We are a family of five (3 adults and two teenagers) and will be visiting Italy for just over two weeks (16 nights) in the spring or early summer. We are interested in visiting the major cities, but we would also love to balance it out with pretty hill towns and lovely scenery. Beaches are not necessarily a priority for us, since we live very close to a beach in the Caribbean.
I would appreciate any suggestions with regards to our itinerary. I have two possible itineraries here and am not sure which one to go with. I'd like to know if either plan is too much or too ambitious.
It seems to me, from reading some of the posts here, that arriving in Venice and leaving from Rome is more convenient, due to early morning flights, etc. Then someone else mentioned that Milan has non-stop flights to and from the U.S. That would be ideal, but since we're really focusing on that area, I guess that that option is out. It would have been perfect, since neither my son nor I do well on long flights.
PLAN ONE:
Venice – 4 nights (arriving in Venice)
Florence – 5 nights
Siena – 2 nights (most likely renting a car here)
Rome – 5 nights (heading out from Rome)
PLAN TWO (this is based more on Rick Steves' suggestions):
Venice – 2 nights
Florence – 5 nights
Siena – 2 nights
Sorrento – 2 nights (this may give us more time to visit Pompeii, etc.)
Rome – 5 nights
Plan two probably has too many bases and too much traveling around.
Thank you all so much.