What are thoughts about basing our lodging in the area of the Vatican vs the Colosseum?
Thanks for the responses, but we have a new development to consider. Because my husband is currently having issues with plantar fasciitis, we are wondering if it would be better for us to be based nearer a metro station or bus stop rather than a tourist site like the Vatican or Colosseum. Which of the two are more reliable and would get us around to the popular tourist sites more efficiently? He can walk short distances, but he is going to have to be careful that he doesn't overdo it. We had hoped to be based close to a tourist site like the Vatican or Colosseum that would be within short walking/viewing distance, but now we have to think about just getting around Rome without having his plantar fasciitis flare up.
It would be nice to have our base close to transportation that would also get us close to the tourist sites, so he wouldn't have to do too much walking. I know the Colosseum is close to a metro station. I remember being close to the Colosseum when our Rick Steves tour got off the metro, but I don't know about other sites like the Vatican, Trevi Fountain, Spanish Steps, Piazza Navona, Campo di Fiori, etc.
We have to not only consider whether our base is close to a metro station or bus stop, but also whether the tourist sites we want to visit are close to a metro station or bus stop. I would imagine there are more bus stops than metro stations, so they would get us closer to a tourist site, but are they reliable and convenient for seniors?
We would appreciate any thoughts or recommendations. Our trip is in 2 weeks, and we may have to cancel because of his limited mobility.