artisans over 2,000 years ago. We visited Ostia Antica for a couple of hours on our last full day in Italy, then took a taxi from there to our hotel (the Hilton) at the Rome airport for our easy departure the next morning. The guard at Ostia was nice enough to phone a taxi for us.

Also, there are several catacombs (passageways and old tombs) dug deep below the ground just outside of the old Roman walls. The rock around Rome is tufo, which is hardened volcanic ash, so you could actually go down through the remains of ancient volcanic eruptions. Rick's guidebook has details about visiting these catacombs by bus or taxi. We didn't see them on our last visit, but I understand they're a popular sight.

So, are there good Italian restaurants in India? ;-)

Posted by
137 posts

That sounds quite interesting Cyn. Yeah, if I end up not rolling around in molten lava :) .. I'll have this as an option too. It's interesting the response my thread in Italy has got compared to the other countries - so many more people :). Maybe its a really really popular place?

The miniature model sounds good, if we don't do Pisa at all - thanks again.

Oh there are a couple of Italian restaurants in India.. both in South India in Bangalore (although I think Mumbai, where my home is .. in West India has branches too). They were called Little Italy and Eurasia. Very expensive food by Indian standards, but quite quite tasty for sure :).

I'm nearly done deciding my mode of travel between countries by the way and will post back in my main General Europe thread for you guys to tear up tonight, after I'm done with work in a few hours. :)

Posted by
7284 posts

Arvind, sorry to extend this, but it sounds like you may not understand that "Vesuvius" and "Pompeii" are two entirely different, but related attractions. Many people who visit the ruined Roman city of Pompeii also take a 1-hour each way van or bus to the actual volcano and clamber around the cinders and look down into the cone if it's safe that day. The only thing "volcanic" about Pompeii is what happened to it. You originally wrote that your father wanted to see Vesuvius. I replied that Vesuvius is just a smoking hulk. :) Pompeii is a justifiably world-famous attraction whose rediscovery influenced neoclassical design and culture for years afterwards.

The van drops them back where they got on, and they have a 30-40 minute Circumvesuviana train ride to Naples, and in your case, transfer to (if you're lucky) a premium-priced 1hr 10 minute premium train to Rome. The regular train to Rome is over twice as long.

Posted by
137 posts

Thanks Tim. I'm fairly poor at my history ... well poor would be being kind ;). I'll read up on all this before I decide what to do.

Posted by
7343 posts

Hey Arvind- not to keep bringing up Rick Steves, but this is his Website, and his guidebooks are the best there is (for the places he includes). Rick's Italy guidebook and his smaller (so better-for-you this trip) Rome guidebook both have interesting descriptions about the history of the Vesuvius eruption in the year 79 A.D., as well as some history on the part of the world that's now called Italy.

Also, about this section being so busy and popular, Rick Steves once said in a live presentation I attended a few years ago that Italy was, in fact, his favorite country in Europe to visit.

His favorite place in the entire world? India! He didn't say what regions he's visited, and he's not planning on writing a guidebook for India, but there you have it.

Posted by
137 posts

Thanks Cyn. Yeah, I got 'Europe through the Backdoor 2013' from a library and read it end to end once. It was quite nice - I'm reading it again now - picking sections that I want. I also saw the Italy book there - I'll grab it once I'm done with this.

HaHa nice that he likes India though. It's a huge huge country really and I've been to only maybe 25% of all of it - but of course if anyone here plans to visit, do let me know for the inside scoop on how to survive ;)

Posted by
663 posts

I'd probably like India much better if I stayed in a nice hotel, instead of with in-laws who barely speak to me during the 3-4 weeks I stay there because I don't speak Telugu or Tamil. I also don't care for all the Mosquitos and cockroaches. But the food is marvelous, and buying silks and gold. Someday it might be nice to go and not visit family at all. I've been twice, and never seen the Taj Mahal! I've never been anywhere but Chennai and Coimbatore.

Posted by
137 posts

Yes Angela - that's most unfortunate. Chennai and Coimbatore are the southern tip of India...and are very very hot for one year around..so that can't be fun - specially coming from USA. The insects etc are going to be there too - it's all a culture shock if you go from the USA, I can completely understand. The in-laws not speaking thing ... is also unfortunate, although not particularly uncommon for many reasons - that I'm happy to talk about outside this thread some time if you'd like.

Again, its very unfortunate that your experiences have been negative - maybe next time say that you would like to visit India and roam around :) instead of visit family - and just drop in as a courtesy right at the end. All the best.

Posted by
137 posts

So I booked my flight from Geneva to Rome. I'll land in Rome at 8:20pm on the 6th of Sep and will be there for 4 nights. I figured that I should get a hotel somewhere close to the airport or some train station for which there are plenty of trains from the airport. No apartments - I don't want to go hunting for a key at night :). I'd like to pay around a 100$ for a room per night, if that's doable. No frills hotel, B&B are all fine. All I need is a room to sleep in and a private bathroom.

So looking around a bit, I found that there are quite a few hotels which house 3 people at around 100$ per night, which is cool. I found a decent looking budget place called the Locando Otello. Its address is Via Frascati 49 Monte Porzio Catone RM 00040 Italy and seems to be very close to the Termini railway station which is one of the central stops in Rome?

Has anyone stayed here? Is it good enough to sleep in for 4 nights? "Good enough" = Clean + Bed + Private bathroom :)

Thanks

Posted by
4152 posts

Are you sure that's the address? I googled it and it's way outside the city. There is a hotel by the same name right beside the termini station. That one looks fine and is is an okay location.

You might want to try using venere.com. You can sort by price range and location. You may be able to find something else closer into the city for the same amount.

Donna

Posted by
16 posts

I really can't add to your questions, because I will be going to Rome for my first time in a few weeks. I have a few questions to add to yours for the travel forum.
1. Do I need to get advance tickets to tour the Vatican? I will be there the 4th Sunday in the month...I heard it is open that Sunday.
2. I have not made hotel reservations yet....what area do you recommend? We will be flying out of FCO...should we stay around the airport or Vatican City/ City Center.
3. The first part of our trip is so structured that I am letting Rome be more flexible and haven't reserved anything. What is a must to have reservations for prior to arriving in Rome?
THanks, sorry to piggy back off you, Arvind, but thought you may benefit from these questions too.

Posted by
137 posts

Ugh. This is the address - Via Marghera, 13, Rome, 00185 Italy. Is that what you saw? Thanks for the heads up Donna. All this planning has obviously made me a bit nuts as well :)

Yeah the thing is.. there are so so many options and I haven't yet applied for my visa and want to this week for sure. So I need to get this stuff out of the way as soon as I can. So, if its decent enough...I think I'll go for it.

Posted by
4152 posts

sqbouttime, they don't do tours on free Sunday. They also don't book free tickets so you'll need to stand in the line with everyone else. This could mean a 2 hour wait to get inside. Also, it will be so crowded that you'll be moved along with the flow of bodies and won't be able to stop and admire the things that are of interest to you.

You don't need to stay at the airport. You can use venere.com to find hotels in the city. It's a small city with really good public transport so it really doesn't matter where you stay. Without knowing your budget it's hard to make specific recommendations.

Without knowing which sites you want to see it's impossible to tell you is you should book in advance or not. What do you plan on visiting?

Donna

Posted by
7343 posts

Hi sqbouttime & Arvind- we were in Rome in December 2012, which may be a little less busy time than in summer, but it appears Rome's always busy. We got reservations for the Vatican Museum, and although there was NO ONE standing in line when we arrived fairly early in the morning, a long velvet rope maze had still been set up outside the entrance, anticipating a mob of people. Within an hour, the museum was pretty full of people. Touring St. Peter's basilica in the Vatican requires no reservation, but they have security screenings, and it may take you some time to get thru security before getting into the church.

Reservations are required for the Borghese Gallery, which is a fantastic building itself, plus it contains fantastic art. You're limited to a 2-hour visit, which helps ensure you don't stay too long if you have a limited time in Rome and lots more to see. ;-)

We had an apartment in the Trastevere neighborhood for a week, then left Rome to tour more of Italy, and returned our last night before our flight home. We visited Ostia Antica to the west of Rome prior to checking in that last night. We had such an early flight that staying at the Airport Hilton made sense for us, but if someone doesn't need to get up at 4 AM to catch your flight, then staying in downtown Rome for your whole visit should be no problem.