Please sign in to post.

Bridge to Sicily

I honestly don’t know if this is true or not. Saw it as a headline that Italy will build a bridge to Sicily. Can anyone confirm or deny?

Posted by
630 posts

Best of all—the cost will count towards Italia’s NATO contribution.

Posted by
929 posts

I heard of this "soon to be built" bridge since I was a toddler

I'm not even Italian, and I've been hearing this for soooo many years now. I just forgot about it, because I don't think it's coming.

Posted by
929 posts

Best of all—the cost will count towards Italia’s NATO contribution

And that's fine, because in Germany, road improvements are also included. It would certainly make sense to build new roads and bridges now that even heavy equipment can drive on. And it also makes sense to renovate roads now in that sense, if they need to be renovated. Of course, it remains questionable what function the bridge to Sicily will serve, but fundamentally, these costs are part of strengthening the defenses. It would be stupid to buy tanks and then have no roads for them to drive on.

Posted by
2140 posts

There's no way it will get built within 10 years and at less than twice the projected cost. I'll be surprised if the permits are even out of the court system in 5 years.

Posted by
12056 posts

And reports are they want to name it after Berlusconi… Surely there are better historical candidates.

Posted by
522 posts

Call me a dinosaur but I'll miss the train on the ferry
Brad

Posted by
12752 posts

With three car lanes in each direction flanked by a double-track railway, the bridge would have the capacity to carry 6,000 cars an hour and 200 trains a day — reducing the time to cross the strait by ferry from up to 100 minutes to 10 minutes by car. Trains will save 2/12 hours in transit time, Salvini said.
( From the link jeff posted)

The saving in transit time, especially for rail traffic, makes a compelling case to push forward with the project

Posted by
127 posts

Along the lines of humorous responses, my mom and dad grew up in Italy.
Dad lived until 90 mom is 96, they learned about this bridge in school. LOL

Posted by
10922 posts

The saving in transit time, especially for rail traffic, makes a compelling case to push forward with the project

The tectonic activity in the area, though, makes a strong case against

Anyway, the Sicilians and the Calabrese and the Greeks and Romans and Carthaginians and Arabs and Normans have been getting between the two easily for centuries ...

Posted by
16798 posts

I’m not sure the seismic activity is the principal obstacle. The SF Bay Area is much more seismically active than the Strait of Messina and yet we’ve got some major suspension bridges. Actually an engineer who was part of the team who designed the latest section of the Bay Bridge, opened a few years ago, told me that the biggest challenge for suspension bridges are strong winds rather than quakes.

We’ll see if it will ever be built. So far the biggest obstacle was funding and political will.