Hello, All. Still working on this two week Italian adventure for next May. Thanks for your help!
Most guidebooks show a two week trip along the lines of Venice to CT to Florence to Tuscany (hill towns) to Rome, etc. I'm thinking it could be enjoyable to begin the trip with water (Venice) and end the trip with water (Cinque Terre). It seems that could be relaxing on each end. Could this work well or is there a reason the guidebooks all encourage essentially the same route?
Fly into Milan or Venice (depending on airfare and times)
Venice (2-3 nights)
Siena area (3-4 nights)
Assisi area (2 nights)
Rome (3 nights) - My sister and friend may head home from Rome.
CT (3 nights) - My husband and I would go to CT from Rome, stopping to see Pisa along the way.
Fly out of Milan
Questions -
1. Is that a good route or should I stick with the guidebooks?
2. In the end it might be wise to cut either the CT area (CT/Lucca/Pisa) or the Assisi area (Assisi, Gubbio, Spello, Spoleto, Montefalco, Bevagna) to make this trip more relaxing and balanced. Like most, it seems it's difficult not to want to do it all! Any thoughts on this?
3. If we go directly from Venice to Siena we'd like to get our rental car in Florence (if we're sure we can avoid ZTLs!) and drive the SR 222 route through the Chianti wine region before checking into our agriturismo just outside of Siena. That seems like an efficient use of our time without backtracking. Perhaps better still would be to train to Siena, taxi to our agriturismo, and visit the Chianti countryside on another day? Is the Chianti drive a must see or will the area around Siena and the Val d'Orcia have enough beauty and wineries to take care of that 'need'?
Thanks, again, everyone!