Please sign in to post.

First Time in Italy---Feedback, Please

We are three women, two are 60 and one is 72. We are preparing ourselves for lots of walking. ;) We are interested in art, history, ruins, hiking and just learning more about Italy and its peoples. We anticipate that we will fly Norwegian out of LAX on 9/21/18, arriving in Rome at 13:35. We have several AirbnB's in mind, but our favorite is near the Vatican. So, it looks like this:

Day 1: Rome

Day 2: Rome

Day 3: Rome

Day 4: Rome

Day 5: Train to Firenze where we pick up rental car. We have identified an interesting agriturismo that will act as our base as we go out on day trips to various cities of Tuscany (Il Monello)

Day 6: Tuscany

Day 7: Tuscany

Day 8: Tuscany

Day 9: Drive to Firenze where we leave off the car. We have identified an Air BnB in Otrarno for our stay

Day 10: Firenze

Day 11: Firenze

Day 12: Firenze (One of these days will be devoted to a tour van to Cinque Terre for the day)

Day 13: Train to Venice

Day 14: Venice

Day 15: Flight to Rome. Depart for Oakland at 15:55

We realize that Venice is getting shorted a bit, but we ran out of time. Would appreciate any feedback you seasoned travelers have to offer. We are using Norwegian Air, Economy Plus. We have to return to Oakland because of the availability there, rather than LAX, but that is not a big problem since we can get relatively cheap Southwest flights back to Phx.

Once we get this general itinerary down, we will begin to identify how we will spend our time in each of these destinations, but for now we want to nail down the general framework.

We know that there is so very much more to see in Italy, but we hope to return! Thanks, in advance, for your feedback.

Posted by
5687 posts

I'd consider starting in Florence and ending in Rome, so you don't have to fly back the same day (or take the train instead of flying - would be my choice). So you could do Florence, Tuscany, Venice, Rome, and home. There are even a few direct trains

I love the Cinque Terre and have been there three times. But unless you are planning to hike between towns (and some of those trails are difficult; at the moment, the easy ones are closed), I'd skip it; during the day you're going to encounter mobs of tourists. A day in a van and among mobs of people in September just doesn't sound like a fun day to me. Take that day and add it to Venice.

Posted by
11679 posts

Yes, Venice needs more time. I wouldn’t want to stay in the area near the Vatican myself. Look for a rental or hotel near Piazza Navona, more restaurants, and closer to historic sites.

Posted by
12060 posts

I will agree with Andrew that the day trip by van to CT would be better spent as one more day in Venice.

Can you fly into Venice and out of Rome?

Or if you must fly into/out of Rome, consider going directly to Venice, upon arrival in Rome, and work your way back to Rome.

Flying from Venice to Rome on the day you fly out of Rome, on separate itineraries, is not the best idea, and one that most on the forum would advise against.

Posted by
28453 posts

I agree that flying from Venice to Rome to catch a same-day flight is risky. If you miss that flight, you'll be buying last-minute one-way tickets at the walk-up fare. I think the suggestions to end your trip in Rome are spot on.

Posted by
11839 posts

Near the Vatican is an excellent area to stay as long as it isn’t too far west. Where is the apartment.

Posted by
7175 posts

Day 1: Arrive in Rome at 13:35, then train to Firenze (3)
Day 2: Firenze
Day 3: Firenze
Day 4: Train to Venice (3)
Day 5: Venice
Day 6: Venice
Day 7: Train to Florence, then hire car for Tuscany (4)
Day 8: Tuscany
Day 9: Tuscany
Day 10: Tuscany
Day 11: Train to Rome (4)
Day 12: Rome
Day 13: Rome
Day 14: Rome
Day 15: Depart for Oakland at 15:55

Posted by
32398 posts

az,

As you're planning to drive in Italy, note that each driver listed on the rental form must have the compulsory International Driver's Permit, which is used in conjunction with your home D.L. These are valid for one year, and easily obtained at any CAA/AAA office (two Passport-sized photos required, which may be provided by the issuing office). Failure to produce an IDP if requested can result in fines on the spot! Have a look at https://it.usembassy.gov/u-s-citizen-services/local-resources-of-u-s-citizens/transportation-driving/ for more information on I.D.P's and driving in Italy.

You may also want to have a look at some of the other posts here concerning the dreaded Zona Traffico Limitato (limited traffic) areas that are becoming increasingly prevalent in many Italian towns & cities especially Florence, which is almost saturated with automated ZTL cameras. EACH PASS through one of the automated Cameras will result in a €100+ ticket, which you won't know about until several months after you return home! This website provides more information - http://www.slowtrav.com/italy/driving/traffic_cameras_speeding.htm

There's also the issue of parking tickets, high fuel costs, tolls and automated speed cameras including the devious Traffic Tutor system which measures not only instantaneous speed but also average between two points. Violate either or both parameter and expensive tickets will follow.

A GPS along with a good Map would also be prudent. Be sure to give some thought to the question of CDW and theft insurance. In Italy, buying CDW from the rental firm is usually compulsory, so coverage provided by credit cards may not apply. Check the Car Rental section in Europe Through The Back Door for further information. You could also download the "Car Rental" PDF Guide from http://www.gemut.com/ (they have a toll free number if you have any questions).

There are also some potentially expensive caveats to be aware of when using trains and other public transit in Italy. If you need more information on those, post another note.

Posted by
542 posts

We did 2 nights in Venice and to me that was enough.

Consider getting a rental car outside Florence so you dont have to drive in city. We took bus from Florence to Siena and rented car from there.

Also consider VRBO for places to stay. We used them for our Italy trip. Staying near Vatican puts you well outside the center of Rome.

Our trip was 4 nights Florence, 2 nights Lucca, 2 nights Venice, and 4 nights Rome and it was right amount of time in each area.

Posted by
28453 posts

A fair number of people seem happy with only one or two nights in Venice. It is my suspicion that it's because they only spent one or two nights in Venice. A short stay there usually means the traveler sees only a few of the very busiest sights, like Piazza San Marco, and is caught up in tourist mobs for most if not all of the visit. That's tiring and I wouldn't want to do it for three or four days, either. But spending more time in Venice means you can wander away from the crowds and see the magical non-touristy neighborhoods.

Posted by
2124 posts

A fair number of people seem happy with only one or two nights in
Venice. It is my suspicion that it's because they only spent one or
two nights in Venice. A short stay there usually means the traveler
sees only a few of the very busiest sights, like Piazza San Marco, and
is caught up in tourist mobs for most if not all of the visit. That's
tiring and I wouldn't want to do it for three or four days, either.
But spending more time in Venice means you can wander away from the
crowds and see the magical non-touristy neighborhoods.

You know, acraven, isn't that true for almost anyplace in Italy? Certainly Rome for us, even to a certain extent Florence. And I would have loved to spend more than 4 nights in Taormina (Sicily) or 5 nights in Salerno. I'm big into assimilating and routine in Italian neighborhoods and I really grooved on going to the same place for a caffe in the morning and the barista recognizing me, often from the 2nd day. By the third he'd be chatting me up and by the fourth we're exchanging EMail addresses. Great stuff.

Posted by
28453 posts

I always like to have enough time to wander around a city's historic area, which often takes me to streets where there aren't any other people around, not even locals. But Venice seems to be the extreme case, because the mobs are so concentrated on the path between the Rialto Bridge and St. Mark's, whereas there's a whole city to explore. I'm always sad when people say they didn't much care for Venice, because I can't help but think they probably didn't really see it.

Posted by
10 posts

I would skip Venice on this trip and do it as part of Northern Italy on another trip. We stayed in Venice for five nights and it wasn't enough. I recommend renting an apartment in Rome in Trastevere neighborhood, across the Tiber river and a very short walk to the historic area. It is a wonderful, old neighborhood with great restaurants. In regards to the Vatican, be sure to book a tour or you will stand in line for hours to get a ticket. With a tour, you stroll right in and sit in a lounge area to wait for your tour guide. You can leave the tour at any time, all the guides ask is that you return the radio to them.

Posted by
3483 posts

If this is everybody's first trip to Italy, you might consider booking hotels instead of AirBnB's. I say this because the hotel staff is almost always extremely helpful in a number of ways - directions, restaurant recommendations, making reservations, etc.

Posted by
5280 posts

As much as we love Venice, seriously consider saving it for another trip. It really deserves more time than you have available. The small amount of time you'll actually have to devote to it is too short to justify the hassle of getting there on the train and then flying back to Rome. Just one person's two cents worth.