Please sign in to post.

First trip to Italy - early March. Looking for feedback of locations and itinerary

Hi all!

My husband and I are traveling to Italy in March to celebrate my 30th birthday. It will be early March (3-10). We are going for a week. Currently deciding on where to go...

He has been to all of the major cities before (Rome, Florence, Venice). This will be my first time. I have narrowed it down to three options.

1.) Tuscany

-Fly into Florence and rent a car, drive to some of the smaller Tuscan towns

  • Sienna (3 nights)

  • Montepulciano (2 nights); day trip to Pienza

  • San Gimignano (1 night)

  • Fly out of Florence

2.) Rome, Umbria, Sienna

  • Fly into Rome. Stay in Rome for three nights

  • Take train to Orvieto (stay for 1 night)

  • Train to Sienna (2 nights)

  • Fly out of Florence

3.) Florence and Bologna

  • Fly into Florence (4 nights)

  • Train to Bologna (3 nights)

  • Fly out of Florence

Looking for feedback on what option would be the best and if these itineraries are too packed. We are in our late 20s and enjoy walkable cities, food/drink, some museums and history. Thanks!

Posted by
9322 posts

Whatever option you pick, you need to stay in the city of the departure airport the night before your flight. I couldn’t tell if that was implied in your count of a week’s time.

As much as I absolutely love the smaller cities of Italy, I wouldn’t pick option 1 for the month of March. Those locations are more enjoyable if you can eat outdoors, so save that for a different trip.

I don’t think option 3 has enough variety, so I would pick option 2.

Of the auxiliary cities you’re considering, Siena & Montepulciano are higher on my list than the others.

Posted by
8857 posts

Looks like you have 7 nights?
I would also pick Option 2 but do
Rome 3
Orvieto 1
Florence 3

You can always day trip to Siena from Florence

Posted by
1845 posts

Since you have never been to Italy, I can’t imagine not seeing some of the major sites especially with March weather. I would take your option 2, delete either Orvieto or Sienna and add the time in Florence. Of course, after having been to all the places you listed, it’s just my opinion based on my interests.

Posted by
9322 posts

Your other post about both Italy & Spain just disappeared when I wrote this reply, so I will just place it here:

“I think I just replied to your Italy question on another post. : )

I love Italy & have stayed in 49 cities there. So, I think it’s always a great choice!

But, I am going to Spain again for the third February in a row to the Andalusia region, so that’s also saying something. : ). It’s a fantastic location for that time of year! The three cities you listed are very easy by train. Last year I flew into Malaga and immediately took a train to Cordoba. (It takes three flights for me to reach Malaga.)

If Spain, reserve your timed entry to any of these that appeal to you: the Sevilla Alcazar, the Night Light Show at the Alcazar, the Cathedral, the Cordoba Mezquita, the Malaga Picasso museum. Also, the Hammam Bath/massage combos are an excellent way to relax!”

Posted by
9772 posts

Agree with Christine,
Still, if you want to see smaller cities, I would go with #1. You don't need to overnight in San Gimignano. Do it on a day trip from Sienna.
San Gimignano is always very crowded. Hate to think how expensive a hotel there would cost.

Posted by
144 posts

Take train to Orvieto (stay for 1 night)

I drove from Naples to Siena and did a stopover in Orvieto for lunch and a little exploring, which seemed like enough. Maybe transfer that night in Orvieto to Florence so you don't have an 1.5 hour trip to the airport, which will already be a hectic day. Although if you're taking the train and can't stash your bags, maybe that won't work.

I like option 3 because it minimizes the hotel changes and Florence and Bologna are good hubs. Florence gives you the option of a day trip to Lucca. Bologna gets you into Parma/cheese/balsamic country as well as Lambo and Ferrari museums nearby. The only thing I don't like is having to double back to Florence for your departure which will require a train change. Departure days are always hectic so keeping it simple is always better.

Posted by
6528 posts

Any of these would be fine, but as mentioned, weather could be a factor in small towns. Mostly, you need to take logistics into consideration, like being close to an airport for last night, not driving too much on arrival with jet lag, that kind of thing. What do YOU envision?, because it does not have to be what others envision for a first, or tenth, trip.

Posted by
5 posts

Very difficult choices as all cities on your prospective itineraries are worthwhile. I have traveled and studied in Italy and recently did a three-plus week trip, and that was not enough time. With seven days I would also choose number 2, that way you can explore three regions, Umbria, Lazio, and Tuscany, a bit and avoid long travel days. Alternatively, you could stay in one of those regions the entire time in one location and take day trips. I would return to Montepulciano and Pienza (I only had two hours there). Florence is amazing if you love Renaissance Art but be prepared for very long lines everywhere, even in March (same with Rome). I was in Rome in early November 2025 and there are now metal detectors in place (and a long line) to enter St. Peter's Square, which was a bit shocking. It's never easy planning a trip to Italy because everywhere is so full of art, architecture, amazing food, people, beauty. Also, someone mentioned above that it is advisable to stay in the city in which you are flying out of the night before your departure otherwise it's way too stressful. I once flew from Catania to Rome and Rome to Los Angeles in one day. That was a mistake. Buon Viaggio!

Posted by
15948 posts

The most difficult time I ever had driving in Europe was in Tuscany and Umbria 4 years ago. So I wouldn't choose Option 1. I had a Garmin GPS and a cell phone with Google Maps. Many contradictory directions, a few unpaved roads, and not much scenery in late March, when the trees and vineyards were leafless and dreary. Also sunset's around 6.00-6.15 so if you stay for dinner on a day trip, you'll be driving back in the dark.

I'm not keen on Option 2 because Rome is a big, noisy, bustling city with monumental sights. Not the place to start a trip when you're jetlagged due to the time change and sleep-deprived after a red-eye flight. If you do choose this one, stay in Rome and day-trip to Orvieto. Also there are very few trains from Orvieto to Siena. Much easier from Rome.

Option 3 has lots of possibilities. There are 3 really good day trips from Florence: to Siena by bus, to San Gimignano by bus, or to Pisa and/or Lucca by train. Bologna is a rail hub. There are lots of towns you can day trip to. Parma (cheese), Modena (vinegar), Ferrara, Padua, and more. Take a food tour or a cooking lesson. Florence has wonderful art and architecture. Bologna has the oldest university - well worth a tour. Both are very walkable cities.

Posted by
790 posts

Is there any way to add a few days? You're spending so much money and effort and jet lag to get there, it'd be nice to make it a 10-day trip at least. I understand if that's not possible.

I would probably chose a combo of Florence and Tuscany or Rome and Umbria. ie: Only stay in 2 hotels, don't move a third time.

If you were able to make it 10-day, I'd probably do an open jaw version that added a third stop of your choice along that route.